Thrive II Preview

Pandemic Sparks Call for End to Big Ag’s Control of Seeds and Food System

Posted by on January 14, 2021 in Food, Drink & Nutrition, Health with 0 Comments

By Kenny Stancil | Common Dreams

A growing number of people around the world are calling for the public ownership of seeds, which they say is essential for a more democratic and ecologically sound food system, as the coronavirus-driven spike in empty supermarket shelves and the continued loss of biodiversity this year sparked a rise in the popularity of saving and swapping seeds and shed more light on the negative consequences of allowing a handful of agrochemical corporations to dominate the global seed trade.

“Four companies have gained oligopolistic control over more than two-thirds of commercial seed and pesticide sales while decimating the innovative contribution of public sector researchers and threatening the 12,000-year-old right of peasants to breed, save, and exchange their seeds.”
—Pat Mooney, ETC Group


In the United Kingdom, the seed saving movement had been “quietly growing” for a while, but “from March onwards, when the pandemic hit the U.K., seed producers and seed banks across the country were overwhelmed with demand,” with multiple organizations experiencing a “sharp surge in orders, 600% in some cases,” Alexandra Genova reported Monday in The Guardian.

“People crave connection,” David Price, managing director of the Seed Cooperative, told The Guardian. “They want a connection with other people and connect with the planet, and growing and saving seed is a way of getting both.”

Genova noted that while “many British consumers feel disconnected from the processes of food production… seed saving allows everyone to be involved in the food system.” Moreover, advocates say seed saving can contribute to reversing the dramatic decline in the availability of plant varieties that are “richly diverse, well adapted to the soil and local climate, and more resilient to climate change.”

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has estimated that since the beginning of the 20th century, roughly 75% of the genetic diversity of agricultural crops and 93% of unique seed varieties have disappeared. This biodiversity loss has been attributed to industrialized agriculture and what Genova called “the big boom in agrochemicals.”


As the FAO has explained, the increasingly commercialized nature of plant breeding has permitted transnational seed and agrochemical corporations—which enjoy so-called plant breeders' rights that give “patent-like protection to breeders with limited monopoly rights over the production, marketing, and sale of their varieties”—to privatize access to genetic resources taken from countries in the global south.

Scholar-activist Pat Mooney of the ETC Group coined the term “biopiracy” to describe how genetic material originally nurtured by impoverished farmers is turned into patented seeds that now generate huge profits primarily for BASF, Bayer/Monsanto, ChemChina-Syngenta, and Corteva Agriscience.

In a 2018 report (pdf) on industrial food chain concentration, Mooney explained that these “four companies have gained oligopolistic control over more than two-thirds of commercial seed and pesticide sales while decimating the innovative contribution of public sector researchers and threatening the 12,000-year-old right of peasants to breed, save, and exchange their seeds.”

“I want all local communities or regions to have their own seed bank so everyone knows exactly where to get a free seed.”
—Helene Schulze, Seed Sovereignty Program of the U.K. and Ireland

The blossoming of what researchers Karine Peschard and Shalini Randeria call “seed activism” is “largely in response to the intensification of corporate seed enclosures and to the loss of agrobiodiversity,” Genova reported. “Many seed savers are motivated by this idea of dismantling the increasing privatization of seeds… by drawing attention to the negative impact of such high levels of concentration.” She continued:

Less than 50 years ago, most of the world enjoyed food that came from entirely open-pollinated seed varieties, which could be saved for future crops. Much of the seed sold now by the large companies are, in contrast, GM or F1 hybrid seeds. These cannot be saved for use in following years because they are genetically unstable and are protected by seed and patent laws, meaning most farmers are tied to chains of dependency.

According to Helene Schulze, who works on the Seed Sovereignty Program of the U.K. and Ireland and co-directs the London Freedom Seedbank, “Covid made people really understand how our food system is dominated by a few large corporations, and this has put a focus on seed sovereignty,” which Genova defined as “a grower's right to breed and exchange diverse, open-source seeds, which can be saved and are not patented, genetically modified, or owned by one of the four agrochemical companies that control more than 60% of the global seed trade.”

Campaigners at Open Source Seeds, the Campaign for Seed Sovereignty, and elsewhere are pushing for seeds to be brought back into public ownership, arguing that “something as universal as food crops should belong to everyone, not a small group of agrochemical companies.”

“If you own the seeds you own the food system,” Schulze told The Guardian. “Access to open-pollinated seeds is the cornerstone of food citizenship because it creates non-market access to growing.”

“I want all local communities or regions to have their own seed bank,” she added, “so everyone knows exactly where to get the free seed.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend