1

Blueberries and Green Beans Join EWG’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ List of Pesticide-Drenched Produce

|

Source: ewg.org

Government tests found 54 different pesticides on blueberries and 84 on green beans

WASHINGTON – Thirty years after a landmark National Academies of Sciences study warning of the dangers posed to children by pesticides, 75 percent of non-organic fruits and vegetables sold in the U.S. are still riddled with the potentially toxic agricultural chemicals, according to the Environmental Working Group’s 2023 Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce™, released today.

This year, blueberries and green beans join the Dirty Dozen™, the Shopper’s Guide section listing the 12 non-organic, or conventionally grown, fruits and vegetables with the highest amounts of pesticides, based on federal agencies’ tests. Some of the pesticides detected have been banned in the U.S. or Europe because of concerns about how they harm people.

“Despite the abundance of science linking exposure to pesticides with serious health issues, a potentially toxic cocktail of concerning chemicals continues to taint many of the non-organic fruits and vegetables eaten by consumers,” said Alexis Temkin, Ph.D., EWG toxicologist.

The findings underscore the need for stronger regulations around and oversight of how pesticides are used on food crops.

The Shopper’s Guide compiles EWG’s analysis of the latest fruit and vegetable testing data from the Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration. The 2023 edition includes data from 46,569 samples of 46 fruits and vegetables, covering 251 different pesticides.

In addition to the Dirty Dozen, the guide includes the Clean Fifteen™, EWG’s list of the fruits and vegetables with very low or no traces of pesticides. The guide also features a full report on pesticides on produce and more detailed analyses about specific fruits and vegetables and what chemicals were found on them.

“Everyone – adults and kids – should eat more fruits and vegetables, whether organic or not,“ Temkin said. “A produce-rich diet provides many health benefits.

“But in the ongoing absence of meaningful federal oversight, consumers concerned about pesticide exposure can use EWG’s Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce to navigate the produce aisle in ways that work best for them and their families,” Temkin said.

EWG recommends that consumers buy organic versions of Dirty Dozen produce and choose either conventionally grown or organic versions of Clean Fifteen items..

Blueberries and green beans

Both blueberries and green beans – 11th and 12th, respectively, on this year’s Dirty Dozen – had troubling concentrations of organophosphate insecticides, pesticides that can harm the human nervous system. Nine out of 10 samples of each of the popular foods had residues of pesticides – with some showing traces of up to 17 different pesticides.

Nearly 80 percent of blueberry samples had two or more pesticides. Phosmet was detected on more than 10 percent of blueberry samples and malathion on 9 percent. Both are organophosphates that are toxic to the human nervous system, especially children’s developing brains. In 2015, malathion was classified as probably carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

More than 70 percent of green beans had at least two pesticides, with a combined 84 different pesticides found on the entire crop. Six percent of samples showed residues of acephate, a toxic pesticide the Environmental Protection Agency banned for use on green beans more than 10 years ago. Green beans also had traces of several pesticides banned in the European Union but allowed in the U.S.

The health risks posed by pesticides

Pesticides are toxic by design, created expressly to kill living organisms – insects, plants and fungi considered “pests.” But many pesticides pose health dangers to people, too, including cancer, hormone disruption, and brain and nervous system toxicity. These hazards have been confirmed by independent scientists, physicians, and U.S. and international government agencies.

Most pesticide residues found by the USDA and FDA fall below government limits and are legal. But legal limits don’t always indicate what’s safe for human consumption.

The conventional agriculture industry, and even the EPA, often claim pesticides like chlorpyrifos are safe, right up until the moment they are banned because of overwhelming evidence showing they are toxic to humans.

Children are especially vulnerable to many of the health harms associated with pesticide exposure. Research published by EWG in 2020 found that the EPA, which oversees pesticide safety, fails to adequately consider children in setting legal limits for 90 percent of the most common pesticides.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends parents concerned about their children’s exposure to pesticides consult EWG’s Shopper’s Guide.

“EWG’s Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce is a key tool for parents and caregivers concerned about protecting vulnerable children from the potential serious risks of consuming even low levels of pesticides in food,” said Dr. Philip Landrigan, renowned public health expert and one of the principal authors of the 1993 National Academies of Sciences study on pesticides in children’s diets.

Also in 1993, EWG released its first report, Pesticides in Children’s Food, which analyzed federal government consumption data and pesticide tests of more than 20,000 samples of food, among other government and industry data. The exhaustive investigation found that millions of U.S. children were receiving up to 35 percent of their entire lifetime dose of some carcinogenic pesticides by age 5.

“The Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen provide simple guidelines for how to pursue a diet rich in vital fruits and vegetables, while avoiding the items that might be most contaminated with chemicals,” said Landrigan, director of the Global Public Health Program and Global Observatory on Planetary Health in the Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society at Boston College.

###

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that empowers people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment. Through research, advocacy and unique education tools, EWG drives consumer choice and civic action. Visit www.ewg.org for more information.



‘No Doubt’ Fauci Funded Gain-of-Function Research That Likely Led to Pandemic, Former CDC Director Tells Lawmakers

|

On March 8, 2023, former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield testified at the House COVID hearing and said that there is “no doubt” the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research that likely resulted in the creation of COVID-19 and its subsequent leak.

Source: The Defender | By READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…

Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on Wednesday said he has “no doubt” the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research that likely resulted in the creation of COVID-19 and its subsequent leak.

Redfield made the statement during the first formal hearing of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

The hearing included testimony related to the lab leak theory as a plausible explanation as the origin of COVID-19 and how the theory was shut down early in the pandemic in favor of narratives that COVID-19 had zoogenic — or natural — origins.

Committee members and witnesses also debated the future of gain-of-function research.

Other witnesses Wednesday included: Jamie Metzl, Ph.D., J.D., senior fellow at the Atlantic Council; Nicholas Wade, former New York Times science editor and former deputy editor of Nature; and Paul G. Auwaerter, M.D., MBA, clinical director in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

The hearing followed the subcommittee’s release of a memo revealing that key NIH figures, including Fauci, helped persuade virologists to write an influential article squelching the theory that COVID-19 may have leaked from a lab and asserting the virus evolved naturally.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) last month determined SARS CoV-2 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China — a theory later endorsed by FBI Director Christopher Wray. These developments helped lead to a Senate vote to declassify U.S. intelligence documents on the origins of COVID-19.

Gain-of-function research ‘caused the greatest pandemic our world has seen’

Some of the witnesses called for gain-of-function research to be slowed down, paused or stopped entirely.

Redfield testified that the “COVID-19 pandemic presents a case study on the potential dangers of such research,” and said, “we should call for a moratorium on gain-of-function research until we have a broader debate and we come to a consensus as a community about the value of [such] research.”

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…

Watch more of Dr. Redfield’s testimony:



Anthony Fauci Admits That Vaccines Do NOT Generate Immunity Against Covid, Flu, And Other Respiratory Diseases

|

Source: The WinePress

“Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.”

After three years of habitually urging the public to get a Covid-19 vaccine, to not only protect ourselves but others around us from contracting and spreading Covid, that the vaccines were the only way to “stop the spread,” and after nearly 80% of the American population has received at least one dose, and 68% got two, and 33% with three injections – Dr. Anthony Fauci and his constituents are now saying that both old and new vaccines are not effective in generating immunity against viral diseases like Covid or the flu.

Fauci, along with Dr. David M. Morens, Senior Advisor to the Director at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., a Senior Investigator for Viral Pathogenesis & Evolution Section at NIAID – recently published a paper in the journal Cell, that discusses vaccines and their effectiveness against ailments like Covid, influenza, RSV, and the common cold.

The paper is called “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses.”

In the opening summary, the doctors wrote:

“Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.

In this review, we examine challenges that have impeded development of effective mucosal respiratory vaccines, emphasizing that all of these viruses replicate extremely rapidly in the surface epithelium and are quickly transmitted to other hosts, within a narrow window of time before adaptive immune responses are fully marshaled.

We discuss possible approaches to developing next-generation vaccines against these viruses, in consideration of several variables such as vaccine antigen configuration, dose and adjuventation, route and timing of vaccination, vaccine boosting, adjunctive therapies, and options for public health vaccination polices.”

In the early introduction of the paper, the authors admit that long before Covid fears were on the scene the flu was the dominant annual threat, but had “less than suboptimal vaccines” available to the public to prevent infection.

The authors followed that with this admission:

“Over the years, influenza vaccines have never been able to elicit durable protective immunity against seasonal influenza virus strains, even against non-drifted strains.

Although current influenza vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death to some degree, their effectiveness against clinically apparent infection is decidedly suboptimal, ranging from 14% to 60% over the past 15 influenza seasons.”

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE….



Moderna CEO Admits That In 2019 He KNEW In Advance that “Next Year Is Going To Be a Pandemic”

|

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, speaking at a World Economic Forum event, admitted that he knew in 2019 (before the pandemic started) that Moderna would have to increase their vaccine production to a billion doses in 2020 because “next year is going to be a pandemic.” Check it out:

.
Also, check out the article and video referenced in the above video:

Shocking New Study Reveals Covid Jabs Are Actually ‘Weapons of Mass Depopulation’



Gregg Braden – Four Things You Can Do to Thrive and Extend Your Lifespan in the Changing World

|

Source: Gregg Braden Official

Gregg Braden shares 4 things you can do to thrive and extend your lifespan in this fast-changing world: nutrition, exercise, supplements, and heart-brain coherence.



Is Aging Reversible? A Scientific Look with David Sinclair | TEDxBoston

|

Source: TEDx Talks

Have you ever wondered how long you will live? And if so, how could you change that number to live drastically longer? The science might be in your favor: follow David Sinclair, Australian biologist and professor of genetics at Harvard University, as he shares his research on slowing and reversing the process of aging in mice, and how the same technology may someday be transferable to humans. David Sinclair, Australian biologist and professor of genetics at Harvard University, shares his insightful research into the science of age reversal and anti-aging medicine.

David Sinclair, Australian biologist and professor of genetics at Harvard University, shares his insightful research into the science of age reversal and anti-aging medicine. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community.

NOTE FROM TED: Research around aging discussed in this talk remains an ongoing field of study. Please do not look to this talk for health advice. TEDx events are independently organized by volunteers.



Covid-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries | Capitol Hill Forum Highlights + Full Hearing

|

U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hosted a forum of world-renowned experts in Public Health, Science, Medicine, Law, and Journalism, in a public forum titled, “Covid-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries,” held in the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building, on Capitol Hill on December 7, 2022. You will also hear testimony from victims of Covid vaccine injury.

Speakers Include Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., OpenVAERS Founder, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Dr. Harvey Risch, Journalist, Del Bigtree, and more.

Watch the highlights immediately below and the full hearing below that:

https://consciouslifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Senate-hearing360p.mp4

Source: The Highwire
.

Note: Also check out the brilliant new feature on The Highwire consisting of short, factual clips about Covid and the jab that you can watch and share:
https://TheHighwire.com/GetFactsinated



Zero-Cost Method to Increase Motivation and Dopamine | Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman [VIDEO+TRANSCRIPT]

|

Source: Optimum Psychology

Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman shares studies on how cold water exposure increases motivation and dopamine. This method increases motivation and dopamine even better than sex and nicotine.

TRANSCRIPT
So we’ve been focusing a lot for the last few minutes on the kind of darker side of dopamine and how getting big peaks in dopamine can be detrimental. But I want to acknowledge the truth, which is that dopamine feels great. Being in pursuit and motivated and craving things feels wonderful. And I don’t want to demonize dopamine.

What I’m trying to do today is to illustrate how dopamine works in your brain so that you can continue to engage in dopamine-evoking activities. And certainly, there is a place for ingesting things that can increase dopamine provided that they are safe for us in the short and long term. There are activities that we can do that will give us healthy, sustained increases in dopamine, both the peaks (when they happen), and to maintain or even increase our baseline levels of dopamine. So how do we do that? What are some of these activities?

Well, in recent years, there’s been a trend toward more people doing so-called cold exposure. In part, this was popularized by Wim Hof, the so-called Iceman. Getting into cold showers, taking ice baths, and exposing oneself to cold water of various kinds can in fact increase our levels of dopamine, as well as the neuromodulator norepinephrine.

This is not a new phenomenon. In the 1920s, a guy by the name of Vincent Priessniz was one of the first people to popularize and formalize cold water therapies. He was an advocate of cold water exposure in order to boost the immune system and increase feelings of well-being. And actually this practice dates back long before Vincent popularized it, and Wim Hof is the more recent iteration of this.

First of all, some of the safety parameters. Let’s establish those first. Getting into very, very cold water, you know 30 degree Fahrenheit or even low 40 degree Fahrenheit can put somebody into a state of cold water shock. I mean people can die doing that. So obviously you want to approach this with some caution.

But for most people getting into 60 degreE water or 50 degree water or if you’re, acclimated and comfortable with it, you know, 40 degree water or 45 degree water can have tremendously beneficial results on your neuromodulator systems, including dopamine.

What temperature of water you can tolerate will depend on how cold water adapted you are and how familiar you are with the experience of getting into cold water. And when I say comfortable with, I should mention there is never a case in which getting into cold water does not evoke a release of epinephrine. So the quickening of the breath, the widening of the eyes, the feeling is if you can’t catch your breath and even some physical pain at the level of the skin. That happens almost every time, or every time that you get into cold water, even if you’re cold water adapted.

What almost everybody knows and understands is that that wall, as I like to refer to it, is coming. That’s always the first experience of getting into cold water. There’s no real way around that.

Now, the study that I mentioned earlier – human physiological responses to immersion into water of different temperatures, a really interesting study that was done and published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology. I can provide a link to that study in the show caption. It’s a really interesting study. They looked at people getting exposed to water that was warm, moderately cold, or very cold. It was 32 degrees Celsius, 20 degrees Celsius, or 14 degrees Celsius. You can just put those online and do the conversion or you can do the conversion to Fahrenheit if you like, but in any case what they looked at, were the concentrations of things like epinephrine and dopamine and so on.

And what they found was really interesting. First of all, upon getting into cold water, the changes in adrenaline and noradrenaline, epinephrine and norepinephrine were immediate and fast. And these were huge increases. So that’s the getting into the cold water that everybody experiences, these huge increases in adrenaline. But then what was interesting is they observed that dopamine levels started to rise somewhat slowly and then continue to rise and reach levels as high as 2.5 times above baseline. That’s a remarkably high increase.

Remember if we go back to our examples of chocolate, sex – a doubling above baseline; nicotine – two and a half times above baseline; cocaine. The increase in dopamine from a cold water exposure of this kind was comparable to what one sees from cocaine, except in this case it wasn’t a rise and crash, it was actually a sustained rise in dopamine that took a very long time up to three hours to come back down to baseline, which is really remarkable. And I think this explains some of the positive mental and physical effects that people report, subjectively, after doing cold water exposure.

One question that many of you are probably asking is just how cold should the water be? Well, you could mimic what was done in this study and do 14 degrees Celsius (57 degrees Fahrenheit), but for some people that won’t be cold enough, and for some people that will be too cold.

They did look at the release of stress hormones like cortisol. In addition to the release of things like epinephrine and adrenaline, and it’s interesting that they noted that in all cases, but especially at that coldest temperature, there was an increase in cortisol, but that it was transient – that eventually people’s cortisol, their stress hormone, subsided a bit.

There are basically two different approaches to remaining in the cold when it’s uncomfortable. One is to try and relax yourself: to try and practice slow breathing, to try and dilate your gaze. I’ve talked about this before in previous podcasts. You go into panoramic vision to essentially try and calm yourself so that it’s not as stressful in the cold.

Other people, however, take the approach of trying to ramp up their level of internal autonomic arousal, meaning to get really energized and kind of lean into the friction of the cold, and they find that easier. Other people distract themselves, they recite the alphabet, or they do something anything to try and distract themselves from the discomfort. To be totally honest, it does not matter for sake of dopamine release, because the dopamine release is triggered and then continues. Even after you get out of the cold water.

Now in this study it was long exposure to cold water. It was an hour that’s a long period of time, and I do warn you against getting into cold water, that’s so cold that it will make your temperature drop and make you hyperthermic for an hour. That actually could be dangerous for a lot of people. You might have a hard time reheating, and hypothermia is not a good thing. They had people monitoring subjects in these studies and paying attention to their core body temperature. They were able to reheat them afterwards.

It’s well established now that getting into cold water, whether or not it’s a shower an ice bath, circulating cold water, a stream, etc. – that can evoke the norepinephrine release immediately and the long arc of that dopamine release. Why would that be good?

Up until now, I’ve basically said getting increases in dopamine is detrimental to your baseline. Well, this does appear to raise the baseline of dopamine for substantial periods of time and most people report feeling a heightened level of calm end Focus after getting out of cold water. So cold water exposure turns out to be a very potent stimulus for shifting the entire milieu the entire environment of our brain and body, and allowing many people to feel much, much better for a substantial period of time after getting out of the ice bath or cold water of any kind than they did before.

Now you might ask how often to do this? Some people do this every day. It can be very stimulating, so typically doing it early in in the day is going to be better. I don’t necessarily recommend doing it right before sleep, but some people do it in the afternoon. And some people will indeed do that seven days a week, other people three days a week, other people every once in a while.

What I can say is once you become cold water adapted, once it no longer has the same impact of novelty and feeling a bit like a (I don’t want to say a shock to your system because you don’t want to go into cold water shock), but once it is comfortable for you, then it will no longer evoke this release. There really does seem to be something in the pathway from cold water exposure through the norepinephrine pathway and into the mesolimbic brain stem that causes this release in dopamine.

But nonetheless, it’s basically zero cost. I mean you need access to water of some sort: cold water shower, etc. But basically zero cost way of triggering a long lasting increase in dopamine without ingesting anything, no pharmacology whatsoever. Please again approach it with safety and caution in mind, but it is a very potent stimulus. Again, a 250 percent of a rise in baseline, two and a half times rise in baseline rivals that of cocaine, which is really remarkable.



Died Suddenly – Full Documentary

|

Died Suddenly graphically shows long, calamari-like clots being extracted from the blood vessels of people who died after taking the jab. Also discussed is the dramatic increase in stillbirths.

Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them.

The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award-winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.



You Will Never Lack Willpower Again! | Here’s How You Can “Surf the Urge” [8-MIN VIDEO]

|

Source: Mindset Mentor

In this brilliant, 8-minute video, psychologist Kelly McGonigal, PhD, teaches a simple and very effective strategy to resist temptation by surfing the urge.

Fair Use Disclaimer
Copyright disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.



The Secret To LOOKING YOUNGER & HEALTHIER Explained! | Dr. David Sinclair

|

Source: Dr Rangan Chatterjee Clips

In this interview with Dr. Rangan Chatterjee, David Sinclair explains the secret to looking younger and feeling healthier.

David Sinclair, a Harvard professor and author of Lifespan: Why We Age – And Why We Don’t Have To, is a revolutionary thinker and ground-breaking scientist who’s on a mission to make you younger. He is one of the world’s leading scientific authorities on longevity, aging, and how to slow its effects.

Watch the FULL CONVERSATION HERE:



Some of Those Who Ridiculed and Shunned the Unvaxxed Now Want to Be Forgiven

|


.

Here’s the article that is featured in the above video:

LET’S DECLARE A PANDEMIC AMNESTY

The Jab NEVER Worked as Advertised by Fauci (2-Min Video)

And the Jab Does NOT Stop Transmission (Pfizer Admitted Their Jab Was Never Tested for That)


.

Also, see this in-depth article by Dr. Mercola about Pfizer’s admission:

‘Speed of Science’ — A Scandal Beyond Your Wildest Nightmare

And the article that Dr. Mercola wrote over a year ago about the jab NOT stopping Covid transmission:

Vaccine Passports: Why Bother if Shots Don’t Prevent Infection, Transmission?

Sadly, The Jab Is Killing People in Unprecedented Numbers

Here’s Why the Jab Is Killing People (start the video at 14:00)

Also, check out Dr. Botha’s incredible footage showing what’s in the jab:

https://consciouslifenews.com/blood-doctor-zandre-botha-reveals-horrific-findings-after-examining-covid-vials-and-the-blood-of-vaxxed-patients/11208338/

Ben Shapiro ADMITS He Was Fooled

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” ― Mark Twain

https://winepressnews.com/2022/10/26/ben-shapiro-says-we-were-lied-to-by-everyone-after-advocating-everyone-get-a-covid-vaccine-for-over-a-year/

Is there anybody out there who was also fooled and wants to apologize to a friend or loved one for shaming and shunning them because they refused to take the jab? If so, please do so. It will help to heal the emotional trauma of being shunned.

Personally, I forgive everyone who blindly followed orders, got the jab, and ridiculed others for not doing likewise. It’s quite possible that they were being mind controlled or under the influence of mass psychosis.

However, I do not forgive those who are knowingly committing genocide.



DIED SUDDENLY | Official Trailer – Streaming November 21st

|

Source: Stew Peters Network

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” ~ The Georgia Guidestones

Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet…we never seem to believe them. In this Stew Peters Network EXCLUSIVE, the award-winning filmmakers behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES present the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.

Watch the 4-minute trailer for the upcoming movie “Died Suddenly” about the massive number of sudden deaths after taking the jab. The full movie will be available on November 21, 2022 – one day before the 59th anniversary of the JFK assassination.



Act NOW: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop Covid Mandates (After ACIP Voted To Add COVID-19 Injections to the Childhood Schedule)

|

Source: Children’s Health Defense

The regulatory agencies and their advisory committees have gone amok. It’s time for people to stop consenting and stop complying.

Act Now: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop COVID Mandates

Despite immense blowback, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted unanimously to add COVID-19 injections to its recommended schedule of vaccinations for infants, children, and adolescents. The committee members’ votes solidify their steadfast loyalty to protecting pharma profits at the cost of children’s lives. This is the first step to granting permanent, blanket liability protection for all current and future COVID-19 injections.

This is a declaration of war on our children. The responsibility to be unrelenting as we defend the next generation from Big Pharma now falls on us. In the coming months, nearly every state in the nation will universally adopt the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule.

This vote solidifies the capture and corruption of the agencies put in place to protect public health. It’s clear this is not about protecting public health rather protecting Big Pharma by granting permanent liability protection. With the addition of this vaccine to the childhood schedule there will be zero recourse for the injured moving forward.

We need YOU to hold the line and remind CDC, FDA and our elected officials that it’s their duty to protect the public health of American children and citizens. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in children. Vaccines authorized for emergency use are not permitted to be recommended to the childhood schedule.

There is no emergency in our children that would warrant the hasty and unscientific addition of a vaccine that has not been proven safe or effective.

Act Now: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop COVID Mandates

We know you are outraged and want to take action immediately. There are two things you can do. First, demand CDC and elected officials protect our children from COVID-19 mandates.

Next, get ahead of school mandates by reaching out to your own school district’s superintendent, and your state’s education commissioner to plead for their intercession on behalf of our children. Make clear to your superintendent and commissioner that exemptions are not enough and that you will be pulling your child from school if this vaccine is mandated for attendance, costing the district tens of thousands of dollars in funding. Parents hold the power — don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.



Clear Proof the Vaccine is Dangerous and That The CDC Concealed It

|

By: A Midwestern Doctor (click the link to read the full article)

Aaron Siri was finally able to force the CDC to relinquish their V-safe data, which showed over 10% of recipients suffered significant adverse reactions to vaccination. This article will explain why that is so important.

Introduction

One of the major challenges with the COVID-19 vaccination has been that it has been impossible to get any clear safety data on it. The two key issues have been:

Suppression of Data Showing The Vaccines Were Not Safe:

  • Clinical trials of the vaccines were for all practical purposes fraudulent and massively underreporting adverse events.
  • Many of the adverse event databases are not being reported by the government unless they are anonymously leaked by a whistleblower (e.g. here, here or here) or forced into the open by a lawsuit.
  • Mass censorship of reporting “unsafe” adverse responses to vaccination on every media platform.

For example, it was recently revealed that the Israeli government deliberately concealed concerning signs of vaccine safety so that it could push the vaccine through. Given that Israel’s government served as Pfizer’s laboratory for their vaccine, this was of immense consequence globally as governments around the world pushed the vaccine forward on the basis of Pfizer’s fraudulent safety data. Steve Kirsch also has been able to demonstrate that the CDC’s committee that determines the appropriateness of these vaccines is willfully ignoring this data.

Design Flaws in the Existing Adverse Event Reporting Systems:

  • Massive underreporting occurring globally within the existing vaccine safety monitoring systems (e.g. VAERS).
  • It being impossible to know the denominator (how many total people were the adverse reactions observed in) to calculate the actual adverse event rate that is occurring.
  • Since VAERS is a passive reporting system, it is “not possible” to determine causality from it.

Because of this, VAERS has been able to demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine is much more dangerous that any previous vaccination, but nothing has been done with its data because it is not “reliable.”

VAERS thus occupies a curious position. It is repeatedly cited when it is needed (e.g. to fulfill the required pharmacovigilance role for the FDA) but disparaged as worthless whenever its data is cited to suggest potential harm from vaccination. Many have recognized the shortcomings in VAERS, and attempts have been made to produce more reliable systems, however as these systems tend to then produce evidence vaccines are in fact quite harmful, they are then scrapped (e.g. the ESP:VAERS project).

V-Safe

Due to the unprecedented nature of the “emergency” COVID-19 vaccination campaign (a completely novel vaccine was developed in one-tenth of the time normally required for the basic safety testing to bring a vaccine to market and then forced onto the entire world), a significant amount of the safety testing had to be performed after the vaccine had already been given to the world’s population.

I cannot find direct proof of this, but I am relatively certain that it was decided that since the vaccine had to be tested on the general population and no existing mechanism existed to effectively track vaccine safety, V-Safe was developed to fulfill this role.

V-Safe briefly was a phone app the initial recipients of the vaccine (e.g. healthcare workers who could be expected to be reliable reporters of adverse events) were given and instructed to use to communicate to report their experiences. This approach is very important because this data was prospective (this data is always more reliable than retrospective data and considered necessary to demonstrate causality) and because the total number of participants was known (which is necessary to demonstrate the rate at which adverse events occurred). The CDC was also supposed to follow up with individuals who reported adverse events, although I am somewhat doubtful this occurred.

Here are some brief descriptions of V-Safe:

Not surprisingly, V-safe’s data was never made available to the public, with the CDC giving the excuse that they needed to anonymize the data in order to protect patient confidentiality so that releasing the data could be stalled out indefinitely. To any astute observer, this is a clear admission of the data within V-safe was very concerning as the CDC could not afford to publicly release it (the federal government will always try to come up with excuses to indefinitely stall on releasing incriminating data best shown with the FDA demanding decades to curate and release Pfizer’s documents).

Fortunately, Aaron Siri, an attorney who has spent years fighting for vaccine safety on behalf of ICAN and Del Bigtree, after 463 days of work was finally able to force the CDC to release the V-Safe data. Given how concerning this data this raises serious concerns on who decided it was appropriate to withhold that data from the public.

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…