Here’s Why Portland, Oregon Just Filed a Major Federal Lawsuit Against Monsanto

Posted by on January 10, 2017 in Environment, Environmental Hazards with 0 Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Jake Anderson | The Anti-Media

(ANTIMEDIA) Portland, OR — Becoming the seventh city to sue Monsanto over contaminated waterways, Portland passed a resolution last week authorizing city attorney Tracy Reeve to take the biotech company to federal court over its decades-long dispersal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The city has spent more than $1 billion cleaning up PCB pollution in the Willamette River, and now it wants the agrochemical giant it deems responsible for the contamination to pay for the damages.

For decades, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a highly toxic group of chemicals, were used to insulate electronics, as well as in paint, transformers, caulk, and other items. Between the 1930s and 1970s, Monsanto, which was the sole manufacturer of the chemical compound, produced more than 1 billion pounds of PCBs. Now they are dispersed throughout the environment, littering air supplies, rivers, waterways, and landfills.


In a statement, city attorney Reeve said:

“Portland’s elected officials are committed to holding Monsanto accountable for its apparent decision to favor profits over ecological and human health. Monsanto profited from selling PCBs for decades and needs to take responsibility for cleaning up after the mess it created.”

Monsanto continues to maintain that it stopped producing PCBs when they were discovered the government to be toxic and banned by the EPA in 1979. But documents show the company knew “as far back as 1969 that PCBs led to contamination of fish, oysters and birds” and that “global contamination” posed a risk to human health. Portland’s lawsuit contends that the company actually knew as far back as 1937 that its product was hazardous to human health.

Monsanto disputes having prior knowledge of PCB health risks. In a statement, the St. Louis-based company responded to Portland’s lawsuit with a denial of any wrongdoing.

The company’s vice president of global strategy, Scott Partridge, stated:

PCBs have not been produced in the U.S. for four decades, and the Port is now pursuing an experimental case on grounds never recognized in Oregon history.”

Curtis Robinhold, the Port’s deputy executive director, disagrees:

“Any decision to conceal facts about human health should have consequences. Monsanto reaped huge profits from the manufacture and sale of PCBs, and it is entirely appropriate for those faced with the cost of cleaning up this contamination to hold them accountable.”

Portland continues to spend money on cleaning up PCB contamination in the Willamette River and Columbia Slough. The Portland Harbor Superfund cleanup project has also targeted the chemical. Portland now joins six other West Coast cities — Seattle, Spokane, Berkeley, San Diego, San Jose and Oakland — in suing Monsanto.

However, these lawsuits may ultimately prove ineffective against a federal system that shields giant corporations from accountability. Monsanto is currently seeking permanent immunity from PCB liability. Last month, Congressional Republicans attempted to amend the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reauthorization bill with a clause that would render Monsanto non-liable for any PCB injuries.


This article (Here’s Why Portland, Oregon Just Filed a Major Federal Lawsuit Against Monsanto) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Jake Anderson and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Read more great articles at The Anti-Media.

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend