Jonathan Cole provides a comparison of scientific evidence for 9/11 with the Copernican model of a Sun-centered solar system. Most people believe the official explanation and refuse to alter their viewpoint, even when contradictory evidence is presented.
Ground Zero 911 is a loose coalition of individuals, activists, organizations, and alternative media outlets determined to make 2014 the year that 9/11 truth reasserts itself into the political dialogue.
You are the jury as new and existing evidence is presented with regard to the aviation related events of September 11, 2001. Analysis of evidence by Pilots for 911 Truth includes an in-depth study of the Departure Gate at Dulles, In-Flight navigation, and data provided by government agencies that far exceeds the capabilities of the alleged 911 aircraft. Evidence is presented that makes a strong case for new independent investigation into the events that changed our world.
Today, March 18th, the ReThink911 group launched a new ad campaign that is showcased within the Toronto subway system (TTC.) This campaign will be running for 2 weeks and approximately 1.2 million residents of Toronto will see video footage of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 compared to a controlled demolition with the caption “ReThink911.org.”
During the post-game interview with Superbowl Most Valuable Player Malcolm Smith, Matthew Mills, 30, from Brooklyn, snatched the microphone from him and shouted: “Investigate 9/11. 9/11 was perpetrated by people in our own government.” Mills then dropped the microphone and walked off the stage. New Jersey State Police have charged Mills with criminal trespass.
The official theory of Building 7’s collapse is shown to be implausible by the inability of the official theory’s authors to generate a computer model of the collapse that even remotely resembles the observed collapse.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology issued its final report on Building 7 in November 2008, more than six years after starting its investigation. Because almost all of the physical evidence had been destroyed, NIST’s theory depended largely on its ability to reproduce the collapse through modeling. Despite being able to adjust inputs in order to achieve the desired result, NIST’s model does not come close to reproducing the observed collapse.
Like the Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination, the 9/11 Report assembled by a Congressional investigation is unraveling and being revealed for what it really is – nothing more than a cover story. This is no longer a conspiracy theory… it’s conspiracy fact.
In 1963, under the John F. Kennedy administration, a top secret operation was proposed to promptly deal with the Cuban leader, Fidel Castro. In this proposal, entitled Operation Northwoods, the United States Central Intelligence Agency would pose as members of the Cuban government, hijack planes and fly them into prominent U.S. buildings. Although thrown out shortly before J.F.K.’s unexpected assassination, is it possible that this covert operation, never meant to be viewed by the American citizenry, was utilized thereafter as a pretext to invade the Middle-East and seize their oil supply?
What is the link between the Cold War and 9/11? Did the Bush entourage and the conspirators behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks use the event as a distraction while billions of dollars worth of securities cleared right under noses of the American public? Read on to discover more…
In this video John a former U.S Marine with 5 engineering degrees with an expertise in aviation and missile defense says he knows the U.S government is lying about the 9/11 terrorist events. It was shot on September 11th 2013, in Times Square at an Rethink911.org rally.
Abby Martin remarks on how the American political and media establishment has marginalized those who question the US government’s official narrative on the events of 9/11.
Seven psychologists plus author David Ray Griffin, Ph.D., provide insights on why so many people are in total denial regarding the truth about 9/11 despite “nine years of hard scientific evidence that disproves the government theory about what happened on September 11.” Trauma, fear, pride, and cognitive dissonance (information that contradicts beliefs about our worldview) […]
Abby Martin speaks with Kevin Ryan, co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies and author of ‘Another 19′, a book that explores 19 alternative suspects that he alleges had the real means and motive to pull of the 9/11 attacks.