Verizon Announces 20 More U.S. Cities to Get 5G Despite Telecom Admitting No Studies Say It’s Safe, Widespread Opposition, 5G Failure, and Future Lawsuits

Written by on April 28, 2019 in Environment, Environmental Hazards with 1 Comment

By B.N. Frank | Activist Post

Telecom Industry executives cannot offer ANY scientific evidence that 5G is harmless and there is research that has already proven 5G IS harmful.

Last year the first 5G court case was won in England after residents became sick and women delivered stillborn babies. A growing number of communities in the U.S. and around the world are trying to keep 5G out of their communities.  (See also 12, 3, 4, 5678910).

Verizon acknowledged in 2014 that future lawsuits and settlements were probable due to their cell phones and towers.  But whatever.  On Thursday, they released the names of 20 additional U.S. cities that will get 5G Ultra Wideband service in 2019: Atlanta, Boston, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dallas, Des Moines, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Little Rock, Memphis, Phoenix, Providence, San Diego, Salt Lake City and Washington DC.  That’s right – other U.S. cities already have 5G from Verizon and other telecom companies (See 12)  New Yorkers were complaining about it last summer because they were becoming sick from it and their pets were too.

On top of that – some Verizon 5G projects are already failing and more are predicted to fail.  Of course, since American taxpayers seem to have paid for 5G anyway, why should Verizon care? 

From CBS Sacramento“Research Firm Believes Verizon 5G Home In Sacramento May Not Succeed”:


Sacramento is one of four US cities where Verizon began rolling out fixed wireless broadband last October and an analysis conducted specifically in Sacramento by MoffettNathanson Research suggests that nearly six months later, fewer than one-tenth of one percent of people living in single-family homes here have signed up for the service. The study concedes that while multi-family dwellings could boost the percentage, it was not possible to determine the number of subscribers in a large apartment and condominium complexes.

[…]

The research revealed that the 273 small 5G cell sites installed by Verizon under an agreement with the city of Sacramento cover less than six percent of residential addresses in the seven zip codes analyzed — and of those eligible addresses, fewer than half have signed on with Verizon.

A previous analysis of Verizon 5G Home in Sacramento by EJL Wireless Research focused on the technical challenges facing the service which uses millimeter wave technology with a very short range. The author of that report estimated Verizon would need as many as 4,000 5G sites to adequately cover Sacramento.

While addressing the technical issues involving Verizon 5G Home, the MoffettNathanson analysis focuses more on the potential profitability of the service. The report concludes that Verizon’s assumption that wireless broadband is cheaper to deploy than fiber is flawed, and offers a model showing the cost of running fiber to subscribers’ homes system-wide could actually be 64 percent cheaper than installing small cell wireless.

From ExtremeTech.com“Report: Verizon’s Fixed 5G Broadband Service Economically Flawed, Unsustainable”:

According to MoffettNathanson, only six percent of homes in Sacramento had access to Verizon 5G, with fewer than three percent actually subscribed. Of greater concern than the low subscriber numbers, however, is how few customers each small cell can actually support. On average, each small cell can only reach 27 local addresses.

But who cares, right?  Verizon is promoting a new contest to help alleviate future costs for installing more 5G.  They simply won’t stop campaigning.  It may be even grosser than the sweaty side effects from 5G exposure.

About 2 weeks ago, there was a press conference from the White House about forced 5G small cell installation and the U.S. needs to win the controversial “Race for 5G.” There was little reference to 5G opposition.  There was no reference to the testimony provided by the Telecom Industry that they could provide no scientific studies that proved 5G wireless technology was biologically or environmentally safe. 

President Trump emphasized that 5G networks must be secured which according to most security experts seems completely unrealistic.  He mentioned that The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been taking bold action – maybe bolder than they’ve ever taken – to ensure 5G would be installed all across the country, above ground and below as well as in space.

Bold indeed – The FCC is supposed to regulate the Telecom Industry and protect the public even though it seems like they have been doing everything but for 20+ years.  (See 123456)

In regard to 5G:

  1. The FCC is being investigated for collusion with the Telecom Industry.
  2. Lawsuits have also been filed against the FCC about forced 5G installation (See 12).
  3. There was a bill introduced in January that would overturn forced federal 5G installation in local communities.

200+ doctors and scientists have been demanding a moratorium on 5G installation since 2017.

Research has also already determined that exposure to 1G through 4G wireless radiation IS NOT SAFE EITHER.  Federal “safety” standards are 20+ years old and they DO NOT apply to the way we use or are exposed to wireless technology today.

The U.S Day of Action against 5G is on May 15.  For more information on what you can do, visit the following websites:

Provide, protect and profit from what is coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

Read more great articles at Activist Post.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

1 Reader Comment

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. jeffhand409@yahoo.com' jeff says:

    Does Verizon really think 5G is good for business? I just dumped them due to inferior service and after reading this, I’m glad I did.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend