Thrive II Preview

Why Covid Treatments Are Being Suppressed: Just Do the Math | Lynne McTaggart

By Lynne McTaggart

As you know, I’m a research junkie and not much of a conspiracy theorist when it comes to COVID-19 or anything else.

But I have to wonder why, faced with a worldwide pandemic, that governments and the media are all ignoring solid scientific evidence from doctors of treatments demonstrated to lower the incessant mortality rate of COVID-19.


I bet you’ve never heard of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

When the pandemic struck, a number of doctors from major academic medical centers, with some 200 years’ worth of combined experience in critical care medicine, plus about 1000 published papers in scientific journals under their belts, called an emergency meeting after noticing that the vast majority of critically ill COVID patients given the standard treatment recommended by national and international health care organizations were dying.

The greatest mystery of all, to their minds, was why so many patients were dying of acute respiratory failure.

They decided to form a working group to find a treatment protocol for COVID-19, particularly for patients going into intensive care units.


The group specifically sought out Dr. Paul Marik, a professor of medicine and chief of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfork, Virginia.

Marik is expert in treating ICU patients with severe infections like bacterial sepsis, and it was he who first developed what he called a ‘HAT’ treatment – a mix of Hydrocortisone (a steroid), intravenous Ascorbic acid (high dose vitamin C), and intravenous Thiamine (vitamin B1) for such patients. Published studies have since shown that this treatment can achieve high survival rates.

Dubbing themselves the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, Marik and his colleagues met extensively, studied all the clinical and pathological data about COVID, and began discussions with a number of frontline intensive care unit experts working in some of the early outbreak areas, like China, Italy and New York.

To Marik and these other concerned doctors, COVID seemed to be behaving a bit like sepsis. They figured they could get better results with the sickest patients by tweaking Marik’s initial protocol.

After comparing notes of what was working with what wasn’t, they formulated the MATH+ treatment protocol, specifically for hospitalized patients, and launched it in March 2020.

The MATH part of MATH+ stands for intravenous Methylprednisolone (another steroid), high dose intravenous Ascorbic acid, high dose Thiamine, and Heparin (to prevent blood clotting).

The ‘plus’ stands for optional further interventions: melatonin, zinc, vitamin D3, a statin, famotidine (an H2 blocker used to treat indigestion or stomach ulcers), and intravenous magnesium.

Here’s the full protocol:  https://COVID19criticalcare.com/math-hospital-treatment/pdf-translations/

In their research, the FLCCC Alliance discovered that when given intravenously in these emergency situations, steroids like prednisolone and vitamin C work together synergistically to improve survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Thiamine helps the body optimize its ability to use oxygen and can protect the heart and immune system, and heparin is a well established anti-coagulant –  useful in this instance because critically ill COVID patients show excessive levels of blood clotting.

The other ‘plus’ interventions all have been shown to help with specific symptoms.

Although the Alliance created a website and published the MATH+ protocol in many languages back in March, as of this writing only two centers have systematically employed it to treat hospitalized COVID patients: the United Memorial Hospital in Houston, Texas, and Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia.

Nevertheless, the Alliance has been keeping careful track of those hospital patients under this regime, and on August 5, revealed a case study of the results: of more than 300 patients treated early on with the MATH+ protocol, average hospital mortality was about 5 percent, compared with an average mortality of nearly 23 percent of patients in hospitals in the US, Italy, and China who were given the standard protocols

So this begs an obvious question. Here you have a team of eminent specialists, who devised a system to treat serious cases of COVID that reduces mortality by at least five times – from nearly one in four patients to one in 20.

Why is this not being adopted by every hospital and every government around the world? By the Centers for Disease Control, by NICE in the UK, by the World Health Organization?

If you want to figure out why just pull out your calculator. The UK has just signed a deal for six experimental vaccines with Belgian pharmaceutical company Janssen and the US biotech company Novavax, for a total stockpile to 340 million doses – enough to vaccinate every British man, woman, and child five times.

In America, the US government has spent about $10 billion over a deal with  Moderna, Inc. to manufacture and deliver 100 million doses of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate.

With this deal, the US government has turned into a pharmaceutical company, owning (and presumably profiting from) these vaccine doses.

It’s also made a separate deal with drug giant Pfizer for a total of nearly $2 billion in investment – ensuring that Pfizer will have a market for its drug, even before it has been created.

Overall, after splitting its revenue with its partner BioNTech, Pfizer is due to make an estimated $13 billion by the end of next year –  about the same as its all-time bestselling drug Lipitor during its most popular year.

Big Pharma, in turn, has been showering the US Congress with some $11 million in campaign contributions thus far this year. The PAC for Pfizer sent some 548 checks to lawmakers – more than any other drug company.

Now compare the gigantic money at stake here with the kinds of profits these drug companies will make with what’s used in the Alliance’s protocol: a few out-of-patent drugs and some intravenous vitamins.

You want to know why you haven’t heard about the Marik and his alliance?

It’s simple. Just do the math.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

1 Reader Comment

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. johnironbear@gmail.com' John Michael Christian says:

    Thank you for the research and article, this one is new to me. There’s also another that most people don’t know which is taking 500mg of Quercetin and 25mg of Zinc, and of course there is hydroxychloroquine which has be used for Sars related problems for decades but was “banned” by the FDA suddenly after the Covid outbreak. President Trump even used it as a preventative. I had Covid in mid March and I took high doses of Vitamin C and D3 and I was fine in less than three days and I’m 70 years old, so this is not a big deal if we’re healthy.

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend