Source: Dr. Peter McCullough | The Video Link is HERE
“There is a history of willful blindness to vaccine safety issues, willful blindness because vaccines fall into what's considered an ideology. It's like a religion, and vaccines are accepted as an article of faith.” ~ Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr Peter McCullough presents peer-reviewed evidence of the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and excessive childhood vaccinations, plus he reveals his #1 prevention strategy. He also presents presents peer-reviewed papers pertaining to long covid, natural immunity, the autism epidemic and the transgender crisis.
IMPORTANT: Be sure to see the full transcript below with links to all of the peer-reviewed articles, plus links to some additional resources that were added by CLN editor Ross Pittman, which are indented. Better yet, click the PDF link above to save a copy of this article.
About Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. Peter A. McCullough is an internationally recognized physician, writer, and public figure who has provided testimony to the US Congress and the European Parliament. He has over 1000 published articles and more than 680 citations in the National Library of Medicine. Dr. McCullough has acted as editor-in-chief and served on the editorial boards of numerous subspeciality journals. Additionally, he has overseen the data safety monitoring boards for 24 randomized clinical trials. Dr. McCullough has also successfully treated thousands of heart patients at his clinic including many with vaccine-induced myocarditis. Finally, he is president of “The McCullough Foundation,” which is fighting for truth, justice, and liberty for all—now and forever. Here are some of the prestigious awards that he recently received:
- Peter A. McCullough, World Renowned Internist and Cardiologist, Sought after Speaker, Published Author, was recently selected as Top Internist and Cardiologist of the Year for 2023
- Peter A. McCullough selected for the Lifetime Achievement Award for 2024 by IAOTP
Program Introduction by Dr. Peter McCullough
Please enjoy this one hour long-format program with slides on the current state of the COVID-19 vaccine debacle, failed pandemic response, excessive childhood vaccination, autism epidemic, and transgender crisis.
I want each and every one of you to understand that all of these issues appear to be related. A dangerous ideology has beset our government leaders, public health agencies, and healthcare workers. This groupthink has been driven out of personal fear, and perpetuated with propaganda. It has been simultaneous and been especially intense among Westernized countries all over the world.
How did it happen? What are the dangers now? How can we mitigate additional harms? What can we expect in the future? All of this and more in my lecture for the Michigan Health Choice Alliance Annual Program, Southfield, Michigan April 4, 2024
Program Outline
- A Short Video
- New Biological Products
- COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Review
- What Do the Vaccines Actually Do?
- Early Treatment Is Key
- McCullough’s # 1 Prevention Strategy
- Long COVID
- Natural Immunity
- Twin Epidemics of Autism and Gender Dysphoria
- Conclusions
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Peter McCullough: Thank you we're going to we're going to start off with the video. Leave that up. Thank you so much.
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT
NEWS: A deadly virus emanating out of Wuhan, China is sweeping across the globe.
John Leake: Something is off. (John is the co-author with Dr. Peter McCullough of“The Courage to Face COVID-19”)
NEWS: The disease caused by the novel coronavirus has been titled COVID-19.
John Leake: What we're being told doesn't add up.
Anthony Fauci: It’s so important in this crises we are in that…
NEWS: There’s no cure, no way to treat this illness. All we can do is wait for a vaccine; all we can do is wait for a vaccine.
John Leake: There must be a doctor out there who's questioning this.
Dr. Peter McCullough: I'm Dr. Peter McCullough. I'm the vice chairman of internal medicine. The only chance to reduce the risks of hospitalization is early home treatment. We can beat this pandemic. Patients actually think the virus is untreatable. There's such a focus on the vaccine. Where's the focus on people sick right now? The pressure to suppress any hope of treatment is extraordinary.
Tucker Carlson: Why the single-minded focus on the vaccine? What is that? What is that about?
Dr. Peter McCullough: That's really going to be the goal of investigative reporters to figure this out.
John Leake: Unprecedented lockdowns, devastating economic damage, huge violations of personal freedom, families separated from their loved ones, all in the name of a medical emergency.
Bill Gates: Things won’t go back to truly normal until we have a vaccine that we've gotten out to the entire world
NEWS: What we have for protcting our communities is to get a needle in every arm.
Dr. Peter McCullough: I am not going to follow what you are suggesting and let the virus slaughter my patients… John, I’m watching what's happening, this is a treatable illness.
John Leake: I don't think this is a matter of academic debate and confusion. What the evidence shows is that this is an organized criminal enterprise. They call this a business opportunity.
Dr. Peter McCullough: People need to know the truth.
John Leake: We are witnessing the greatest organized crime in history to the tune of trillions of dollars.
Dr. Peter McCullough: The biopharmaceutical complex is using censorship, propaganda, and manipulation to keep people living in fear. But what we need now is courage.
*** END OF VIDEO ***
NOTE: The above video provides just a tiny glimpse into the events that unfolded during the pandemic. The eye-opening, 4-part documentary “COVID Unmasked” explores the profound depths of the madness, inhumanity, and heartlessness that marked our collective journey through the COVID-19 pandemic.
TRANSCRIPT of Dr. Peter McCullough’s Presentation
I bet everybody can resonate somewhat with that video, that you remember this, that (if we can have the slides up) that you remember parts of this right?
You remember loved ones in the hospital or being told all we can do is wait for a vaccine, being told there's nothing that can be done except wait for the government to tell us what to do in the setting of an emergency. The most interesting thing about this crisis is how simultaneous it was and how worldwide it was. Everything in that video occurred in every single country in the world at the same time. It was truly extraordinary.
As introduced, I'm Dr. Peter McCullough, a practicing internist and cardiologist, board certified in medicine and cardiology. I trained in epidemiology at the University of Michigan. I lived, you know, for a great period of my professional life here in Michigan. My kids graduated from the Northville public school system. My daughter went to Michigan State and then later on started her legal career. My son's a resident now at Pittsburgh and his wife as well is at University of Pittsburgh. And we've all been involved in this great controversy.
So, I have about 250 slides for your resource if you want them. I’m going to show about 50 with an outline. But I'm going to make some comments regarding the bullets of what I feel is a great controversy that we are in right now. All of us now have become virologists. Even the average person on the street knows what a nucleocapsid is, knows what a spike protein is.
The spike protein is the engineered part of this chimeric virus. lt was engineered collaboratively: organized by doctor Anthony Fauci, the chief scientist was Dr. Ralph Baric at the North Carolina Chapel Hill, the coordinator who coordinated this across the globe was Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, and then the person who actually physically did the work and her team was Dr. Shi Zhengli in Wuhan Institute of Virology. This is now all fully understood, exposed in the COVID House Select Committee investigations led by representative Brad Wenstrup. Chip Roy is on that community as well as Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Recently I testified on Capitol Hill just two days after Fauci was there. Actually the same group who questioned Fauci as a group they questioned me. And one of the interchanges that we had, it became known that Fauci DID concede the creation of this virus was for the purposes of making a vaccine! That's what it was all about. That is what Disease X is all about that Dr. Brownstein showed you.
NOTE: Read HERE about the 2013 Fauci-led meeting (including a video of the meeting) where Ralph Baric proposed engineering a coronavirus deadlier and more transmissible than any found in nature. Also must see: The Real Anthony Fauci – The Movie
New Biological Products
So there is a worldwide scientific agenda to create biological threat after biological threat. The United States has been preparing for this for years. We have the 2005 CARE Act that said there will be biological threats and there will be government counter measures which are vaccines written by HHS in Congress in 2005. OK, so this has been planned for a long time that we would get into this circumstance that we are in now.
NOTE: For much more on the planned outbreak, see: Plandemic Indoctornation
But as citizens and as doctors and healthcare professionals and mothers and fathers, we have to defend the issue of public safety that for new biologic products, we have to demand safety, safety, safety. See:
For New Biologic Products, Demand Safety, Safety, Safety by Dr. Peter McCullough
I was having some conversations with some of our representatives and senators here in Michigan, and I was informed that the majority of people in the crowd are conservative and they are on the side of freedom of vaccine choice freedom, medical freedom, but I said, yes, freedom is kind of step one of of rectifying this problem that we're in. Step 2 is to recognize, our candidates recognize, that we've got a Consumer Product Safety issue on our hands of massive proportions.
And so as you work with your candidates and your your favorites, make sure that they fundamentally understand that freedom of course is what we all have as our inalienable right and we will never give it up, but we will not allow or tolerate any candidate to sit there and watch a catastrophe unfold on the US public. It's unacceptable for any candidate to be willfully blind to the consumer product safety issue.
They all read this paper:
The Great Gamble of COVID-19 Vaccine Development by Dr. Peter A McCullough, dated August 17, 2020
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Review
By invitation, in the first year of the pandemic, myself and Scott Atlas were writing op eds in The Hill which is read by the White House, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. Scott was focusing on masks and lockdowns. I didn't waste my time there. I was all on early treatment and what was going to happen here. This paper is unambiguous. Look at the title. This vaccine program was a gamble. It was a gamble for all time with humanity, and I meant it.
Dr. Acevedo-Whitehouse in Mexico has done a wonderful job in explaining in the peer reviewed literature what the genetic vaccines are, the messenger RNA vaccines:
Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: a hypothesis
They are the genetic code for the spike protein which was engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The spike protein is the lethal part of the virus. The genetic code is injected in the human body and there's no way to shut it off. There's no off switch. Some people invariably are going to produce too much spike protein for too long in the wrong parts of the body and it's going to be fatal. All of this could have been easily predicted ahead of time.
RELATED VIDEO: Here’s What the mRNA Jab Does To the Body | Dr. Christina Parks, PhD in Cellular and Molecular Biology
It's astounding that you're looking at the only public figure in writing prominently who questioned these vaccines, not a single chief of medicine, not a single chief of infectious disease, not a single person of medical standing in this state or anywhere in the world put in writing questioning this. Why wouldn't we question the notion of injecting the genetic code for the lethal part of the virus?
We followed up with a paper pretty quickly in 2021, outlining an enormous number of concerns. This paper was sent to every single government in the world.
Roxana Bruno gets a great amount of credit for this. We had a litany of questions regarding these vaccines:
- Where are they gonna go?
- How do we ensure safety?
- How are we gonna protect populations who could be harmed by the vaccines?
- Where's the risk stratification in terms of who really would need a vaccine if it indeed worked?
And then what's come out in paper after paper (and believe me what I'm showing you is the tip of the iceberg because there's so much bias against any manuscript questioning the vaccines). But look at this one:
This one is showing you adverse events that are happening in babies who are breastfed by vaccinated mothers. Probably the best example of what we call shedding or this inadvertent vaccination of people who really are not recipients directly of the vaccine.
But what we've learned in paper after paper now is nothing short of astounding. It is really the medical story of our lifetime. This paper from Stanford found the messenger RNA is in lymph nodes at 60 days in women having lymph node sampling:
Castruita, in a cohort of hepatitis C patients, found the messenger RNA circulating in blood 28 days after injection:
SARS-Cov-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences circulate in blood up to 28 after COVID-19 vaccination
People who took these shots simply took them on faith. No one could have known what's going to happen once they get an injection of a brand new technology: messenger RNA loaded on a lipid nanoparticle.
This is the only paper of its type, but it has not been challenged, demonstrating that at least part of the genetic code is reverse transcribed into the human genome:
Now, the center part called the PCR, the amplicon, which is a reporter region that the investigators think is pretty reliable, it’s a human hepatoma cell line, demonstrated that Pfizer, the code for Pfizer, part of it got in the human genome within a matter of six hours. Now, if the entire code is permanently installed in the genome in a mosaic of cells, we could be in trouble because then, even if the vaccine is gone, our own cells could be reproducing this dangerous protein within the human body.
Now, a lot more work needs to be done, but I can tell you a paper after paper is being suppressed. Research project after project is not being approved. We're seeing institutional review boards not not even willing to review protocols on this.
I've personally spoken to doctor Whitehouse who's now going to be doing the research independently; she's getting a ton of vials since now you can actually buy Pfizer and Moderna over the counter.
But what we see paper after paper should not be happening – messenger RNA in breast milk:
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk
Remember, if a drug gets into breast milk, it's a big deal for a lactating woman. Now, the vaccine getting into the placenta, getting in the placenta:
Pregnant women and women of children potential were specifically excluded from the clinical trials. Should never have received an experimental genetic vaccine coding for the lethal part of the virus because there's two patients: the mother and the baby.
Pinellas and colleagues showed pregnant women have better outcomes than non pregnant women with COVID-19. They're the lowest of risk population, yet when the vaccines came out in the first week of the vaccine campaign, over 3000 pregnant women were vaccinated. They were not excluded.
In fact, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in an unprecedented manner, that pregnant women should take the vaccine at anytime during pregnancy. Remember, the first trimester is organogenesis; that's when the baby's forming the middle part and the late part. That was unprecedented to show absolutely no concern for the mother or the baby.
Now, just breaking this week, the results of the first randomized trial of pregnant women taking the vaccine shows a four to one increased rate of birth defects in the babies – in Pfizer's own study, which they cut short.
The news that DNA fragments or process-related impurities, in two papers, are found in the vaccine:
DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.
and
Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose
SV40 (Simian virus 40), which is a known, you know, proto-oncogene activator, the promoter enhancer, the origin of insertion, antibiotic resistant genes. This was part of the processing of loading the genetic code for Pfizer & Moderna on a DNA plasmid and have E. coli crank up their production and manufacturing of so-called process two in the production of the vaccine. But there should be measures to keep these contaminants down.
In my research, it has led me, unfortunately, to conclusions like issues of vaccines being contaminated to be an old issue.
The smallpox vaccine was grossly contaminated in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Think about it, we had no way of purifying it; it was coming literally from the juices of cows or horses or human-to-human and arm-to-arm transmission, arm-to-arm vaccination. It had to be grossly contaminated with staph and strep and tetanus and syphilis and foot-and-mouth disease. People died of the smallpox vaccine in large numbers.
What was the government response? Mandatory vaccination, taking kids out of school, putting people in jail, corporal assault and vaccination with smallpox. That's what happened in our country, in the UK, and in Europe. That's 120 years ago, as if we've learned nothing, and the smallpox vaccine failed miserably, didn't stop smallpox. And just like Dr. Bronstein mentioned, smallpox basically faded out of existence, not because of the vaccine, but because we had improved hygienic measures.
Another example of contaminated vaccines, and there’s an Institute of Medicine report on this, and that's the polio vaccine contaminated with, guess what, SV 40:
Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer (2003)
Between 1954 and 1963, 98 million Americans received the polio vaccine. That's me, and it was contaminated with a carcinogenic monkey virus, SV40. The Institute of Medicine has reviewed this. So, we can't know how much cancer today is really due to the fact that children like myself were vaccinated against smallpox using this faulty vaccine. Sorry, vaccinated against polio using this faulty vaccine.
There is a history of willful blindness to vaccine safety issues, willful blindness because vaccines fall into what's considered an ideology. It's like a religion, and vaccines are accepted as an article of faith.
So my colleagues, and a few have had the courage to reach back and communicate with me over the last four years, one of them from Johns Hopkins said, “Well, don't you believe in vaccines anymore?” In medicine, we don't believe in things or not. We actually evaluate them. We have a scientific evaluation, a clinical understanding, and we're constantly reviewing the literature. Well, I can tell you, the safety review on these vaccines is an absolute catastrophe.
And any candidate running for office is willfully blind to what's going on if they are not openly campaigning on this. This is a tragedy. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System went through the roof when the vaccines came out. The CDC has fully vetted and accepted 18,655 Americans who have died with the vaccine, reported by doctors like me who believe the vaccine is a cause of death. 1150 have died on the same day they took the shot, 1150! 1225 died the day after the shot:
The CDC has the patient's name, e-mail, phone number, family member's number, the clinical vignette. Hundreds of papers have been written and analyzed from these, including the vignettes. I've read them. The vaccine looks like it's the direct cause of death. VAERS can be used to ascertain cause of death. We simply read the clinical vignettes and we adjudicate this. The most number of deaths that has ever been recorded in this system for the last 30 years (through 2020): 150 in a year. 18,655 deaths (through February 2024).
In the FDA deliberations with the open comments, there is an underreporting factor, meaning if we don't have a vaccine card and someone doesn't take the initiative and have all the information and report it, and the CDC confirmed the death certificate and everything else, it doesn't get in the system. A reasonable underreporting factor is 30. 30 times 18,655 is 550,000 Americans who have died after the vaccine. And we have candidates running for office who do not acknowledge this catastrophe. This is worse than the Civil War. This isn't vaccine choice; this is a biological safety catastrophe.
NOTE: According to a study by Dr. Denis Rancourt and colleagues, there has been an estimated “17 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, from 13.50 billion injections up to 2 September 2023.” That’s right: 17 million vaccine deaths globally. See here: COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere
In Texas, the vaccines are so dangerous that we had to ban any mandate because we couldn't mandate someone to take a lethal vaccine. That's the reason why vaccines are being banned: is because they're lethal in so many people.
Nick Foster, who's here in the audience tonight from the University of Michigan, has led the most important sets of studies. He's shown that, broadly in death, 73.9% of all the deaths that occur after a vaccine, and come to autopsy, are directly due to the vaccine. The next person who dies with no antecedent illness, with no apparent reason to die, and they've taken the vaccine at any time, it is the vaccine until proven otherwise. That's a conservative safety approach – until proven otherwise.
A few years ago, we'd hear about correspondents and other people dying right after they took the vaccine. Now, the vaccine is being expunged from any press reports. Now, they simply die of unknown or quote “natural causes” with no anticipated illness. What you're being told and what you're witnessing is a safety cover-up.
RELATED VIDEO: Died Suddenly – Full Documentary
Now, fortunately, a large number of people look like they're fine. 30% of people in this study have no side effects whatsoever, not even a sore arm. Nothing appears to happen. See:
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19
Just under 2/3 take a vaccine, and have some minor side effects. We're talking 4.2% of people who take a shot get in trouble. It's called “hot lots.” The explanations are maybe some of the vials have too much messenger RNA in it, maybe these contamination, contamination entities, these impurities play a role. There have been visible contaminants in the vaccines. The vaccines have never been inspected for how much messenger RNA is in the vaccine.
RELATED ARTICLE: Super Toxic Batches Found in Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen Vaccines by Data Analysis of CDC VAERS | Find Out How Toxic Your Batch Is
Of the 75% of Americans who took a shot, 94% of them took a messenger RNA vaccine. Fortunately, we have 25% of Americans, according to the COVID stats program, who are free of taking a vaccine. They didn't take one. Thank goodness. Thank goodness we have enough people who don't need to worry about this.
In the Danish study, it was 4.2% of people who were in trouble. In the CDC v-safe data, of which the CDC refused to release to the public until they were forced under court order, it’s 7.7% of Americans are in trouble who've taken the vaccines. I mean, deep trouble. And the news has been bad all the way through: cardiovascular, neurologic, hematologic, and immunologic problems everywhere after the vaccine.
My clinic and Dr. Brownstein’s clinic is like a war zone of blood clots, heart damage, amputations, heart failure, people who are absolutely miserable now for years, years with deep regret. And every single one of you said, you know, “I won't go to the doctor who told me to get the vaccine. I don't see that doctor anymore.” So there are doctors who actually are not seeing any of the vaccine complications because the patients, that 5 to 10% of patients who are really damaged, never go back to them.
The 5th area of concern is cancer. Now, this paper from Angues and Bustos at the University of Oregon indicates that there are multiple mechanisms by which the vaccines could cause cancer:
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis
When I testified on the Hill recently, I mentioned the FDA says for gene transfer technology products, which are what messenger RNA vaccines are and what formerly the adenoviral vaccines were, the FDA says we have five years minimum, probably up to 15 years of concern, observation, worry. Family members took these vaccines. How long are you gonna worry about them? 5 to 15 years after the last shot? That's what the FDA says.
People always ask me, “When is it over with?” Not for a long time because we don't know. The genetic code is long lasting. The spike protein in the body is even more long lasting. 3,400 papers in the peer-reviewed literature with a heavy bias to accept none of them. There probably are hundreds of thousands of manuscripts out there regarding serious safety syndromes that cannot get into the peers, but what's getting in is very disturbing. This paper from Harvard showing the messenger RNA is in the heart muscle:
It's physically in the heart muscle. And that white around it is inflammation and damage and edema of cells. Messenger RNA is physically in the heart 30 days later when people die. That means all messenger RNA vaccines will probably physically be in the heart, causing heart damage. There's no reason for us to think that's not the case. That means that Moderna's influenza vaccine and Moderna's respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, and they've already altered their trials to the Epstein-Barr virus vaccine, will likely cause myocarditis. Get used to saying myocarditis. We'll see a lot of it if messenger RNA technology is advanced like we're hearing it’s going to be advanced around the world. It is directly cardiotoxic.
Baumeier and colleagues staining for the spike protein, which all pathologists should do in all autopsies and biopsies (which they're not currently doing now), as you can see, the heart muscle stains positive for the spike protein:
Intramyocardial Inflamation after COVID-19 Vaccination: An Endomyocardial Biopsy-Proven Case Series
So messenger RNA, which codes and produces the spike protein, is physically in the heart, causing inflammation.
The messenger RNA is directly toxic to cardiomyocytes:
It causes dysfunction and causes abnormalities and depolarization and repolarization. This is a standard preclinical cardiotoxicity evaluation. If this would have been done ahead of time in any type of product, it would have not moved forward. It's toxic to human heart cells. Yet, the vaccines were rolled out.
This study done, the University of Texas at Houston played a prominent role, showed that the vaccinated have markedly abnormal cardiac PET scans (positron emission tomography) compared to the unvaccinated.
They were getting PETs for other reasons, but you can see here on the right is a vaccinated patient where the heart is lighting up red for fluorodeoxyglucose. The human heart should take up free fatty acids as its normal fuel, but when the heart muscle gets diseased and ischemic, it preferentially takes up glucose. Also, cancers do that. Maybe it's micro aggregation of red blood cells. Maybe the spike protein is sufficiently toxic to the cardiomyocytes they get sick and they prefer fluorodeoxyglucose.
But this was virtually everybody in the study. I'm telling you, everybody who took a vaccine, whether they look healthy to you or not, I'm concerned about this cardiac finding because we are seeing cardiac arrests where we don't have classic myocarditis present. But we know from this very important study the cardiac PET scans are abnormal – they're abnormal at least six months out. We don't know how long they're abnormal. We don't know the implications of this.
We do know those who had a sore arm had more intense cardiac findings. This paper from Harvard, published in Circulation, our best cardiac research journal, showed that young boys hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital had myocarditis:
Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis
They had circulating spike protein, but the antibodies were not neutralizing the spike protein. It's now been shown that if we keep giving the vaccine over and over again, the body shifts to relatively useless forms of antibodies, so-called IgG subclass 4. They don't bind the spike protein. Now, the boys who are fine with no myocarditis, they had spike protein, but the antibodies were appropriately blocking the spike protein. We have no way of predicting who the next person is who takes a shot, who's going to have unopposed spike protein circulate in their body and cause heart damage.
This paper I worked with Jessica Rose shows, of the available studies right now, there is a measurable mortality rate with myocarditis, even within a few months, and it can range from one, two, three percent, four percent:
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis
Myocarditis is not transient. It's not self-limited, and it's not benign. It's not. We have no idea how large this problem is. What I'm showing you is the tip of the iceberg.
These cases are striking:
Choi and colleagues. 22-year-old man, five days after the first shot of Pfizer, goes to a Korean hospital. He dies 7 hours later in the hospital. Full CPR, full ICU, full everything. His heart biopsy necropsy at the time of autopsy is essentially rotted out with inflammation from the vaccine. Fatal Pfizer myocarditis. Cannot be saved.
These two boys in Connecticut, aged 16 and 17, three and four days after Pfizer, are dead in bed:
Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose: Cytokine Storm, Hypersensitivity, or Something Else (Archives of Pathology)
Teenage boys, dead in bed. No chance for CPR, no chance to be saved. Autopsy performed. University of Michigan, University of Connecticut called in to help the coroner. Conclusion: fatal Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis.
Every candidate running for office should be talking about these two boys. Parents should be outraged. Parents should be pressing candidates to the wall on this. Why are our young children dying of the vaccine, proven in autopsy, confirmed studies? The willful blindness of our candidates is shameful, honestly. This should be an outrage. If people are outraged about a single life being lost due to a murder from a migrant, why aren't they worried about two boys who died after taking the vaccine, where it's so clear-cut? Archives of Pathology.
Well, here's a young person who got the message – Fabienne Schlumpf:
Swiss Olympic athlete Fabienne Schlumpf diagnosed with myocarditis
She took three vaccines, got myocarditis. She says, “I'm not running.” Because it was known before COVID, if there's myocarditis, what triggers the cardiac arrest is a surge of adrenaline with sports or typically during the waking hours from sleep, like those two boys. She knew it was dangerous to run, and she wasn't going to do it. She was honest.
He knew as well – Oscar Cabrera Adames:
He didn't want to take the shots. He tweeted out, “I don't take the shots.” He was forced to take them. He's from the Dominican Republic, and he plays in the European leagues. He has a cardiac arrest on the floor, and he's revived, and he tweets out, “I had this cardiac arrest because of these shots.” So it's crystal clear what happened. Two years later, he's trying to come back. He gets on a medical-grade stress test, and he dies on the treadmill two years later, after myocarditis.
I'm telling you, it's not over after a few days after these shots. We are seeing cardiac arrest now occurring years after taking these vaccines.
RELATED ARTICLE: Athletes Are DYING from the COVID-19 Shots! | Dr. Peter McCullough Explains Why (shows more than 1,000 athletes dying)
Nick Hulsher is here, University of Michigan. This is his paper. It outlines the mechanism of what's going on here:
Autopsy finding in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis
The shots are taken into the body. There probably are risk factors. About half the time, there are symptoms maybe we can intercept. The other half the time, there are no symptoms. The cardiac MRI lights up like a Christmas tree in severe cases, typically the inferior lateral wall, and it's typically the outer part of the myocardium adjacent to the pericardium. We have blood tests and things we can do. Dr. Brownstein talked about using advanced EKG as a technique. The MRI is not foolproof. The MRI can only take slices at certain distances, and we're seeing the MRI does not completely diagnose all the cases. But when a surge of adrenaline occurs, then the fatal arrhythmia kicks off.
This paper has received more downloads and reads than any paper in this journal now for years. It's the number one paper on the entire preprint server system. Now we're responding to letters to the editor – people are trying to take shots at this. We've just simply described a couple dozen people who died after the vaccine, and the autopsies are conclusive. They have fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis. So, without protection from the laws or the the pharmaceutical laws being carried out and enforced, we're in trouble.
Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of the vaccine. Pfizer refused to release the data. They were forced to by court order. The FDA protected Pfizer and tried to keep this data from you for 55 years. The FDA did.
NOTE: You can view and/or download Pfizer’s report on adverse events HERE (see Table 1, Case Outcome: Fatal: 1223).
RELATED ARTICLE: How Pfizer Hid Nearly 80% of COVID Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators
Two Presidents Knew About Vaccine-Induced Deaths and Allowed It To Continue
Now remember, our FDA reports to HHS, and the HHS is on the cabinet. So we've had two presidents, two presidents now, who have allowed this to happen and they're both up for election again. Think about this.
Talk about government, you saw the videos of election integrity, and it looked like it was one-sided. Listen, there are both parties involved here. There's plenty of blame to go around. There's plenty of Democrat on this, and there's plenty of Republican on this. The FDA is covering up safety data on a vaccine that was essentially forced on Americans. It's not safe anywhere.
The World Council for Health, which is a worldwide body, said, “Pull them off the market” in 2022:
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, myself, many of the doctors here belong to that group, in 2023 said, “Pull them off the market.” Tons of data suggest they're not safe for human use. I've been in the U.S. Senate. I made the call in 2022. European Parliament, and the U.S. House of Representatives, they're not safe for human use. Let's call it.
You know there's not a single chief of medicine in the country has come out and expressed their concern about the vaccine. Not a single chief of infectious disease, not a single dean.
We have about 200 state and federal officials right now who are to the point where they are saying these aren't safe. Brad Paquette, Michigan representative, is one of them. If you want to somebody on the internet, follow, Mary Talley Bowden down in Houston, she is keeping track of this. She's doing a great job.
People in Washington know this stuff. Don't think that, “Oh, my favorite candidate doesn't know what's going on.” They all know what's going on. So, what are the choices? They don't care, or they're in on it. Which one? It's not good, is it – for any of them, any of them who are not making this a major issue.
Think about the candidates too. We have very tight races in our country, usually, you know, 50/50. If anybody wants to win some votes, that would be a pretty easy way to win some votes:
“Hey listen, I think we've got a safety problem on our hands. If I get in office, I'm going to call in some experts, and I'm gonna figure out what's going on. I'm gonna make things right.”
A gushing sound of votes would go to that candidate who cares about half a million Americans who have lost their lives, and millions of Americans now who are injured.
What Do the Vaccines Actually Do?
So, what do the vaccines actually do, what did they do? There were multiple false claims:
- They never prevented infection with the current strains.
- They don’t stop transmission.
- They don't reduce hospitalization and death. Not a single randomized trial showed they reduce hospitalization and death.
They were false claims. We still, four years later, we still have cases of COVID.
Failure of Smallpox Vaccination
I mentioned we've had failed vaccines before. The smallpox vaccine was probably the greatest example of a failed vaccine. These are peer-reviewed papers demonstrating hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of cases of smallpox of people who are vaccinated against smallpox. It's obvious the vaccine didn't work. It simply did not work. This was 100 years ago, and yet it became mandated. It became part of vaccine ideology. Why? Why does this happen?
Vaccine Efficacy Overestimated
Fung and colleagues have published on this:
Sources of bias in observational studies of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness
Vaccine Efficacy Overestimated In Non-Randomized Studies
1) The virus mutated. It got milder over time. Milder mutations as more vaccinated over time
2) Hospital EMR's declared everybody “unvaccinated” by default
3) Differential testing: the vaccinated were not getting tested, while the unvaccinated were.
3) There was no linkage to CDC vaccine data. To this day, the CDC doesn't allow any linking, so we can't do any research with a vaccinated data set.
4) No control over early treatment or natural immunity, things that really do work. 5) No adjudication for hospital COVID illness. It was just always “test positive,” and people can test positive for many months after the original infection.
6) And huge conflicts of interest (COI): fully vaccinated doctors at institutions who mandated the vaccines. I can tell you, I do this for a living. They would not be allowed to publish a paper showing the vaccines didn't work. That would never get approved by the research department or the department chair.
Academic Fraud
This is a wide-open set of examples and reasons why there's academic fraud, and I've used that term in the US Senate on November 19th, 2020. And Brad Wenstrup, the House Select Committee, is going to call up journal editors and publishers next for the committee, and they're going to discuss academic fraud.
Miscategorization Bias
Norman Fenton and the group at Queens in the UK has had a wonderful paper on this recently about miscategorization bias:
The extent and impact of vaccine status miscategorisation on covid-19 vaccine efficacy studies
Do you know when it was a quote “crisis of the unvaccinated”? They simply declared people in the hospital unvaccinated, and it was a fraudulent claim of misclassification. No one was checking to see if grandmother or grandfather had a vaccine card when they're in the ICU in isolation. They were assumed to be unvaccinated.
Consent Form
What do the vaccines actually do? The consent form shows the only benefit they claim is the vaccines “have been shown” (past tense) to prevent COVID-19. Even the consent form says it doesn't reduce severity, it doesn't reduce hospitalization and death, and it doesn't reduce transmission. If the consent form doesn't say this, why would our FDA and CDC promote the vaccine like this? Why would Pfizer and Moderna promote the vaccine like this? We never promote things beyond the claims made on a consent form. It's fraudulent promotion.
The Omicron variant blew through natural immunity, is blowing through the vaccine immunity:
The newer versions of the vaccines are so outdated by the time they come up. It's obvious now, in any study that has fair access to vaccinated status, the vaccines are failing grossly, just like the smallpox vaccine did.
More Shots Mean More COVID
Look at this: 75% of people in the UK hospitalized with COVID were vaccinated (and 79.5% of the deaths were vaccinated):
In the Cleveland Clinic data, the best is to be unvaccinated. The naturally unvaccinated have the lowest risk, and those who keep taking the shots are getting sicker and sicker and sicker. More shots actually mean more COVID. It makes it worse.
Vaccines Were Pre-Purchased
So, this has been a financial bonanza for these companies. John Leake was right when he said it's a crime:
Vaccine Manufacturers Railroad Products through the FDA while Raking in Pre-Purchase Revenue by Dr. Peter Mccullough
You know, a blockbuster drug used to take 20 years of development. The companies, big pharma, did pour a lot of money into this. They could pour in half a billion to a billion dollars. If they earned a billion dollars in the first year of a blockbuster drug, that was Pfizer's blockbuster drug with Lipitor. Do you know that Pfizer and Moderna have made tens of billions of dollars without the development or sales and marketing costs? Pre-purchased. These were pre-purchased. Nobody knew if they were going to work.
Early Treatment Is Key
As Dr. Brownstein pointed out, whether they're vaccinated or not, some need early treatment. These are the two seminal papers that I brought over the finish line in 2020:
Vaccinated or Not, Acute COVID-19 in High- Risk Patients Demands Early Treatment by Dr. Peter McCullough
and
Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection by Dr. Peter McCullough
I said, “Listen, we do not have large randomized trials to hand us the answer: we need to use clinical judgment. Let's find drugs that have acceptable safety and signals of benefit, use them in combination, make careful observations, and let's figure out what works. We'll take care of patients and study this at the same time.” That's what Dr. Brownstein did. That’s what I did. We published the best we could.
We understood that the infection had a viral replication phase, an inflammation phase, and then in the end, thrombosis or blood clotting. Let me tell you, the blue and the red are far more important than the yellow, and there are plenty of places in the world where they never even treated the virus, and they didn't need to because they treat the inflammation and treat the blood clotting, and they got through it.
Dr. Chetty in South Africa did that. Dr. Eugenia Barrientos in El Salvador did this. Recently, Sean Downing (who was on my show), Sean did this in Sarasota, FL. Didn't even treat the virus, don't need hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin – he just treated the inflammation and the blood clotting, and people got through the illness.
Dr. McCullough’s # 1 Prevention Strategy
I've been impressed, as Dr. Brownstein said, with the nasal washes and gargles.
Effect of 1% Povidone Iodine Mouthwash/Gargle, Nasal and Eye Drop in COVID-19 patient
Something I didn't know about: the quality of these clinical trials and the results are astounding. This is just 1% povidone iodine, a couple of drops of iodine in some saline. Look at everyone's PCR positive. They're sick with COVID. By day three, the positivity rate has plummeted in blue:
Masks didn't stop the infection. Vaccines didn't stop the infection. Social distancing, lockdowns (didn’t stop the infection). This was the answer. This was the answer. If we just would have used nasal sprays and gargles, we would have dramatically shut down transmission. I think everybody would have gotten the illness eventually, but we would have markedly reduced people getting very sick, and this was something we could use up front. We could use additional drugs or therapies later on.
Safe, Effective Antimicrobial Nasal/Oral Rinses
20 studies, 17 randomized trials, 53% lower risk. When Representative Nancy Mace found out about this, she went nuts. She goes, why isn't our federal government trying to message this to people:
GOP Congresswoman Wants to Know Why Feds Have Not Promoted Nasal Spray to Treat COVID-19
Simple nasal sprays and gargles. Povidone-iodine, colloidal silver, hydrogen peroxide dilute, xylitol. In our book, and many of you have a copy of the book, we have a chapter in there. You know, the Federal Trade Commission tied up every single company making a nasal spray or gargle and sued them and did not let them progress in their research or any of their, you know, advancements to try to help this.
Every single product we tried – hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, colchicine, prednisone, monoclonal antibodies, aspirin, nasal sprays and gargles – everything that could help patients was impeded by the federal government. When I told Tucker Carlson this, that’s he went nuts, because we're not talking about one thing. We're not just talking about hydroxychloroquine, we’re talking about monoclonal antibodies, expensive high-tech. They worked. Why did they yank each one from off the market within a matter of weeks to months?
I think it was a vaccine-only strategy worldwide from the beginning. I think John Leake was right. CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, said, “Listen, there will be a series of pandemics, and this is a business opportunity for one thing: mass vaccination over and over again.” So we've already seen this, right?
So we've seen COVID and COVID vaccines, but don't forget, we've also had a worldwide and national declared monkeypox crisis and monkeypox vaccines. We are in the midst of a respiratory syncytial virus bonanza, where every person my age is supposed to get an RSV vaccine, all pregnant women are supposed to get RSV vaccines in the third trimester, all my babies should be getting monoclonal antibodies against RSV, and it's being done. It's being done.
Disease X, Dr. Bronstein showed you. Something has happened. Something in the human medical mind has clicked in a very distorted, unnatural, reckless way. Everything I mentioned, there's no attention to safety now. None.
Look at the data, though. This is my #1 prevention strategy:
This isn't a vaccine. This isn't a drug. This is a xylitol nasal spray. Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 71% efficacy of xylitol, a simple nasal spray. You could buy it at any pharmacy here in southeast Michigan.
Why wouldn't we message this to everybody? This is the most important thing I've learned. When you're around people like tonight, when you go home, use your nasal spray as a bit of prevention, whether it's COVID, influenza, the common cold. Protect yourself.
Why did we use hydroxychloroquine, aspirin, ivermectin, prednisone, colchicine, cyproheptadine? Because we're supposed to. The FDA says right on their website, when we're faced with an unmet need, we should be using drugs off their original advertising label. That's what we do in medicine. The FDA fully supports the use of what we do.
The FDA Was Wrong About Ivermectin
Recently, you probably heard that under a court action settlement, the FDA now is taking down all of their deceptive statements on ivermectin.
Ivermectin has been in the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons' home treatment since August of 2020. Those aligned with Frontline Critical Care Consortium, they've been working with ivermectin in the same time frame. We've used it now for four years, safer than Tylenol, and in my experience, I think it is one of the most effective drugs we have.
We knew by December of 2020, there was clear and convincing evidence that early treatment was dramatically reducing the risk of hospitalization and death. To this day, we could have saved about 2/3 of those lives that were lost. We could have spared all those hospitalizations, but yet we were impeded by every government agency out there, and this happened all over the world, all at once.
Long COVID
Now we're faced with this issue of long COVID for patients who had the vaccine. There are millions and millions of Americans who don’t feel well. They have fatigue, neuropsychiatric, cardiovascular, respiratory symptoms. What we know, in this paper from Germany, is that about 70% of long COVID is really due to the vaccine because people have been loaded with the spike protein in the vaccine:
Association between virus variants, vaccinations, previous infections, and post-COVID-19 risk
So when you read a manuscript about long COVID, look at if it's 2020, it could be long COVID. If it's 2021 and beyond, it's likely the vaccine. Peter Parry from Australia, I think, has appropriately positioned this as a spikeopathy:
‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA
Circulating Pfizer and Moderna Spike Protein
It's due to the spike protein in the human body, the spike protein, the spine on the surface of the virus. Many medical centers see patients right now, they make no assessment for the spike protein. I bet University of Michigan (U of M) doesn't do it. I know Mayo Clinic doesn't. People go to Mayo Clinic for long COVID, don't even measure anything related to the spike protein. In fact, Texas Medical Center in Houston, they give a vaccine. They actually give the vaccine for long COVID and make people much worse. That's how perverted this is.
Brogna and colleagues found that about half of the subjects who take a vaccine have the circulating Pfizer or Moderna spike protein, and one can actually determine this from a molecular perspective in the bloodstream for six months:
No wonder people feel bad after the vaccine. They have the protein that was engineered in the Chinese biosecurity lab in their bloodstream circulating. This is the worst idea. This was what I was envisioning when I wrote my paper in August of 2020. No one has a clue of what's going to happen when we install the genetic code.
Base Spike Protein Detoxification
So we're working like crazy to come up with approaches to try to rid the body of the spike protein. One is what we call base spike protein detoxification:
Clinical Approach to Post-acute Sequelae After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination
That is, the spike protein comes from the infection and from the vaccine. We know that the biology is complicated here. The spike protein is in plasma, attached to red blood cells. It's within cells. And what we've proposed is three natural substances: nattokinase, starting dose 2000 units twice a day; bromelain, 500 milligrams a day; and curcumin, 500 milligrams twice a day.
Now, nattokinase and bromelain, they do dissolve the spike protein in preclinical models. We don’t know what happens in the human body, but they do in preclinical models. Curcumin, in human randomized trials, definitely reduces spike protein inflammation. That's been shown. So this is a proposal.
NOTE: Dr. McCullough calls the above protocol the McCullough Protocol BASE Spike Detoxification. The word “base” is important because it signifies that in addition to triple therapy with nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin, other drugs and interventions can be added to reduce the intensity and duration of symptoms while the root cause of the syndrome (Spike protein) is being cleared from the body. Nicotine patches is one addition Dr. McCullough believes are promising, based on limited testing. MUST SEE: Rationale for Nicotine Patch in Treatment of Long-COVID and Vaccine Injuries | Dr. Peter McCullough
But the Biden administration spent a billion dollars on this. No proposals, no new drugs, no protocols, nothing. Nothing. A billion dollars down the drain. And academic medical centers took all this money and honestly, they blew it. I checked clinicaltrials.gov. Not a single large randomized trial testing as yet.
So what have we done? We've made careful observations in our clinic. We have thousands of people doing this. We've advanced the doses. We add other drugs depending on what the syndrome is. We've held teleconferences and calls. I've talked to doctors across the UK who are doing this. It works. We believe it helps people get better from long COVID and vaccine injury syndromes. But it's slow – it could take 3, 6, 9, 12 months.
People have been sick now for a couple years. They're not going to get better in a couple days. And this is a base. Some people say, “I want to add N-Acetylcysteine” (NAC). I say, go for it, add it. Add it to the base program. I want to add what I think is another natural product. I say go for it. Listen, this is a complicated world. This is a base, a base trio that we think we're low on the doses, but we have to do something to help people, and we're going for it.
Natural Immunity
Natural immunity. The best paper to quote is by Chin and colleagues, US prison system – 59,000 prisoners, 16,000 staff:
Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System
What you need to know is, if someone had an infection with Delta or Omicron, and they get another infection in COVID, zero risk of hospitalization and death. Zero. These are people who are motivated to get out of prison and be hospitalized. So when someone tells you, “I got COVID,” your first question is, “Did you have it before? Is this your first case?” If you had it before, they're at the lowest risk.
So the new risk stratification paradigm is that previous well-documented COVID is the lowest risk. The vaccine is irrelevant. The vaccine doesn't reduce anyone's risk of getting COVID or changing natural history, but prior infection does. Natural immunity protects. It makes the syndrome milder every time.
Twin Epidemics of Autism and Gender Dysphoria
Last few minutes, I want to change topics about this twin epidemic of autism and gender dysphoria that we're seeing. Many are here because you've been touched by autism. Let's see a show of hands. How many of you been touched by autism in your family, circles, or people you know? Yeah, I'm in that group too. It's probably about 1/3 of you. Look at the top left-hand. Look at the doses of vaccines starting from when I was a kid in the 60s: 3 vaccines. Now, to over 108 shots. 108 shots. Excessive vaccination, excessive.
Then look at the complexity of autism and look at autism skyrocketing. So when I was a child, one in 10,000. Now it's one in 36 and rising. States that have mandatory vaccination for all kids in school with no exceptions, like California, they have autism tracks. There's science and math and arts and technology and autism is a track in school now. That's how common autism is.
And then look at the right-hand corner. Gender dysphoria, gender dysphoria and transgenderism. Those of you who have autistic children will attest that it's extremely difficult. It's a spectrum. I have a very elderly man with terminal heart failure, but he's autistic. He's like Rain Man. He's actually never been with a woman his whole life. He wasn't the high school quarterback. He didn't get married. I bet he had a lot of gender dysphoria over the course of his life.
Well, what do we know? In terms of autism, immune dysregulation appears to be a bedrock of pathophysiology early on. This exhaustive review, 236 references, 200 papers:
Immune Dysregulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know About It?
The immune system and cytokines appear to be related to autism. The single greatest perturbation in human immunity during the formative years of life, where autism occurs in the first few years of life, is vaccination. Vaccination.
The relationship between the intensity of vaccine schedule and autism can't be ignored. The big papers, like this one by DeLong, showed that once we got to combination products, that's when autism started to skyrocket:
So once these vaccine products got put into combination, do you know, I think at 18 months now, some of the mothers will know, a child actually gets exposed to greater than 12 different vaccines at once. In the vignettes, when a child has a febrile seizure after a battery of vaccines, there's a paper published in Europe, once that febrile seizure occurs, there's a 40% chance that child will develop autism. Febrile seizures after vaccines are a disaster. They are not mild, and they're not inconsequential.
RELATED ARTICLE: Kids, Vaccines and Autism: Will a New Legal Strategy End the Decades-long Battle for Truth and Justice?
The Straw that Broke the Camel's Back
So when the ACIP panel recommended COVID vaccines be added to the panel down to age 6 months, that's when I think the straw broke the camel's back:
ACIP Recommends Adding COVID-19 Vaccination to All Schedules
The World Council for Health came out with a notice when that happened, and you know what they said? They said, “Parents are urged to adopt a common sense, safer to wait approach.”
5 studies show now, in today's world of, you know, cleanliness and the way we live today, not 100 years ago, but the way we live today, five studies show children who go natural with no childhood vaccines have better outcomes: lower rates of atopic dermatitis, tympanostomy (sp?) tubes, oral pharyngitis, lower rates of seizures, neuropsychiatric disorders like attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, autism spectrum disorder. Better to go natural. A worldwide evidence-based body says, “Until things clarify, go natural.”
MUST SEE VIDEO: Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier? (2024 update). It’s a 22-minute documentary on the eye-opening results of four studies released recently to compare the overall, long-term health of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.
Warrier and colleagues showed among those young individuals, among those young individuals who have taken the gender journey, they are scoring off the Richter scale for autism:
Those who take the transgender journey have “pronounced increases in mental healthcare for adjustment, anxiety, mood, personality, psychotic disorders, and suicide.” The drugs make the kids sick – the puberty blockers, androgens, and estrogens. And it worsens the burden of psychiatric disease.
Mortality is up in every study of young individuals taking the transgender surgery and medicine. Taking the transgender surgery and medicine increases the rate of mortality:
Analysis of Mortality Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults in England
So to summarize, transgender medicine in the youth, it makes the kids sick, the surgery is dysfiguring, it's sterilizing, and it increases mortality. That's the reason why in Texas, we have it banned, and I wrote the expert report to make that happen.
The Circle of Medical Freedom Was Fractured
We're here, and I'm going to finish on this, because the circle of medical freedom is related to social and economic freedoms. That's the reason why we're here. That's where this started. The circle of medical freedom was fractured, and we saw everything put us on our heels, and we now are digging in and rebuilding.
Conclusions
So to finish and conclude:
- The pandemic response has been a global disaster.
- The safety profile and expecterd serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination are well known
- Limitations of theoretical efficacy have evolved over time – no one believes that vaccines work.
- Prehospital phase of care was always where the action was and will be the case with Disease X.
- We're facing this twin epidemic of autism and transgenderism, and it actually may be related to childhood over-vaccination as an ideology.
- Censorship and reprisal are working to crush our freedoms, scienific discourse, and medical progress. And that's the reason why each and every one of us need to be as bold and relentless as we possibly can.
So I want to finish and thank you, and thank you, Michigan, for having me back home. I want everybody here to understand that the moment for you is now. There is no time that's more decisive. Don't look for an elected official to save you. It's not going to happen. You save yourself, and you save your family, and you save your friends, and make your community as wide and broad and healthy as you possibly can.
I'm Dr. Peter McCullough. Thank you so much for having me.
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
