New Vaccines Will Permanently Alter Human DNA


By Jon Rappoport | No More Fake News

flu vaccines

Editor's Note: Vaccines are already controversial, with far-reaching human rights, privacy, and (of course) health ramifications. Consider the magnitude of DNA-changing vaccines, which may soon be marketed to us for the alleged promise of disease prevention. Of course, this kind of scientific inquiry is along the same lines as the dream of some parents to be able to manipulate genetics in order to have the “perfect child.”  Yet in our striving for perfection, will we allow these scientists to ram through untested or inadequately-tested medicines & technology, as with GMO Salmon or GMO Mosqitoes – and unleash unknown problems for our future. What kind of mutations might these bring, and what kind of mutants might we become? And what might mad scientists, our militaries or our government do with the access we give them to our bodies.

Why is the government so maniacal about injecting vaccines?

Consider this article in light of the accelerating push to mandate and enforce vaccination across the planet.

The reference is the New York Times, 3/9/2015, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.”

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Permanent alteration.

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

Let’s take this further. Under the cover of preventing disease (and all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.

The enormous tonnage of propaganda about vaccines, and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination, create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible.

Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species.

This grand experiment could be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 would be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 would be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.

Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results. On various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies’ responses to the genetic alterations.

Are these people stronger or weaker? Do they exhibit signs of illness? Do they report behavioral changes? Through surveillance and testing, all sorts of information can be compiled.

Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.

And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary. On a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. On the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans. Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the “chosen few.” And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce “better soldiers” is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA.

A global vaccine experiment of the type I’m describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which “have nothing to do with vaccines.” This is already SOP for the medical cartel.

[Read more here]

Robert O'Leary 150x150

Robert O’Leary, JD BARA, has had an abiding interest in alternative health products & modalities since the early 1970’s & he has seen how they have made people go from lacking health to vibrant health. He became an attorney, singer-songwriter, martial artist & father along the way and brings that experience to his practice as a BioAcoustic Soundhealth Practitioner, under the tutelage of the award-winning founder of BioAcoustic Biology, Sharry Edwards, whose Institute of BioAcoustic Biology has now been serving clients for 30 years with a non-invasive & safe integrative modality that supports the body’s ability to self-heal using the power of the human voice. Robert brings this modality to serve clients in Greater Springfield (MA), New England & “virtually” the world, with his website. He can also be reached at romayasoundhealthandbeauty@gmail.


Tags: , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

21 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Fashola Savage says:

    Terrible conseque

  2.' Ange Wells says:

    No shit.

  3.' Teresa Koprowski says:

    Rustah Martinez

  4.' Erik Albert says:

    You try and do everything at the same time, without defining a clear path for humanity, clearly a let’s swing from tree to tree approach that became an obsession.

    You can only truly evolve when you overcome the concept of budgeted science applied as seen fit.

    Basically: ‘The end of science is not to prove a theory, but to improve mankind.’ – MPH

  5.' Bells Kirby says:

    Everything we do changes our DNA… Epigenetics 101

  6.' Jun Whitt says:

    They’re trying to put those awake, back to sleep. It’s our every right to refuse such anarchy.

  7.' Rachel Christine McCabe says:

    A nurse practitioner told me her self that state insurance carriers get a different vac then others. She said, “well, they are the same, but the state insurance ones go to the government first before the come to the doctor’s office”. Why would they keep them separate? Separate but equal? Yeah, rignt!

  8.' Jane Lewis says:


  9.' San Cleland says:

    Rise up and stop them? Sometimes I feel like I’m living in a really badly/not badly-made science fiction movie.

  10.' Gina Haber says:

    What possibly could go wrong?

  11.' Roc Rena says:

    Channel Tabor Andrika Allen Burney

  12.' Alejandro Diaz Guerrero says:


  13.' Kaila Thornton says:

    Elise Jones

  14.' Ivan A Hernandez says:

    David Silvey

  15.' Pam Berryman says:

    I’d like to see them try to inject me and family with that poison, I’ll stick their needle where the sun don’t shine

  16.' Susan Gunn Patrick says:

    Stop the madness!

  17.' Robert Dinero says:


  18.' Linda says:

    My new grandson was given the Hepatitis B vaccine at 12 hours, although his mother checked the box on the consent form which said clearly “I do not consent”. The hospital advised us they made a mistake and apologized. Although someone was supposed to come and discuss it with us, the mom was released without any more mention of it. What to do next?

  19.' Robyn Nelson says:

    Frightening.We need to be vigilant about all this control,& stand up for Human Rights,& all living creatures.Too much meddling with Mother Nature

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend