Scientists Say About 90% of Sperm Is Now Damaged and Swims Poorly from Chemical Exposure

Written by on March 15, 2017 in Environment, Environmental Hazards with 0 Comments

By Katherine Martinko | Treehugger

Endocrine disrupting chemicals in our environment have damaged male sperm, most of which are now misshapen and unable to swim properly.

The image at the top of Nicholas Kristof’s latest column for the New York Times shows a single sperm trying to swim, but instead it is moving wildly in circles. According to the caption, the sperm is a victim of an endocrine-disrupting chemical in sunscreen that has damaged its swimming ability.

Unfortunately, it’s not alone. Kristof goes on to describe a looming reproductive crisis on a scale that few people understand. Scientists say that sperm counts have plummeted in the past 75 years and that 90 percent of a typical young man’s sperm nowadays is misshapen and unable to swim properly. Donor clinics are having trouble finding viable sperm:

“One recent study found that of sperm donor applicants in Hunan Province, China, 56 percent qualified in 2001 because their sperm met standards of healthiness. By 2015, only 18 percent qualified.”

The culprit is endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which are found in plastics, furniture, flame retardants, cosmetics, receipts, nail polish, hand sanitizer, metal food cans, toys, pesticides, fast food, and countless other items – ordinary items, as you can see, that we handle on a daily basis. The disruptors pretend to be our own hormones, which throws off the delicate balance of growth and reproduction.

Kristof explains that damage to the reproductive system starts in utero, passed from mother to fetus:

“Male and female fetuses start pretty much the same, and then hormones drive differentiation of males from females. The problem seems to be that endocrine disrupting chemicals mimic hormones and confuse this process, interfering with the biological process of becoming male.”

That this is caused by environmental factors is underscored by the fact that immigrant populations retain their country of origin’s risks of reproductive health only for the first generation. By the time the second generation is reproducing, their risks of reproductive health match those of their new country. As scientist Christine Lepisto wrote for TreeHugger in 2014, “Such rapid changes cannot be explained by pre-existing genetic conditions, but look like influences of environmental conditions.”


Tags: , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend