“It’s About Time”: Canada Celebrated for Banning Bee-Killing Neonics While US Backslides

Posted by on August 15, 2018 in Environment, Environmental Hazards, Wildlife with 0 Comments

The Canadian government on Wednesday unveiled plans to phase out pesticides that scientists have found are harmful to bees.

ByJessica Corbett | Common Dreams

“Unfortunately, it looks like the EPA is trying to be the last agency on Earth to recognize that these pesticides should be banned.”

While the Trump administration recently moved to roll back a ban on neonicotinoid pesticides in U.S. wildlife refuges, conservationists are celebrating Canada “for recognizing the overwhelming body of scientific evidence on neonics and phasing out these dangerous pesticides.”


“These bee-killing pesticides pose a serious threat to public health, the environment, and our entire food system,” declared Tiffany Finck-Haynes, a senior food futures campaigner for Friends of the Earth U.S., applauding the Canadian government’s new policy.

Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency on Wednesday unveiled plans to phase out two of the three main neonics currently allowed in the country. As The Canadian Press noted, “The agency has already announced plans to phase out the third pesticide in all outdoor uses, meaning it can’t be sprayed or used to pre-treat seeds before planting.”

“This is a really huge decision,” said John Bennett, a senior policy adviser at Friends of the Earth Canada.

Jim Coneybeare, president of the Ontario Beekeepers Association and a beekeeper in southwestern Ontario, told The Canadian Press that his beehives in areas exposed to neonics experience far greater losses, and he doesn’t understand why it will take so long to implement the new policy.

In a series of tweets, Faisal Moola, a scientist and professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario, also pointed out that the implementation period seemed unnecessarily lengthy, especially considering more urgent actions previousy adopted by France and the European Union (EU).


European regulators approved a “groundbreaking” and “historic” ban in April—a move that, as Common Dreams reported, was heralded as “a huge win for pollinators, people, and the planet” as well as “science-based regulation of pesticides.”

Although scientists and activists have urged the Trump administration to follow suit, disgraced former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt positioned himself as a lackey of the chemical industry, and his replacement, former coal lobbyist Andrew Wheeler, isn’t expected to be much better.

“Unfortunately, it looks like the EPA is trying to be the last agency on Earth to recognize that these pesticides should be banned,” concluded Finck-Haynes, who also blamed “leading food retailers” that “continue to disregard science.”

“In the U.S., both the EPA and corporations have failed to take appropriate action,” she said.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend