By Kerry Pieri | Yahoo Lifestyle
Maybe I’ve listened to too many SuperSoul Sunday podcast episodes, but the derisive response to Marianne Williamson after the first Democratic debate surprised me. Perhaps I thought that all her love talk and spiritual open-mindedness had gone mainstream, but the mocking memes that followed were a rude awakening.
Articles and tweets quickly positioned the presidential candidate as some sort of New Age space cadet with no handle on reality, and the words “woo woo” were used too often in reference to the New York Times best-selling author.
Marianne Williamson calling New Zealand to talk about harnessing love: pic.twitter.com/T2mYjc94WL
— Nick Jack Pappas (@Pappiness) June 28, 2019
Cut to the second round of debates, which aired Tuesday and Wednesday nights this week. Though Williamson was given only nine minutes to speak (less than half of many of her counterparts), she arguably made the biggest impact. She was the most Googled candidate in 49 states, with GOP pollster Frank Luntz claiming, “She’s cutting through the clutter tonight.”
Still, the memes continue. Some articles claim her rise is “scary,” while Twitter users label her “crazy,” and The Daily Beast refers to her approach as “New Age-y schtick.”
In some ways, Williamson is the anti-Trump, combating his hate speech with love speech. During the first debate, she declared that her first call as president would be to the prime minister of New Zealand, whose goal is to “make New Zealand the place where it’s the best place in the world for a child to grow up,” Williamson explained onstage. “I will tell her, ‘Girlfriend, you are so on,’ because the United States of America is going to be the best place in the world for a child to grow up.” Instead of discussing her place in the debates, news sites either rounded up memes or compared her words to those of a popular video game.
Here’s the thing: In a time when American children are being gunned down in schools and where the mortality rate for babies on their first day of life is higher in the United States than any other developed country, stating that you want children to grow up happy shouldn’t be cause for snickering.
Throughout her campaign, Williamson talks more about ideas than plans. Some people might see that as an inability to lead, but when inciting the darkest parts of humanity helped win the previous election, trying to appeal to the light side doesn’t sound like such a bad idea. In other words, it’s not so much people’s response to Williamson the person as it is to her philosophy that I find unsettling. She’s doing her best to move the conversation to one of peace and love instead of anger and division. What is so laughable about that?
Williamson said, “If you think we’re going to beat Donald Trump by just having all these plans, you’ve got another thing coming. Because he didn’t win by saying he had a plan. He won by simply saying ‘make America great again.’” It was never about taxes or keeping your gun, it was about resuscitating the ugliest parts of America. And it worked.
https://twitter.com/poniewozik/status/1144609872236961792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1144609872236961792&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo.com%2Flifestyle%2Fdont-vote-marianne-williamson-just-154400895.html
The candidate opened last Tuesday night’s debate saying, “We the American people must rise up and do what we do best and create a new possibility, say no to what we don’t want and yes to what we know can be true.” This doesn’t have the same ring as “no new taxes,” but that didn’t work out so well in the end anyway.
