Denmark Abandons Forced Vaccination Law After Public Protests

Posted by on December 10, 2020 in Activism, Conscious Living with 0 Comments
image_pdfimage_print

By Franz Walker | Science.News

The Danish government abandoned a proposed “epidemic law” that would have given it broad powers to enact measures against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), including forced vaccinations, after nine days of public protests.

Had it been passed, the law would have allowed the government to conduct forced physical exams and mandate isolation. It was, however, the part about police-directed forced vaccinations that caused the biggest uproar resulting in the protests that eventually saw the law being dropped.

New “epidemic law” was set to replace expired emergency law

Denmark’s “epidemic law” was set to replace an emergency law that was passed in the spring and expired on Nov. 13. That law gave the government extended powers to intervene in society to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition to enforcing quarantine measures, the temporary law gives authorities the power to prohibit access to supermarkets, shops, public institutions, and even public and private nursing homes and hospitals. It also gave them the authority to impose restrictions on access to public transport.

The government has made full use of the existing law. In October, it used it to enhance national restrictions, placing limits on public assembly and mandating the use of face masks. More recently, it used it to enforce a partial lockdown of North Jutland after a mutated version of the coronavirus was found in mink farms in the region.

That emergency law, however, is now up for replacement with a new more permanent law. The new “epidemic law” would have been its replacement; however, it came with several provisions – in addition to the forced vaccinations – that raised eyebrows.

It would have allowed the government to force people infected with dangerous diseases to be forcibly given medical examinations, hospitalized, and placed in isolation. The Danish Health Authority would have also been given the power to define groups who must be vaccinated to contain and eliminate the disease.

More importantly, it would have allowed the government to call on the police to coerce people to be tested or vaccinated under threat of detainment.

Concerns about the new law led to its scrapping


Even before the new law was dropped, many had in Denmark had voiced their concerns about how it was giving the government too much power over healthcare.

“We think these are regulations that go too far and ought to be changed,” Camilla Rathcke, head of the Danish Medical Association, told Danish news outlet DR. Rathcke added that such power in the hands of the government could feel as though it was “overstepping boundaries” for individual patients.

The association has stated that it believes that mandatory vaccinations should be “an absolute last resort,” expressing concern that the law was infringing on patient’s legal rights.

Further criticism of the proposed law was on how it could force businesses and organizations to hand over information on staff and members to authorities. According to the Danish Council of Ethics, that would have promoted a culture of surveillance which “in no way benefits trust in society.”

Perhaps the biggest area of concern was how the new law would have allowed decisions to be made based on a “principle of caution.” The same is already allowed under the existing emergency law, allowing authorities to make decisions without conclusive scientific evidence.

Clearly, these concerns resonated with the Danish public. For nine days, protesters waged public protests outside the halls of the Folketing – Denmark’s parliament – leading to it eventually being dropped.

With the law dropped, the question now is how will the Danish government move forward. Will authorities try to extend the existing emergency law or will it try to force a new one?

Sources include:

Summit.news

TheLocal.dk 1

TheLocal.dk 2

DR.dk

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend