Consumer Reports Advocates GMO Labeling

Posted by on October 21, 2014 in Hazards, Issues & Diseases, Health with 1 Comment

| Naturalsociety | Oct 21st 2014

gmo labeling may contain gmoPerhaps you’ve looked at Consumer Reports when searching for a car or washing machine to purchase, but now the heavyweight for consumer advocacy is throwing some serious weight around. Concerning what, you ask? Well, GMO labeling campaigns – a huge boon in a time when Monsanto, Dow, Pepsi-Co, Coca-Cola, Kraft, Cargill, Syngenta, etc. are having a heyday with our constitutional rights.

Consumer Reports is known for publishing well-researched and comprehensive reviews on everything from SUVs to toaster ovens, but now they are supporting consumers as never before by telling the truth about genetically modified foods, and also sharing consumer opinions about what they think a food label should contain.

The company has revealed a set of compiled research on over 80 common products, and their results are telling:

  • 2/3 of US residents equate ‘natural’ with ‘non-GMO,’ though this is sadly a false connection. The ‘natural’ label is practically meaningless, especially when you consider that companies like Pepsi and General Mills have been sued for using it while food products contained carcinogens and GMOs alike.
  • Oddly, though many people think ‘natural’ means that a product contains no GMOs (and they have every right to assume that, though it isn’t currently true) out of over 1000 people surveyed, 3/4 said that NOT eating GMO was important to them.
  • Many consumers are confused about current food labels since they are often inconsistent. What’s more, messages about what is really in their food is ‘hidden’ in ingredients with different names and confusing titles.

gmo food chart consumer reports e1413610308234 Consumer Reports Advocates GMO Labeling

“GMO labeling should be required in the U.S., but in the meantime some food manufacturers are choosing not to use genetically modified ingredients and are noting that on their products’ packaging. To see how many foods have GMOs and whether you can trust the claims you see on food packages, we bought more than 80 different processed foods containing corn or soy between April and July 2014.

(Corn and soy are the two most widely grown genetically engineered crops in the U.S.) We tested at least two samples of each product, each sample from a different lot, to measure the GMO content. Then we compared our results with any non-GMO-related claims.”

You can see that full report here.

Consumer Reports has even gone so far as to send a letter to the Federal Trade Commission asking the agency to investigate the non-GMO claims on packages of Xochitl Totopos de Maiz corn chips after finding several instances of genetically engineered corn in the product.

Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union, said in a statement:

“Shoppers are being misled when they buy products labeled ‘natural’ given their expectation that they are getting food that contain no GMOs. Foods that are frozen, made from concentrate or homogenized are all required to be labeled. Why shouldn’t products containing GMOs also be labeled?”

Consumer Reports director of consumer safety and sustainability, Urvashni Rangan, said on CBS:

“If a product didn’t have a claim on it, it was likely to contain GMO corn and soy.”

You can watch Rangan talk about GMOs from the Consumer Reports study, here.

Additional Sources:

Washington Post

More from Naturalsociety

Tags: , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

1 Reader Comment

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Katherine L says:

    To HELL with labeling. There is no bargaining with our sustenance. Give people real food from the Earth. Clean, untampered, good quality foods. This is our right. Clean water, air and food. Label yourselves Agenda 21 if you want to label things. The end.

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend