EKAM WORLD PEACE FESTIVAL

Boston City Council Bans Facial Recognition Surveillance

Posted by on June 25, 2020 in Government, Policies with 0 Comments

The technology has been criticized for racial bias in identifying subjects. (Photo: Fight for the Future)

By Eoin Higgins | Common Dreams

The Boston City Council on Wednesday unanimously voted to ban the city from the use of facial recognition technology, making the Massachusetts capital the ninth city in the country and the second largest to do so.


“This is a historic day for Boston where the budget conversation is really focused on shifting resources away from police and towards the community,” civil liberties advocacy group Muslim Justice League tweeted. “And the conversation will not end here! We want community control over budgeting.”

The council cited the technology's inaccuracy incorrectly identifying people of color as the main reason for rejecting its use by the city.

“Boston should not use racially discriminatory technology that threatens the privacy and basic rights of our residents,” council member Michelle Wu said in a statement.

On Tuesday, the Santa Cruz, California city council voted unanimously to end the use of facial recognition technology—and the use of predictive policing—by the city. Civil liberties community organization Oakland Privacy welcomed the decision in a statement from advocacy director Tracy Rosenberg.

“All over the country, people are calling for transformational changes in how policing is done,” said Rosenberg. “Walking away from intrusive and invasive surveillance technologies that have never been free of racial bias is one big step on that road.”

A false facial recognition match in Michigan resulted in the arrest of innocent Michigan resident Robert Williams, who is Black, in January. The Michigan ACLU filed a complaint about the arrest on Wednesday just before the Boston vote.

“What happened to Robert Williams and his family should be a wake-up call for lawmakers,” said Evan Greer, deputy director of technology with the advocacy group Fight for the Future. “Facial recognition is doing harm right now.”

Massachusetts ACLU executive director Carol Rose in a statement Wednesday on the vote referred to Williams' case.

“This is a crucial victory for our privacy rights and for people like Robert Williams, who have been arrested for crimes they didn't commit because of a technology law enforcement shouldn't be using,” said Rose.

Rose added that leaders around the country should follow the example from Boston and other municipalities that have banned facial recognition.

“Lawmakers nationwide should follow suit and immediately stop law enforcement use of this technology,” said Rose. “This surveillance technology is dangerous when right, and dangerous when wrong.”

The group's Kade Crockford told WBUR that the ramifications of allowing the technology to be used by the city could have dangerous effects down the line.

“Let's just ensure that we put the policy horse before the technology cart and lead with our values so we don't accidentally wake up someday in a dystopian surveillance state,” said Crockford.

“Behind the scenes,” Crockford added, “police departments and technology companies have created an architecture of oppression that is very difficult to dismantle.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share it widely.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend