EU Court Upholds Ban on Bayer’s Bee-Killing Pesticides in Landmark Ruling Against ‘Powerful Multinationals’

Posted by on May 11, 2021 in Eco-Friendly, Environment with 0 Comments

By Kenny Stancil | The Defender

The EU’s top court ruled May 6 in favor of the European Commission’s partial ban on three pesticides hazardous to bees, much to the chagrin of Bayer — the German pharmaceutical and biotech company that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018.

Bayer attempted to overturn the ban and undermine the EU’s “precautionary principle” for the protection of environmental and human health, but the European Court of Justice dismissed the corporation’s appeal and backed a lower court’s 2018 decision to uphold restrictions on the use of some pesticides on certain crops. In 2013, the Commission banned the use of imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam—three bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides — on maize, rapeseed, and some cereals.

“The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people’s health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals and that the precautionary principle is a cornerstone of EU law,” Greenpeace EU legal strategist Andrea Carta said in response to the top court’s ratification of the ban.

“This means the EU has a responsibility and the power to ensure the safety of all pesticides, chemicals, GM crops, and other dangerous products and substances,” said Carta.

While hailing the “landmark decision,” Greenpeace EU warned that it “does not mean an end to threats to bees and other pollinators in the EU.”

“EU courts have again ruled that bees and other essential insects should be protected from dangerous pesticides, but governments continue to dish out exemptions and hold up attempts to put in place effective safety testing,” said Carta. “This ruling shows they must adopt rigorous testing rules without further delay.”

According to Reuters, 206 emergency authorizations were granted for the use of the neonicotinoids in the EU between 2013 and 2019, and the ban did not prevent the use of the toxic substances on other crops, such as sugar beet. “EU auditors last year said this pesticide use, while legal, was thought to be responsible for honeybee losses,” the news outlet reported.

In addition, Greenpeace EU pointed out, “Research also indicates that several other pesticides currently used in the EU are a threat to bees and other pollinating insects, including four more neonicotinoids not covered by the 2013 ban.”

Reuters noted that the commission, in an effort to protect bees, has proposed targets to reduce the EU’s use of pesticides by 50% and to cut fertilizer use by 20% by 2030.

Originally published by Common Dreams.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend