ACLU Celebrates Settlement Ending Unconstitutional Efforts to Silence Pipeline Protesters in South Dakota

Posted by on October 25, 2019 in Government, Policies, Politics with 0 Comments

Demonstrators protest against the Keystone XL pipeline, which the Trump administration is attempting to approve despite its disastrous environmental impact. (Photo: Rainforest Action Network/Bonnie Chan/Flickr/cc)

By Jessica Corbett | Common Dreams

The ACLU and environmental activists celebrated Thursday after reaching a settlement agreement with South Dakota’s Republican Gov. Kristi Noem and state Attorney General Jason Ravnesborg to end what critics called “their unconstitutional attempts to silence pipeline protestors.”

“We will celebrate this win but remain vigilant against further government attempts to outlaw our right to peacefully assemble.”
—Dallas Goldtooth, IEN

The settlement is a result of a lawsuit filed by the national ACLU, the group’s state chapter, and the Robins Kaplan law firm challenging provisions from various state laws, including South Dakota’s “Riot Boosting Act, which threatened activists with up to 25 years in prison. It follows a federal court ruling last month that temporarily blocked enforcement of the provisions.

“The state’s anti-protest efforts were plainly unconstitutional,” Stephen Pevar, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Racial Justice Program, said in a statement Thursday.

“This settlement helps ensure that no one has to fear the government coming after them for exercising their First Amendment right to protest,” he said. “This settlement should also serve as a lesson for other legislatures considering similar anti-protest efforts.”


The contested provisions of South Dakota’s laws are part of a trend of recently enacted, highly controversial legislation in a number of Republican-controlled states to criminalize protests, particularly those targeting “critical infrastructure” such as fossil fuel pipelines.

As ACLU staff attorney Vera Eidelman explained in a blog post-Thursday:

In the last few years, we have witnessed a legislative trend of states seeking to criminalize protest, deter political participation, and curtail freedom of association. These bills appear to be a direct reaction from politicians and corporations to some of the most effective tactics of those speaking out today, including water protectors challenging pipeline construction, Black Lives Matter, and those calling for boycotts of Israel. These legislative moves are aimed at suppressing dissent and undercutting marginalized and over-policed groups voicing concerns that disrupt current power dynamics.

In South Dakota specifically, several environmental and Indigenous groups—including those involved in the lawsuit that led to the settlement—have spent years protesting the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline.

Brendan Johnson, a partner with the Robins Kaplan law firm, said Thursday that “by equating peaceful organization and support of protest with ‘riot boosting’ and incitement to riot, the government stifled our clients’ abilities to speak out against the Keystone XL pipeline.”

“By equating peaceful organization and support of protest with ‘riot boosting’ and incitement to riot, the government stifled our clients’ abilities to speak out against the Keystone XL pipeline.”
—Brendan Johnson, attorney

Johnson’s firm and the ACLU represented the Sierra Club, Dakota Rural Action, the Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN), and NDN Collective, as well as two individuals from those groups.

“South Dakota knew these laws couldn’t stand up to our legal challenge so rather than face embarrassment they decided to capitulate,” one of the individual plaintiffs, IEN’s Dallas Goldtooth, said of the settlement, which still needs final approval from a federal court.

“We will celebrate this win,” Goldtooth added, “but remain vigilant against further government attempts to outlaw our right to peacefully assemble.”

The other individual plaintiff, Nick Tilsen of NDN Collective, called the state’s Riot Boosting Act “an insult to the Constitution and an attempt to muzzle the voices of the people and our movement to defend Mother Earth.”

“This settlement accomplishes everything that we set out do with the lawsuit and makes the temporary injunction a permanent one,” said Tilsen. “Onward, we will continue to fight for air, land, water, and our rights.”

Pre-construction activities are already underway for the Keystone XL pipeline, which when completed would carry up to 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily from the Alberta tar sands, across Montana and South Dakota, to Nebraska.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share it widely.

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

Tags: , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend