Elon Musk’s Plan to Save Humanity from the Artificial Intelligence Apocalypse

image_pdfimage_print

By Jake Anderson | The Anti-Media

(ANTIMEDIA) Last week, Elon Musk confirmed that his company, NeuraLink, is working on the development of a brain-machine interface (BMI). For the last couple of years, Musk has made no secret of his fears of artificial intelligence advancing to the point where it overtakes its human creators. Musk believes that in order to safeguard the human race against a superintelligent machine apocalypse, we must essentially become them: cyborgs whose minds are internally augmented by advanced computer systems. Along the way, he believes, this transition will spawn countless benefits — and profitable industries — for humans.

The concept of a brain-machine interface (BMI) remained in the realm of science fiction until fairly recently. Now there are multiple private endeavors and even a DARPA-led coalition. Currently, there are three early BMI models: motor cortex stimulation, artificial ears and eyes, and deep brain stimulation.

“We are aiming to bring something to market that helps with certain severe brain injuries (stroke, cancer lesion, congenital) in about four years,” Musk stated.

But these are just the earliest manifestations of what Musk believes will soon be a thriving industry. Tim Urban’s post at Wait But Why (make sure you have a head-scratching hour before you read) fleshed out some of the grittier details of what he basically refers to as the next phase of intelligent life on earth: the Wizard Era.

Musk envisions a world in which humans are outfitted with micro-sized “neural lace” technology. When it reaches its full potential, the effects will be nothing short of mind-blowing. We will be able to control physical objects with our thoughts, have conversations between minds with no words, and literally live other people’s experiences, including all forms of physical activity. Think of it as an amalgam of virtual reality and augmented reality but without any physical devices and telepathically controlled, a new “digital tertiary” layer of the brain.

Musk believes there will be therapeutic benefits, as well. By recording their neural patterns, people will be able to better manage psychiatric and emotional problems, heighten their sensory perceptions, and vastly augment their knowledge base with a cloud-based memory and knowledge storage. With such advanced emotional communication, there will be an opportunity to instill a greater sense of empathy in people, as they will actually experience what it feels like to be someone else.

But with great promise comes great peril. Musk acknowledges there are risks involved, such as mind hacking, trolling, and surveillance. All the normal destructive tendencies of humans may follow us up the ladder. As for as people reading our thoughts, though, Musk says not to worry:

People won’t be able to read your thoughts—you would have to will it. If you don’t will it, it doesn’t happen. Just like if you don’t will your mouth to talk, it doesn’t talk.

Musk believes that with OpenAI, his open-source non-profit artificial intelligence research company, he can democratize AI technology. Combined with NeuraLink, he believes this will lessen the existential risk posed by superintelligent machines by allowing us to keep up with the pace of augmentation.

Will humans embrace becoming machines? Musk, echoing futurist Ray Kurzweil, thinks the symbiosis will be natural, and that it has already started:

“The thing that people, I think, don’t appreciate right now is that they are already a cyborg. You’re already a different creature than you would have been twenty years ago or even ten years ago. You’re already a different creature. You can see this when they do surveys of like, ‘How long do you want to be away from your phone?’ and—particularly if you’re a teenager or in your 20s—even a day hurts. If you leave your phone behind, it’s like missing limb syndrome. I think people—they’re already kind of merged with their phone and their laptop and their applications and everything.”

There will be plenty of skeptics who believe this kind of technology is impossible, or that it won’t solve basic underlying problems with human civilization. But if humans are hardwired to be the way they are, if nature has coded them to have certain instincts and truths, perhaps they can be rewired and recoded in a way that frees them from biology. It certainly seems at least possible that a brain-machine interface could be the game-changing paradigm shift that allows humans to finally understand one another and achieve communion. That’s when the real advancement can begin.

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Read more great articles at The Anti-Media.

Tags: , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

2 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Skarobotarmyab@aol.com' Abbie Cianfrocco says:

    Machines are super great and all, but at 30 yrs of age I’ve come to the conclusion that nothing is as amazing as the human mind. Why would we want anything man made to compete with? Are natural means obsolete? When they don’t work we force our way just like we take over land and fight for what we believe is right rather than live out our days in peace the best we can. I think the age old desire to live forever is being unfolded; the fear of disease and dying is taking over. Life to be made glorious as it is has become jaded. People want more and will always want more I suppose this is the human way. We will take over the universe then and soon will be face to face with what we came here to hide from in the first place. Hopefully our planet will survive…
    😲😙

  2. Falcon Britt says:

    Anytime a species becomes dependent upon an environmental item, it is thereby weakened, not strengthened. It is more likely to go extinct. We should develop our own mental capacities and telepathy instead – those are organic strengths that have been stunted in us by overdependency on technology already. When the device stops working or is unavailable or doesn’t have batteries, the human will have atrophied in his native innate capabilities. Worse, however, putting technology into your body makes you vulnerable to manipulation by those who produce the product. They can put nanites into them if they want to control you, or have them emit wavelengths (which they are already using in directed energy weaponry) to plant actual voices or thoughts or emotions in your head. You become a controllable borg. The voice-to-skull technology is why the Iraqis threw down all their weapons instead of fighting – they heard “Allah” in their heads telling them not to fight. That was projected long distance by our side – can you imagine how much they could harass or control you with an implant they put in your head (or anywhere in your body, actually)? No thanks, this is NOT an advancement, it’s a ploy by those seeking total domination of humanity (because there are too many of us to stay so downtrodden much longer, and they know it). Gigi Young is right, we should be developing our own organic gifts. Australian aborigines use telepathy in the Outback, and we have the ability too, although we have allowed it to atrophy. If we practice it enough, we could be done with cell phones that irradiate us – low tech can be healthier than high tech for us and for the planet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend