By Jeffrey A. Tucker | American Institute for Economic Research
Those of us who have been reading and writing on lockdowns and the Covid-19 virus have been frustrated in competition with media frenzy and disinformation. Many times since February or so, I imagined that the latest study would put an end to the fake-science silliness and highly damaging lockdowns. But it kept not happening. The lockdowns have continued on and on regardless of the evidence against them.
Getting reliable information out there in the public sphere has depended in large part on independent venues to break through the noise.
One of the best videographers and analysts on the topic is Ivor Cummins, an engineer-trained thinker who has worked to summarize the best science and data. Below you will find his latest video that brings enormous clarity to the topic based on data and evidence from all over the world. I am posting it here because it strikes me as the single best source to understand virus patterns and policy responses. It is presented without hype or ideology, in the interest of more clarity. It is absolutely worth your 40 minutes of time.
Jeffrey A. Tucker
Jeffrey A. Tucker is Editorial Director for the American Institute for Economic Research. He is the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and eight books in 5 languages, most recently The Market Loves You. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture. Jeffrey is available for speaking and interviews via his email. Tw | FB | LinkedIn
The data presented in this article is both empirical and irrefutable. As such, it serves as incontrovertible evidence against the Draconian measures being mandated by the “global web of authority.” And that begs monstrous questions.
If masking, if socially distancing, if crowd control are all non-factors in stemming the spread of viruses, why is the public not only being deliberately misinformed but also legally compelled to comply to such demands? Is it to ensure compromised immune systems? Is it to guarantee a worldwide supply of “tinder” for “the real thing” when it is clandestinely “delivered” to the global population?
Let us name the shadowy few who want the world’s peoples to robotically line up for mandatory mass public vaccination and examine their satanic methodology to “provide the problem, stoke the reaction, and exact their solution.”