Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama’s TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

Posted by on February 11, 2014 in Government, Politics with 2 Comments

Eric Zuesse | Opednews | Feb 12th 2014

harry-reid-obamaOne of President Barack Obama's top priorities ever since he entered the White House has been to achieve two international trade deals, one with Europe, and the other with Asia, that will enable international corporations to override the laws in participating nations and thus to provide ultimate corporate control over regulations concerning pesticide-use, food-safety, global-warming abatement, collective bargaining, and other such matters.

On Wednesday 29 January 2014, the leader of congressional Democrats, Harry Reid — the U.S. Senate Majority Leader — came out publicly saying, “I'm against fast track.” This means that unlike the international-trade treaties that were rammed through Congress under George W. Bush, Obama's trade deals won't be — and that they are thus now practically dead.


Fast track trade promotion authority (TPA) enables an international-trade deal to be presented to Congress for an up-or-down vote without any amendments and without any possibility of being filibustered. TPA was first introduced in 2002; and, in order for it to be able to be imposed under the law, the Majority Leaders in both the House and the Senate must introduce the implementing bill to their respective bodies. This means that, if Harry Reid in the Senate declines to introduce TPA to the Senate, then Obama's extremely controversial TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement) and TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) are both virtually dead.

Harry Reid, in announcing his decision, said, “I think everyone would be well advised just to not push this right now,” which, translated, means: Unless and until President Obama rewrites major provisions of each of these two deals, both of them are, indeed, dead.

The question, now, therefore, is: How likely will Obama do that? The deals haven't yet even been finalized, and the leaders of some democratic nations are demanding that Obama's provisions for international corporations to be empowered to override democratically passed legislation in their countries be removed before they would sign it. So, Obama's plan for international corporate control of regulations within the participating countries is now being opposed both by his own Party at home, and by the leaders of some democratic countries whose signatures would also be needed if the deals were to become law.

[read full article here]

Tags: , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

2 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. teresajoy@rocketmail.com' bumpercrop says:

    There was enormous, well organized, grass roots efforts to reject fast track, and fast track on the Trans Pacific Partnership by we the people. Harry Reid simply responded to this public outcry. This proves that our grass roots efforts against the cabal does have power. United we stand, Divided we fall. Your efforts do matter and your energy, combined with like-minded community, can defeat evil.
    Thanks to all citizens who called their elected officials, signed petitions, showed up at TPP protests, and participated in helping to organize strategic, political efforts to stop the TPP.

  2. rudistade@live.ca' Rudi Stade says:

    This item looks rather dated, now that the TTP is, almost exactly two years later, virtually a done deal

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend