‘What Do You Call a Country That Institutionalizes Child Abuse?’: Democrats Hold Sit-In Demanding End to Trump Family Separation Policy

Written by on June 14, 2018 in Corruption, Government, Policies, Politics with 2 Comments

“Every hour that goes by is another hour of trauma for these moms, dads, little boys, girls, and babies.”

By Jake Johnson, staff writer | Common Dreams

“What do you call a country that institutionalizes child abuse? Tragically, today, we call it the United States of America,” said Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) from the steps of the CBP building in the nation’s capital. (Photo: Rep. Pramila Jayapal/Twitter)

As the heart-wrenching story of a Honduran mother having her baby daughter ripped from her arms by federal authorities as she was breastfeeding provided yet another example of the immense cruelty of President Donald Trump’s family separation policy, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) on Wednesday led a sit-in outside the offices of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) demanding that asylum-seekers be released from government detention and reunited with their loved ones immediately.

“Every hour that goes by is another hour of trauma for these moms, dads, little boys, girls, and babies,” Jayapal—who was joined in the act of civil disobedience by a group of House Democrats and immigrant rights activists—wrote on Twitter.

“What do you call a country that institutionalizes child abuse?” added Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) from the steps of the CBP building in the nation’s capital. “Tragically, today, we call it the United States of America. As a mother, as a grandmother, as the proud daughter of two immigrant parents, we will not stand for that… We will fight until we win.”

The House Democrats’ sit-in comes just days after Jayapal visited a federal detention facility in Washington, where mostly women asylum-seekers told her one horrifying story after another about awful living conditions at Border Patrol facilities, abuse they’ve experienced at the hands of immigration authorities, and the pain of being separated from their young children.

In a speech on Wednesday, Jayapal—who last week called for Trump’s family separation practices to be completely defunded—vowed to continue fighting for migrants who are being detained unjustly and denied a fair hearing.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Tags: , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

2 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Adman says:

    This policy was started under Obama as a way to justify open boarders
    Trump is trying to deal with and change it but the left and congress wont
    The children who are being seperated from parents because their parents are being held for a court date in a dention center because of previous deportations and or felony
    Would you rather the children be incarcerated with parents?

  2. kerr.ingham@yahoo.com' Robert Charles Kerr says:

    If Democrats are so opposed to this defacto policy of separating children from parents, and the trauma it creates, Then WHY do the Democrats stand behind the laws that lead to defacto separation of fathers from their children in divorce cases?
    Right now, in a divorce (in Michigan, and in may other states), the defecto standard policy of Friends of the Court, is that one parent gets custody, and the other parent only gets to visit the children one evening (4 hours) a week, and every other weekend. In one county here, they have even gone further, and determined that when schools break for the summer, the non-custodial parent loses those visitation periods in exchange for a single full week over the summer break.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend