1

Leaked Dept. of Defense Document Reveals Evidence of Widespread VACCINE FAILURE

Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder | GreenMedinfo

A leaked Department of Defense document first reported on by attorney Tom Rentz reveals high rates of “breakthrough” infections (4% of which died) and hospitalizations within a cohort of 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries all of whom were fully vaccinated.

An astounding PowerPoint document posted on the Humetrix company website, titled “Waning Effect of COVID-19 Vaccines in 5.6M U.S. Study Cohort, Weekly Update 9/28/2021,” stamped by the Department of Defense JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER’s Project Salus (an AI-driven analytics platform named after the Roman goddess of safety and well-being), reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines are clearly not living up to their stated promises of being highly effective — something that should be obvious to anyone watching the aggressive push to add regular “boosters” on top of a failing two-dose regimen.

Within a cohort of 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccines (2.7 million Pfizer and 2.9 million Moderna), there was still a cumulative breakthrough rate (i.e., vaccine failure rate) of 2.9%, along with a 21% hospitalization rate in “breakthrough infections.” Among breakthrough hospitalizations, 31% required ICU care, and there was a 4% death rate overall among “breakthrough infections.”

This data clearly proves that the official narrative claiming the vaccines are unequivocally “effective,” with no questions allowed to be asked, is patently false.

Are Vaccine Side Effects Being Labeled ‘Breakthrough Infections’?

At first glance, it appears that the incontrovertible evidence of widespread vaccine failure described in this document is being driven by the so-called vaccine-resistant “delta variant,” taking the focus off the clearly ineffective vaccines themselves, and perhaps setting the public up for endless “boosters.” But there is another possibility which you will not hear discussed elsewhere but is worth considering…

It is quite possible that the tremendous side effects known to be caused by these experimental mRNA vaccines are being knowingly or unknowingly misidentified, misclassified, or otherwise relabeled as “breakthrough infections,” generating the illusion that a new or old variant of a novel coronavirus is responsible for the symptoms caused by the vaccines’ side effects; side effects that, as of yet, neither world governments, the global media nor the medical-industrial establishment will acknowledge even exist, despite overwhelming evidence from government databases such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) or Vigibase that this vaccine (arguably more a gene therapy than a vaccine) is causing unprecedented harms and deaths among those who take them and who have been deprived of any semblance of informed consent, a mandatory medical ethical principle.

According to slide 7 of 17, titled “Total & Breakthrough Cases in the 65 Years and Older Salus Cohort,” in the 65 and older population where the fully vaccinated rate is 80% “an estimated 71% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.”

There are a number of ways to interpret this data. Either the vaccines do not work in the majority of those who receive them, or, worse, they suppress innate immunity against COVID-19 or any of its supposed variants, or, as I refer to above, the vaccines’ adverse events (which include classical symptoms of influenza-like illness and/or those attributed to COVID-19) are being misidentified and miscategorized as new “breakthrough” cases or the “delta variant.”

This latter explanation becomes all the more plausible when you consider that the “gold standard” tool for identifying COVID-19 cases are PCR tests, which is not capable of diagnosing replication-competent viruses or viral infections. Kari Mullis, the technology inventor himself, made this clear. You can learn more about Mullis’ views, work, and the problem with PCR tests here.

The Underlying Reason Why the Vaccines Are Failing?

As a quick aside, I think it is important to explain that when a cell is damaged, it releases nucleic acids (e.g., apoptotic bodies, necrotic bodies, exosomes), some of which end up in the plasma and can be mistaken as exogenous viral sequences by a PCR test.

Vaccines can cause profound damage to the integrity of the cell, which generates the illusion of an elevated “viral load,” when, in fact, the markers for elevated exogenous or “foreign” nucleic acids are coming from the body’s natural responses (i.e., attempts to survive and heal) to the exogenous and xenobiotic toxicants and/or autoimmune generating effects of the vaccinations themselves.

While this slide kit does not address this possibility, it may help explain the underlying reason why the vaccines are clearly failing (as well as the unprecedented signals of harm associated with them) without falling prey to the “escape variant” or “delta variant” narrative, which is being used to argue for boosters, further pharmaceutical drug intervention and, ultimately, to further consolidate and weaponize the narrative that there is an extremely dangerous set of viruses out there that require unconstitutional executive orders to completely suspend our basic human, civil and constitutionally backed rights.


View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.

Slide 8 of 17, titled “Is mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Against Delta Infection Warning Over Time in 65 Years and Older Salus Cohort?,” details how “Breakthrough infection rates 5-6 months post-vaccination are twice as high as 3-4 months post-vaccination.” In other words, the longer the duration after vaccination the weaker their immunity and poorer their health becomes.

This, for me, is an indication that the mRNA technology is creating an overall downward trend in the recipient’s health, which is an explanation consistent with the alarming signals of harm associated with the vaccines, as evidenced by multiple government database sources, such as the U.S. government’s VAERS and the World Health Organization’s VigiBase. A recent estimate by Steve Kirsch presented at an FDA hearing proposes that about 200,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 vaccines thus far. Watch his presentation here.

 


View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.

In slide 12 of 17, titled “Total & Breakthrough Hospitalizations in the 65 Years and Older Cohort,” the slide proposes, “As Delta variant surged to over 50% in June, COVID-19 hospitalizations more than doubled, reversing the prior trend of decreasing hospitalizations since April.”

Once again, this explanation is suspect given that there is little to no evidence that a Delta variant is driving hospitalizations, whereas we know that the hundreds of adverse events listed in the VAERS database related to the vaccines’ effects can indeed be life-threatening and do drive people to the hospital, despite the fact that as few as 1% of these events are reported by hospitals to the government.1


This Tennessean article is one of many investigative reports that have concluded a Delta variant test does not exist yet for the public. 

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admits that it only does about 700 Delta variant tests per week, and this is assuming we can trust them to tell the public the truth — see the proposed Federal Grand Jury investigation of the CDC for violating federal law by hyperinflating COVID-19 death stats here). The CDC then extrapolated the data to “estimate” what it says is affecting the public at large, which the media promulgates as unquestionable truth. And so, one could rightfully interpret their statement, “As Delta variant surged to over 50% in June …,” to mean, “As Vaccine Adverse Events surged … in June.”

The slide also states, “In this 80% vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.”

Again, this could mean that the COVID-19 vaccines caused hospitalizations that were wrongly attributed to COVID-19 and/or its “variants,” because we know that all it requires for someone to be labeled a COVID-19 case, or even to be pronounced dead by a coroner or medical examiner “by COVID-19,” is suspicion of infection, thanks to the WHO changing the ICD emergency use codes early in 2020, and the CDC following suit and doing the same in March 2020.

We also know that the medical industry, the government, and the media are actively censoring and suppressing any link between the vaccines and the hundreds of known serious side effects associated with them, making it virtually impossible for official accounts of vaccine reactions to be openly linked back to the vaccines, much less discussed. It’s much easier to blame “COVID-19” or “the Delta variant.”


View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.

Slide 17 of 17, titled “Risk Model for Breakthrough Hospitalization,” contains two important observations:

  1. “Risk of breakthrough hospitalization increases with time elapsed since mRNA vaccination with odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post-vaccination.” Is it the “breakthrough” virus or viruses driving these hospitalizations or the vaccines’ many known side effects? This is the important question that the slide kit creators do not ask.
  2. “Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough infection.” In other words, NATURAL IMMUNITY protects against going to the hospital even among those already vaccinated. Phrased differently: contracting COVID-19 (or what might be mistakenly labeled COVID-19 but is actually influenza-like illness) and surviving it is the best protection against hospitalization, confirming what we already know and believe as natural health advocates.

Help Spread the Truth

This remarkable document should be shared widely. Considering the widespread censorship of information like this, we hope that you will continue to be brave with us and get the word out.

Documents like these come directly from the government and cannot be easily written off as conspiracy theories. The more people who wake up to the fact that the vaccines do not work as advertised and are not nearly as safe as we are told, the greater chance we have of preserving our right to informed choice when it comes to our bodies.

Don’t forget to join the Stand for Health Freedom digital advocacy portal and sign up on the waiting list for the upcoming release of our FREE SPEECH platform here. If you like what we do, please consider becoming a member or making a one-time donation.

New to the Greenmedinfo.com newsletter? Get free access here.  Follow us on social media via our Telegram feed here.


Reference

1. Electronic Support for Public Health-Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
© October 5, 2021 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here //www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.



Heart Inflammation Linked to COVID Vaccines in Study of U.S. Military, Department of Defense Confirms

By Megan Redshaw | The Defender

new study of U.S. service members found higher than expected rates of heart inflammation following receipt of a COVID vaccine. It’s a finding Defense Department researchers say should call attention to the condition, known as myocarditis, as a potential side effect of vaccinations.

In a study published June 29 in JAMA Cardiology, U.S. military physicians described 23 cases of myocarditis in previously healthy males who developed the condition within four days of receiving a COVID vaccine.

total of 23 male patients (22 currently serving in the military and 1 retiree) with a median age range of 25 years were evaluated between January and April 2021 for acute-onset chest pain following vaccination with an mRNA COVID vaccine.

All military members were previously healthy with a high level of fitness. They were physically fit by military standards and lacked any known history of cardiac disease, significant cardiac risk factors, or exposure to cardiotoxic agents.

Seven military members received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine and 16 received the Moderna vaccine. Each patient had a final diagnosis of myocarditis without infectious, ischemic, or autoimmune etiologies identified. Diagnoses were reviewed and met the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) case definition criteria for probable myocarditis.

All patients presented with acute chest pain and significantly elevated cardiac troponin levels (10-fold to 400-fold the upper limits of their respective reference ranges) with symptom onset within 12 to 96 hours following COVID vaccination.

According to the study, physicians expected to find eight or fewer cases of myocarditis among the 436,000 male military members who received two mRNA doses. But 20 military members developed inflammation after their second dose, including 14 after the Moderna shot and six after the Pfizer shot. Three developed myocarditis after their first vaccine.

Cardiac symptoms resolved within a week of onset for 16 patients, but seven continued to have chest pain at the time of publication.

The researchers stated that while the true incidence of myocarditis is unknown at this time, the presentation pattern and clinical course suggest an association with an inflammatory response to vaccination.

The team concluded that increased attention to myocarditis as a potential adverse event following vaccination is warranted.

A new study supports the link between mRNA COVID vaccines and heart inflammation

A separate study published in JAMA Cardiology on June 29 investigated seven cases of acute myocarditis. Four cases occurred within five days of COVID vaccination between Feb. 1 and April 30.

All four patients had received the second dose of an mRNA vaccine and presented with severe chest pain, had biomarker evidence of myocardial injury, were hospitalized, and had test results consistent with myocarditis.

“It is possible that these four cases of acute myocarditis represent a rare, potential adverse event linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccination,” researchers wrote. “The findings from the present report raise the possibility of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and acute myocarditis.”

An association between COVID vaccines and myocarditis was first reported in Israel with a case study in February involving a 19-year-old male.

On April 26, details leaked from an Israeli Health Ministry report raising concerns among experts about a possible link between the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine and myocarditis.

preliminary report by an Israeli committee tasked with monitoring vaccine side effects found 62 cases of myocarditis, including two deaths, in people who received the Pfizer vaccine. Fifty-six cases occurred after the second dose of the vaccine, and 55 cases occurred in men — most between the ages of 18 and 30.

The two patients who died were reportedly healthy until receiving the vaccine and had no pre-existing conditions.

On April 27, Reuters reported the U.S. Department of Defense was investigating 14 cases of heart inflammation among people who were vaccinated through the military’s health services.

On June 2, Israeli health officials confirmed a probable link between Pfizer’s COVID vaccine and dozens of cases of heart inflammation in young men following the second dose.

As The Defender reported June 10, the CDC’s advisory committee acknowledged a higher-than-expected number of cases of heart inflammation among 16- to 24-year-olds who recently received a second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines.

Based on a May 24 report from the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group (VaST), the CDC on June 1 updated its website with the following language:

“Data from VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System] show that in the 30-day window following dose 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, there was a higher number of observed than expected myocarditis/pericarditis cases in 16–24-year-olds.”

On June 23, the ACIP said there was a “likely association” of “mild” heart inflammation in adolescents and young adults after vaccination with an mRNA COVID vaccine, and a warning statement was warranted.

The safety panel acknowledged more than 1,200 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis in 16- to-24-year-olds who received an mRNA COVID vaccine, mostly occurring in males after the second dose.

As The Defender reported June 28, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to Pfizer and Moderna’s fact sheets indicating an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination.

According to the latest data from VAERS, there were 1,342  cases of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) in all age groups reported in the U.S. following COVID vaccination between Dec.14, 2020 and June 18, 2021.

Of the 1,342 cases reported, 835 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 458 cases to Moderna and 45 cases to Johnson & Johnson’s COVID vaccine.




Pentagon’s Top-Secret UFO Unit to Brief Senate as Ex-Official Says ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Found

By Elias Marat | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

(TMU) – As secretive unit operating within the U.S. Department of Defense that is charged with investigating unidentified flying objects (UFOs) will make some of its findings public after it was revealed that the Pentagon has been recently briefed about “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”

The once-covert UFO unit, which operates within the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Intelligence, will soon begin giving regular biannual updates on its research to the U.S. Senate’s Intelligence Committee, reports The New York Times.

The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force was formed in 2019 for the purpose of studying strange and inexplicable encounters between U.S. military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles or UFOs in a bid “to standardize collection and reporting” of the various sightings.

The program is the successor to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which also investigated UFOs but was dissolved in 2017 due to a lapse of funding. However, the team working on that program continued its work alongside the intelligence community even after it was officially disbanded.

Luis Elizondo, a former military intelligence official who headed the Pentagon program, resigned in October 2017 after a decade with the program. Elizondo, along with a group of former government scientists and officials, remains convinced that objects of unknown origin have crashed on Earth and that these apparently extraterrestrial materials have been the focus of research.

“It no longer has to hide in the shadows,” Elizondo told the Times. “It will have new transparency.”

Former Senate majority leader and retired Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), who led the push to fund the earlier UFO program, also believes that the studies should see the light of day.

“After looking into this, I came to the conclusion that there were reports — some were substantive, some not so substantive — that there were actual materials that the government and the private sector had in their possession,” Reid said.

So far, none of the alleged crash artifacts have been subject to public scrutiny or verification by independent researchers. However, some of the retrieved objects such as strange metallic debris were identified as being manmade – raising the possibility that they could be related to the military of U.S. rivals such as China or Russia.

However, astrophysicist Eric Davis – who served as an advisor for the Pentagon program since 2007 – said that he had briefed the Pentagon in March about material retrieved from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”

The Department of Defense subcontractor also said that he had concluded that the objects found were of the type “we couldn’t make … ourselves.”

In an interview last month, President Donald Trump told his son Donald Trump Jr. that he had heard some “interesting” things about supposed aliens as well as the secretive Area 51 base near Roswell, New Mexico, that some theorists claim is a UFO crash site.

The U.S. government has been increasingly open in its discussions of UFOs since last September when the U.S. Navy admitted that widely-circulated video footage captured by Navy pilots that purportedly showed UFOs flying through the skies did depict actual “unknown” objects that flew into U.S. airspace.

While officials admitted that they have been baffled by the unknown flying objects, they also admit that past encounters with them have been frequent. They also said that rather than calling them “UFOs,” they prefer the term unidentified aerial phenomena or UAPs.

While it remains yet to be seen what information the once-secret UFO unit plans to layout for lawmakers, acting intelligence committee chairman Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is intent on finding out who or what precisely is behind the apparent UFO activity over U.S. military bases.

“We have things flying over our military bases and places where we are conducting military exercises and we don’t know what it is — and it isn’t ours,” Rubio told CBS Miami in an interview last Friday.

“Frankly, that if it’s something from outside this planet — that might actually be better than the fact that we’ve seen some technological leap on behalf of the Chinese or the Russians or some other adversary that allows them to conduct this sort of activity,” the hawkish senator added.

For Reid, further transparency is needed.

“It is extremely important that information about the discovery of physical materials or retrieved craft come out,” he said.




After Trillions Mysteriously Go “Missing,” DoD Getting Audited for First Time in History

By Matt Agorist | Activist Post

“The Defense Department is starting the first agency-wide financial audit in its history,” the Pentagon’s news service said this week, announcing that they are finally going to follow through with something they promised to do for years.

Beginning in 1996 all federal agencies were mandated by law to conduct regular financial audits. However, the Pentagon has NEVER complied with that federal law. In 20 years, it has never accounted for the trillions of dollars in taxpayer funds it has spent, in part because “fudging” the numbers has become standard operating procedure at the Department of Defense, as revealed in a 2013 Reuters investigation by Scot Paltrow, which detailed the illicit tasks of 15-year employee, “Linda Woodford [who] spent the last 15 years of her career inserting phony numbers in the U.S. Department of Defense’s accounts.”

“Every month until she retired in 2011,” Scot J. Paltrow wrote for Reuters, “she says, the day came when the Navy would start dumping numbers on the Cleveland, Ohio, office of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, the Pentagon’s main accounting agency. Using the data they received, Woodford and her fellow DFAS accountants there set about preparing monthly reports to square the Navy’s books with the U.S. Treasury’s – a balancing-the-checkbook maneuver required of all the military services and other Pentagon agencies.

“And every month, they encountered the same problem. Numbers were missing. Numbers were clearly wrong. Numbers came with no explanation of how the money had been spent or which congressional appropriation it came from. ‘A lot of times there were issues of numbers being inaccurate,’ Woodford says. ‘We didn’t have the detail … for a lot of it.’”

“Over the last 20 years, the Pentagon has broken every promise to Congress about when an audit would be completed,” Rafael DeGennaro, director of Audit the Pentagontold the Guardian earlier this year. “Meanwhile, Congress has more than doubled the Pentagon’s budget.”

In what will likely be an immense and highly politicized dog any pony show, the Pentagon is now claiming this will start immediately.

“It demonstrates our commitment to fiscal responsibility and maximizing the value of every taxpayer dollar that is entrusted to us,” chief Pentagon spokesperson Dana W. White said.

“Beginning in 2018, our audits will occur annually, with reports issued Nov. 15,” the Defense Department’s comptroller, David L. Norquist, said, noting the audits will now be an annual task.

As NPR reports, as for how the audit would work, Jim Garamone of the official DoD News agency reports that the department’s Office of the Inspector General has “hired independent public accounting firms to conduct audits of individual components — the Army, Navy, Air Force, agencies, activities and more — as well as a department-wide consolidated audit to summarize all results and conclusions.”

Exactly what will come of this enormous feat of counting the money spent on spreading the American empire remains a mystery. However, what is not a mystery is the trillions that have “gone missing” as a result of the Pentagon’s refusal to comply with 20 years of audits.

As TFTP reported at the time, a Department of Defense Inspector General’s report, released in 2016, left Americans stunned at the jaw-dropping lack of accountability and oversight. The glaring report revealed the Pentagon couldn’t account for $6.5 trillion dollars worth of Army general fund transactions and data, according to a report by the Fiscal Times.

According to the report by the Fiscal Times:

An increasingly impatient Congress has demanded that the Army achieve “audit readiness” for the first time by Sept. 30, 2017, so that lawmakers can get a better handle on military spending. But Pentagon watchdogs think that may be mission impossible, and for good reason…

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), the behemoth Indianapolis-based agency that provides finance and accounting services for the Pentagon’s civilian and military members, could not provide adequate documentation for $6.5 trillion worth of year-end adjustments to Army general fund transactions and data.

The DFAS has the sole responsibility for paying all DOD military and personnel, retirees and annuitants, along with Pentagon contractors and vendors. The agency is also in charge of electronic government initiatives, including within the Executive Office of the President, the Department of Energy and the Departing of Veterans Affairs.

While there is nothing in the IG’s report specifying that the money has been stolen, the mere fact that the Pentagon can’t account for how it spent the money reveals a potentially far greater problem than simple theft alone. Also, other reports put the toll of missing money upwards of $10 trillion.

The accounting errors and manipulated numbers, though obviously problems in their own right, highlight a far greater problem for the Defense Department than only bad recording keeping and wasteful spending habits. In reality, they are a representation of the poor decision-making, and lack of oversight and accountability that plague our nation’s government as a whole and this audit, however promising on the surface, will likely prove to be more of the same.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project, where this article first appearedFollow @MattAgorist on TwitterSteemit, and now on Facebook.

Read more great articles at Activist Post.