Environmental technology is a broad field that encompasses a variety of fields. It is used to monitor natural environments, conserve natural resources, and curb the effects of human activities. These technologies are also known as green chemistry, clean technology, or clean technology. Many of the technologies in this field are related to conservation. These industries are growing rapidly, and it is vital to make sure that the technologies we use are not detrimental to the environment. Listed below are some of the ways that green technology is being used.
Australian technology news reports indicate environmental technologies are increasingly addressing underdeveloped problems and promise to improve societal outcomes. These innovations span the spectrum from data to materials, and are gaining attention as they offer sustainable and societal benefits. These technologies are also generating significant commercial impact. By exploring underdeveloped markets, these technologies are providing solutions to pressing societal challenges while ensuring a sustainable future. Here are a few examples of such industries. All of these technologies are demonstrating promise for commercial and societal impact.
The positive impacts of environmental technology include renewable energy, electric vehicles, and “smart technology.” This new era in sustainable development is driven by the Paris climate agreement that limits the rise of global temperature to two degrees Celsius. Aside from these, environmental technologies can also be used for the public good, such as carbon-free energy or electric vehicles. There is a great deal of scope for innovation in this field and it is imperative to understand the impact that they can have on society.
The skills and knowledge that an environmental technician needs to keep the environment healthy and safe are vital in the field of environmental technology. Their work is critical for the health of the environment and to the protection of natural resources. In addition, they will analyze the quality of air, water, and soil, and protect the environment from contaminants. Moreover, they are also responsible for the proper management of information, which is essential for the effective implementation of environmental technologies. Soil and water quality analysis is a key part of this profession.
In addition to creating jobs, environmental technology helps save the planet from many environmental threats. In addition to preventing further pollution, it also ensures the efficient use of natural resources
Several countries are developing environmental technologies. The development of these technologies will result in improved air quality and water quality. It is expected that the environmental technologies market will grow as governments focus on specific environmental issues. The growth of these industries will be a benefit to all nations. As a result, they will create jobs for citizens in developing countries. This will lead to more investment in environmental technology and the reduction of global warming and its effects. This will be a boon to many countries and help them to develop more environmentally friendly products.
As the world’s population continues to grow, environmental technologies are essential to maintaining a healthy environment. The creation of new technologies will improve the efficiency of manufacturing processes and can reduce pollution and help protect the earth. The use of new technologies will help to balance the developed world with the natural world. It will also help to preserve the global environment. There are many reasons for the development of these new environmental technologies. The first is the development of renewable energy sources.
Sustainability In Australia
The Australian mining industry’s commitment to environmental sustainability and biodiversity restoration are top priorities, in line with the industry’s commitment to achieving net-zero emissions targets by 2050.
All industry professionals are invited to participate in the survey. The goal is to create a benchmark from the results that can be measured annually, providing a useful industry-wide resource for future planning and environmental strategy.
Sustainability is no longer just a catchphrase, but an ecological, economic and social drive that changes our everyday life in almost every imaginable way. This is evident across the business world, where the commitment to sustainable practices is no longer a “nice to have” but a “must do” as the negative impacts of climate change become more apparent and threatening and have the potential to take anything from supply modify chains to profitability.
The first step towards sustainability is to increase awareness. There are many different levels of awareness and action that we can take. By making a conscious effort to increase our knowledge about the subject, we can improve our understanding of the issues surrounding our planet. By implementing new technologies, we can make our world a more sustainable place. There are many ways to do this. It’s important to educate ourselves and make decisions that will benefit the environment. In addition, we must also consider our social responsibility when developing a sustainable future.
The term sustainability covers a variety of practices and strategies. Its principles include promoting equality and promoting social justice. In addition, it seeks to protect the environment. Companies that pursue sustainability goals have a responsibility to protect the environment and to avoid the resulting damage. Using green technologies to produce goods and services can reduce pollution and conserve energy. These innovations have many benefits for the environment.
A sustainable society is based on equal access to energy, clean water, food, and shelter. It also provides equal opportunities for employment, economic opportunities, and a high quality of life for everyone. In addition to these, sustainability focuses on the issues surrounding these factors. It is essential to consider the economic and social pillars of a sustainable society in order to create a sustainable future. There are many benefits of a more sustainable society.
The concept of environmental sustainability can be applied to a number of aspects of a company’s operations. It can be applied to individuals and corporations. It can also be incorporated into national and international law. It can affect local lifestyles and the environment. Ultimately, it can benefit society in the long run and help combat poverty. But how do we go about incorporating sustainability into our daily lives? Here are a few examples of sustainability initiatives. When implemented correctly, they can lead to a sustainable future for all concerned.
Eco-Friendly Home Organizing Tips & Benefits
I bet you didn’t realize that arranging your house helps the environment. You’ll appreciate these environmentally-friendly cleaning and organizing suggestions!
Taking care of the environment is an essential element of spring cleaning. In fact, by cleaning and arranging your house, you are doing your part for the environment.
True, it’s really happening! A few simple and useful eco-friendly home organization suggestions are on the way. Your house will become more organized, and you’ll learn some environmentally-friendly behaviors at the same time.
On April 22, Earth Day is observed. On this day, we remember the significance of protecting our planet, and it should serve as a reminder for us all that we must do our part.
5 Eco-Friendly Benefits of Getting Organized
Here are a few things you may not have known before we get into the specifics of how you may be environmentally friendly while organizing your house. Taking care of the environment provides many personal advantages as well.
1. Using less and wasting less is the first step to saving money.
The first benefit of being structured for the environment is that it reduces waste.
There are environmental benefits to maintaining just what you value and utilize, as well. Humanity as a whole consumes and discards a large number of goods. When arranging drawers, one of the most typical concerns is, “Where am I going to put all this stuff!” There is so much!
It’s very uncommon for individuals to find that they have more than they need when they arrange their belongings and begin to simplify their lives and purchase less. As a whole, this is healthier for the environment and landfills.
2. Prevents Duplicate purchases.
You can avoid overspending if you have your finances in order.
When you can’t seem to track down a certain shade of nail paint, you know how frustrating it can be. So you go out and purchase another, only to discover it in another place a few days later. Yes, it often occurs, although it is more common in chaotic settings.
However, if you keep your drawers tidy, you’ll always be able to locate what you need—buying it once can save you time and money in the long run, especially if you’re purchasing it online.
3. You’re Able to Make Smarter Choices.
The more organized you are, the more time you have to make environmentally friendly purchases.
It’s worth pondering. After you’ve cleaned and arranged your kitchen, it’s time to take a look at the cleaning products you’re using. Are they environmentally friendly? Is it harmful? It’s a logical next step in the process.
4. It’s Good for Others to Donate.
Another typical step in organizing your house is to give away some of your less-used belongings to others who might use them. It reduces waste and avoids overconsumption by donating. You are extending the life of your belongings by donating them rather than dumping them in the trash.
In addition, gifting is a wonderful way to promote goodwill. For example, donating new or almost new clothing to women’s shelters provides these ladies a little piece of beauty at a time when they most need it.
5. There’s less of a strain.
Stress may lead to a variety of bad behaviors, many of which come from a lack of self-control. And according to scientists, living in a chaotic environment raises your level of stress.
Organize one area at a time to alleviate some of your tension. You’ll gradually begin to experience a greater sense of well-being! Revel in these wonderful feelings and use them as a motivation to make more environmentally-friendly purchases and actions.
As you clean and arrange your house, there are many little measures you can take to keep the environment in mind. Let’s take a closer look at what you can do now that you know how useful it is.
Donate First, Then Throw Away.
Donating unwanted items is the first step in organizing your property. This should be one of the most important things to focus on. Donate as much as you can rather than throwing it in the trash. In order to keep landfills at a minimum, it’s critical that we all do our part.
Donating Your Clothes.
There are a number of places that will take gently used clothing for donation. Don’t throw away damaged or discolored items unless you’re sure they can be salvaged.
Nonetheless, if you come across anything that can be worn again or is in good shape, give it.
Charity organizations that accept used clothing might be found via your church or friends. Clothes may also be donated to a local and national charity.
Where Can You Donate Electronics/Old Technology?
No, I don’t like or use them. Do you have any old gadgets that are still functional? Donate them instead of throwing them away. You may also attempt to resell them on Mercari and eBay as a first step.
You may also donate your old devices to certain well-known donation centers.
Don’t throw anything away.
You can recycle a lot of things, such as plastics and metal. These things should not be thrown away. Instead, use what you can and recycle the rest.
Recycling has a wide range of subtleties. You’ll need to separate and recycle each item individually when it comes time to recycle your old items. Keep these suggestions in mind.
Electronics may be recycled at places like Best Buy, which accepts them. Battery and phone recycling are accepted through Call2Recycle.
When it comes to electronic waste, recycling is always the preferable option. In addition, you may check with your local recycling facility to see whether they take electronics. A local group may be able to assist them in this matter.
When You Don’t Have Curbside Pickup, Here’s How to Recycle.
To be honest, I believe that curbside recycling should be available in every community. I’ll confess it. It would be a huge time-saver for everyone involved. If you don’t live in a town that provides recycling, you’ll have to sort your own recyclables at home and then drive them to the nearest recycling facility.
One way to save time is to work with your neighbors to organize drop-off times together (sort of like a carpooling schedule, but for recycling).
In any case, don’t allow the hassle of recycling to prevent you from doing so.
What Can’t Be Recycled?
Paper, metal, and plastic are among the most common items that may be recycled. Some things, however, cannot be recycled.
These items should not be recycled:
Any item that has food on it is acceptable.
A plastic top for a bottle
Paper towels and napkins were thrown away.
Grocery shopping bags made of plastic
Hangers made of wire.
Clean using Eco-Friendly Products
Look for environmentally friendly cleaning supplies when you clean your house.
Green and eco-friendly are not tightly regulated terminology, so be aware of this fact. In order to determine what is genuinely safe, it will need some investigation.
To protect the earth, develop your own cleaning products. You’ll know exactly what’s in them.
Toxic Cleansing Agents To Stay Away From
There are a number of common household cleaners that are harmful to the environment. Products that are environmentally friendly may be found in this article from the EPA.
It’s a good idea to steer clear of the following frequent ingredients:
Ethoxylates of nonylphenol (NPEs)
Compotes of Quaternary Ammonia (QUATs or QACs)
Organic Compounds with a high vapor pressure (VOCs)
This medication is methylisothiazolinone (MI)
Composting Can Help You Save Space and Money.
Another simple technique to care for the environment is to physically add to the soil. Composting is a great way to do this.
In addition to reducing landfill waste, composting is an excellent source of fertilizer for your plant since it breaks down organic matter.
Almost everything may be composted, including food wastes like eggshells and vegetable peels, as well as coffee grounds and grounds.
It’s time to get rid of that pile of compost.
A stainless steel bucket with a handle is the best way to keep your composting ingredients together. So it’s out of sight; the best place to put it is beneath the sink.
Your composting pile will thank you later. Everything you need to know about composting may be found here. As a general rule, you want to keep it out of the rain so that it doesn’t become soaked. To speed up the decomposition process, you should rotate it once a week.
Composting is a natural and environmentally friendly approach to replenish soil nutrients. Gardening is a terrific use for them.
Organizing Products That Are Green And Eco-Friendly
Repurposing present items is the easiest method to be green while organizing your house. It’s a success if you can save anything from ending up in a landfill!
Great green goods created from environmentally friendly materials may be found at Royal Craft Wood. Find bamboo-based products since they are environmentally friendly.
You should also keep in mind the following while shopping for environmentally friendly garbage bins:
Materials that have been reused:
Baskets of wicker
Switch to a Paperless Office
Going paperless will reduce trash, but it will also save you a lot of time and effort in the long run. On Clutter Keeper, you’ll discover a comprehensive guide on becoming paperless.
You can do your bit to protect the environment and keep your home orderly by limiting the quantity of paper you and your family use.
Practicing Eco-Friendly Living and Organizing
You’ll find that taking care of the world also takes care of you. Even better, being green saves you money and improves your mental well-being.
7 Most Fascinating Reasons To Grow Succulent Plants
We are all well aware that plants have major benefits when it comes to the environment, but apart from that, plants have immeasurable other benefits. Among so many varieties of plants available, succulent plants have distinct properties, and fleshy or juicy texture in some of the other areas is their characteristic feature. Since succulent plants usually grow in dry regions and hence a part of them is responsible for storing water so that the process of photosynthesis can take place. Either stems or leaves of succulents store water and hence become juicy.
There are plenty of reasons that might push you towards growing more and more succulent plants, but here is a list of the 7 most fascinating reasons to grow succulents.
Fresh air: Plants are a source of fresh and purified air, and so are succulents. They inhale carbon dioxide from the environment and exhale oxygen, making the air around them pure and fresh. Hence, growing succulents near the places you spend most of the time (like your work table) can have great impacts on your health and hence can lift your mood immediately.
Adjust according to the surroundings: Despite growing in dry conditions, succulents can easily adjust themselves when brought in damp and moist conditions. Succulents usually grow under conditions with bright and intense sunlight, but if they are kept in places with little or even no sunlight for days, they remain fresh and continue to grow. Thus, they are easy to maintain and hence can be used widely for interior décor.
Health Benefits: Succulents have proven to be a source for getting rid of many health problems. As mentioned above, they help in lifting the mood, but apart from this, there are various other healing aspects of succulents. For example, just by consuming the leaves of stonecrops (a variety of succulents), one can easily get away with the problem of high blood pressure as it helps in reducing high BP. Apart from helping with high blood pressure, succulents possess other healing properties like helping with a sore throat or preventing dehydrated and scratchy skin.
Interior decoration: There is a wide variety of succulents available in the market, from different hues to different structures and sizes. There is every type of succulent available. The variety of succulents that come with bright colors tend to enhance the beauty of the room and hence, serve the purpose of giving life to your house. Whether it’s a tea table in your garden or a corner table in your bedroom, succulents can be used at several places around your home to light up your mood.
Therapeutic properties: There is a wide variety of succulents available that are edible and possess therapeutic properties. To name some, pink dragon fruit would be the one everyone is fond of lately. It is a pulpy white fruit and contains tiny black seeds. The high fiber content and low calories of dragon fruit, along with its delicious taste, is the reason behind its high demand among the population. Moreover, some of the succulents that are not edible still possess medicinal properties, like aloe vera that cannot be eaten but serve to soothe skin problems when applied directly to the skin.
Easy maintenance: Plants do demand a lot of attention and care, they need to be watered promptly and require adequate sunlight, but fortunately, that’s not the case with succulents. Succulents remain healthy with or without sunlight. They can continue to look beautiful even if you don’t water them for 6-7 days straight. Thus, along with the various benefits of succulents, they are also easy to maintain. This also makes them a great choice to gift succulents to your loved ones.
Helps in avoiding the risk of cancer: Succulents, cactus to be specific, are rich in antioxidants that help in maintaining the health of cells, thus preventing them from damage. Cactus leaves are found to possess qualities that help in preventing colon, prostate, liver, and even breast cancer.
Hence, succulents are full of benefits, and there are plenty of reasons to grow them. They are rich in vitamins, proteins, calcium, and iron. Also, have many health benefits, as discussed earlier in the article. Furthermore, they can be used as a masterpiece for interior decoration and is also a great option to gift your loved ones.
What Areas Can Natural Products Be Used at Home
There has been heightened awareness by many people of the products and ingredients used in their everyday life and activity. With the many lawsuits and implications from using previously produced products, many people are looking to use natural products.
Products labeled as “organic” have come under scrutiny over the last few years. This is because being organic has many possible variables. Some organizations consider products organic when others do not. It begs the question, “What does organic mean?” The same question is often asking about natural products.
What does natural mean to you?
The definition of natural products may vary depending on the person or organization that you ask. For most people, the definition of natural includes that the ingredients used in the production of the product have been sourced naturally. The ingredients have not been developed synthetically in labs or factories.
Natural skin and body care
It is only natural to be worried about the products that you put in and on your body. Often people forget that our skin, the largest organ of our bodies, is porous. Anything placed on our skin is absorbed into our bloodstream and pumped throughout our bodies. Natural deodorant for women is a healthy choice. Using natural ingredients to fight body odor will not interfere in the body’s glands and organs working the way that they are not meant to.
Natural bath and body products do not adjust your hormones and use human-created chemicals. Naturally, derived oils like coconut oil are incredibly effective in attaching themselves to dirt and bacteria.
Natural cleaning around the home
It can be a hard decision to make. While you want to have a clean home without any germs and viruses, you should be worried about VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds). Inhaling toxic fumes from cleaning agents and gardening products is the greatest reason for many civil litigation cases. Using natural products can be as effective as harsh chemically derived cleaning agents. Many chemically derived cleaning agents have been shown to cause long-term damage to carpets, floors, and other surfaces.
Citrus fruits are incredibly acidic naturally. Real lemons add a fresh smell to your home, adding it to water can clean away grease and other dirt. All while naturally cleaning your home!
Natural Pest Control
It may seem to be contradictory, but natural pest control for your home is available. Arsenic is a naturally derived poison and can kill people. Natural pest control solutions are not necessarily ineffective. Other natural remedies like essential oils, although naturally derived from plants and herbs can be incredibly potent. Essential oils are highly concentrated forms of natural products.
Natural pest control can be obtained from professional pest control companies or from growing specific plants around the house.
Living a natural life in the modern world does not demand that you live on the farm. Supermarkets stock many natural products and many professional service companies offer a natural option.
If living a natural, healthy, and sustainable lifestyle is important to you, you are sure to find options. The most important thing is to ask if the question and be on the lookout.
Americans are taught that the Boston Tea Party ignited the American Revolutionary War because the colonists found the British tea tax tea intolerable. That’s part of the story, but it misses the pivotal turning point of our history — one we need to understand now before we destroy the planet.
Eastern White Pine – the Tree Rooted in American History explains the central role of the Eastern White Pine tree in the founding and building of America, its logging history, and its current importance to wildlife and humans. The king of England prized these huge, straight White Pines as masts for ships and founded New England to provide a reliable source of pines for masts. A mast 36-inches in diameter was valued in the 1700s at $25,000 in today’s currency.
Lumbering was THE economic powerhouse. The White Pine had led to the establishment of the New England colonies. However, contention over ownership of the pine gave rise to the American Revolution! In 1775, the first American flag displayed a White Pine Tree. By 1776, the American colonies had declared their independence from Britain! By 1830, Bangor, Maine was the world’s lumber capital. By the close of the 19th century, Maine had shipped more than 18 billion board feet. Logging dramatically increased in the 20th century.
American History Is Rooted in Eastern White Pine Tree
The St. Croix River Valley on the border of Minnesota and Wisconsin supplied pine lumber that built St. Louis, Omaha, Des Moines, Kansas City, and other prairie towns. The advent of the railroads increased the demand for lumber for tracks and fuel. The video points out, “It would not be an overstatement to say that the White Pine is the tree that built the United States of America!”
The trees can live to be 200-400 years old. The White Pine is the preferred home for bear cubs and other animals as well as eagles and other birds. The wonderful piney fragrance is caused by terpenes, chemicals in the tree which provides health benefits for a variety of conditions including cancer, neurological conditions, lowering blood pressure, and boosting the immune system.
The video shows that Bob Leverett, co-founder of Native Tree Society, is working to preserve the old-growth forests. He describes them as “forest cathedrals” and speaks of the spiritual ambiance they provide.
The Native Tree Society site says:
“The Native Tree Society was originally established in 1996 as the Eastern Native Tree Society to accurately measure and record the tallest trees, historical trees, and ancient forests of Eastern North America. As the organization grew over the years we gained members from western North America and elsewhere around the world. As the membership has expanded, the original scope of the group has also expanded to include trees and forests around the globe.
In July of 2011 the overall organization changed its name to the Native Tree Society to reflect a broader geographic membership and was restructured to reflect this conceptual change. We have two formal chapters within the broader organization, the Eastern Native Tree Society (ENTS) focused on eastern North America, the Western Native Tree Society (WNTS) focused on western North America. Members from elsewhere in the world are considered to be members at large to the NTS. We hope to establish ties with tree interest groups in other continents and countries and to share our passion for trees and to promote the usage of our measurement standards and scientific goals in these areas.”
Restoring The Lost Forests of New England
The Lost Forests of New England – Eastern Old-Growth tells the story of New England’s ancient, old-growth forests… what they once were, what changes have taken place across central New England since European settlers arrived, and what our remnant old-growth stands look like today.
When Europeans arrived, 80-90% of the landscape in Massachusetts was old-growth forests with Hemlocks that could live 600 years, as well as Beech, Sugar Maples, and White Pines. Today, the old-growth forests are less than one-tenth of one percent of Massachusetts forests!
The video explains that these forests are important “carbon sinks”.
It’s not just the White Pines that have been under attack. The old-growth redwoods of Northern California are among the oldest living organisms in the world. It’s also the magnificent Redwoods.
Restoration of Redwood Forests
One Man’s Mission to Revive the Last Redwood Forests explains that David Milarch’s near-death experience inspired his quest to bring the redwood forests back from the brink of death before they are lost to humanity forever. It explains that in the US, 98% of the old-growth forests have been cut down. These trees have been on the planet for millions of years. Some trees are 2,000-4,000 years old.
These ancient cathedrals were sacrificed for profit — to be turned into tables and chairs, floors, and ships. However, that was extremely short-sighted because apart from being majestic and awe-inspiring, they hold the key to our own survival because of their absorption of carbon and provision of oxygen.
March decided to archive the genetics of the world’s largest trees before they’re gone. This short film documents his effort to save the redwood champions of Northern California from the effects of climate change. He is engaged in what he calls “assisted migration” which involved cloning the best trees, reproducing exact copies in the lab, and planting them in the cooler regions of Oregon in a climate the trees are accustomed to since California is going through a 1,000-year drought. California is the only native home of the redwoods and 96% of them were cut down.
Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is a non-profit organization that collects, propagates, archives, and replants the genetics of ancient and iconic trees to restore the natural filter system to our water and air. These trees have the ability to clean our water, and stack carbon from our atmosphere to reduce the effects of climate change like no other species. Find out more at http://www.ancienttreearchive.org
“CNN International profiled Archangel Ancient Tree Archive and its co-founder, David Milarch. He explains the reasons behind the nonprofit’s urgent mission to collect, propagate, the largest and oldest #ancienttrees, and restore the world’s #oldgrowth forests. We’re working to protect future generations from #climatechange. LEARN MORE: https://ancienttreearchive.org.”
“On December 18, 1999, Julia Butterfly Hill’s feet touched the ground for the first time in over two years, as she descended from ‘Luna,’ a thousand-year-old redwood in Humboldt County, California. Hill had climbed 180 feet up into the tree high on a mountain on December 10, 1997, for what she thought would be a two- to three-week-long ‘tree-sit.’ The action was intended to stop Pacific Lumber, a division of the Maxxam Corporation, from the environmentally destructive process of clear-cutting the ancient redwood and the trees around it. The area immediately next to Luna had already been stripped and, because, as many believed, nothing was left to hold the soil to the mountain, a huge part of the hill had slid into the town of Stafford, wiping out many homes.
Over the course of what turned into a historic civil action, Hill endured El Nino storms, helicopter harassment, a ten-day siege by company security guards, and the tremendous sorrow brought about by an old-growth forest’s destruction. This story — written while she lived on a tiny platform eighteen stories off the ground — is one that only she can tell.
Twenty-five-year-old Julia Butterfly Hill never planned to become what some have called her — the Rosa Parks of the environmental movement. She never expected to be honored as one of Good Housekeeping’s ‘Most Admired Women of 1998′ and George magazine’s ’20 Most Interesting Women in Politics,’ to be featured in People magazine’s ’25 Most Intriguing People of the Year’ issue or to receive hundreds of letters weekly from young people around the world.
Indeed, when she first climbed into Luna, she had no way of knowing the harrowing weather conditions and the attacks on her and her cause. She had no idea of the loneliness she would face or that her feet wouldn’t touch the ground for more than two years. She couldn’t predict the pain of being an eyewitness to the attempted destruction of one of the last ancient redwood forests in the world, nor could she anticipate the immeasurable strength she would gain or the life lessons she would learn from Luna. Although her brave vigil and indomitable spirit have made her a heroine in the eyes of many, Julia’s story is a simple, heartening tale of love, conviction, and the profound courage she has summoned to fight for our earth’s legacy”.
The public-shaming genius made international headlines and inspired a generation of eco-crusaders.
“Julia ‘Butterfly’ Hill poses in her tree-top shelter nearly 200 feet above the ground in December 1998, one year into her standoff with the Pacific Lumber Company in Humboldt County, California. (Yann Gamblin/Paris Match via Getty Images)
On December 10, 1997, the barefoot environmental activist Julia ‘Butterfly’ Hill climbed up a 600-year-old, 200-foot-tall redwood tree in a remote corner of Northern California, and stayed there for 738 days. A native of Arkansas, Hill had teamed up with Earth First!, a group of by-any-means-necessary, redneck-hippie eco-warriors best known for its legally dubious ‘monkey-wrenching’ protest tactics.
Hill, however, brought a Zen-like mysticism to the movement, and her motivation for occupying the tree, dubbed ‘Luna’ (‘anyone that would climb this high is a lunatic,’ she later explained), was as much about spirituality as it was politics. ‘There’s no way to be in the presence of these ancient beings and not be affected,’ the exhausted 24-year-old told a group of reporters after descending the tree in December, 1999. ‘There’s something more than profit, and that’s life.’
People had been tree sitting before Julia Butterfly came along. But Hill ushered in a new sense of urgency and determination, the likes of which were completely irresistible to the press. Between riding out torrential El Niño storms and freezing winds from her precarious 8-by-8-foot plywood perch, she conducted radio interviews via solar-powered cell phone, and hosted reporters and photographers willing to make the two-hour climb to her rustic penthouse. On Earth Day in 1999, Joan Baez and Bonnie Raitt even dropped by. Baez called the visit ‘one of the most remarkable experiences of my life.’
Her protest worked: Luna was spared the chainsaw (though nearby redwoods continue to be cut). When Hill finally came down, wobbly kneed and ecstatic, she said ‘it was so cold and wet this morning, I had to laugh, because I was so thankful that I don’t have to sit through another winter.’”
Julia is not just an activist. She is also a profound philosopher and a healer who is important to listen to now as the country faces such sharp divisions over a variety of issues that many foresee a Civil War. In this video, Julia calls for unity even with those who see us as an “enemy”. For example, even as loggers initially labeled her derisively, she refused to label them. She says it’s important to disagree agreeably.
Julia Butterfly Hill is known for climbing a 1,000-year-old redwood tree in 1997 when she was 23 years old, and remaining there without touching the ground for two years, as part of a successful effort to call worldwide attention to the destruction of California’s ancient redwoods. Since then, she has addressed the U.N., lobbied Congress, and continued to stand on the front lines of environmental and social justice issues all over the world. She is the author of The Legacy of Luna: The Story of a Tree, a Woman and the Struggle to Save the Redwoods and One Makes the Difference: Inspiring Actions That Change Our World.
“Julia Butterfly Hill ascended Luna—a giant 1,500-year-old redwood tree near Stafford, California—in December 1997. She lived in Luna for 738 days, until finally descending in December 1999 when an agreement was made with Pacific Lumber Company that protected Luna and a 200-foot buffer zone surrounding the tree.
Julia Butterfly Hill was interviewed on June 23, 2021, by Trees Foundation’s Director of Development and Outreach, Kerry Reynolds. The transcription has been edited for length. You can watch the full 27-minute interview at https://youtu.be/WPnwqKtjLgs….
“While I was in Luna, I learned that every issue we’re facing is the symptom, and the disease is the disease of disconnect. When we’re disconnected from the Earth and we’re disconnecting from each other, we make choices and don’t realize how it’s truly impacting all of us, and that means all the beings, everything, and the future generations. I wanted to try and help weave that together for people, that if…we’re working on the symptoms if we don’t work also at the disease, we’ll never be able to get to the healing that our world and our planet needs…. If the disease is the disease of disconnect, then the healing is all the ways that we can, and do, connect.”
About the Author
Neenah Payne writes for Activist Post and Natural Blaze
Riding an e-Bike Legally in NYC
All over the world, the urban population is growing at an alarming pace. In several countries, this growth has concentrated most of the population in very large cities. This phenomenon occurs in developing and developed countries alike. In the United States, New York City (NYC) is one example of such megalopolises.
A megalopolis like NYC faces many challenges. One of the most complicated problems is urban transportation. Because of the size of the city, many New Yorkers spend a lot of time commuting to work, school, or other places. While public transportation can partly alleviate the problem, it has not been enough to tackle the problem in New York City.
In this scenario, micromobility solutions have emerged as effective alternatives to replace some of the two million cars existing in NYC. The said micromobility solutions refer to lightweight vehicles that are operated by just one person. Some examples of micromobility vehicles are electric scooters, electric bicycles, and mopeds.
Regulation Is Necessary
Micromobility vehicles can solve the last-mile problem in urban transportation. They can replace car trips in many situations. For commuters, it is much more comfortable and faster to go to work on an electric bike than to sit for a long time in the middle of a traffic jam. However, New York City still has a car-centric infrastructure. Therefore, regulation is mandatory to ensure the safe coexistence between micromobility vehicles and cars in urban areas.
Regulation is also needed to ensure the safety of the operators of micromobility vehicles and pedestrians. Fortunately, the authorities of the ‘Big Apple’ have already produced several laws that regulate the use of micromobility vehicles. Let’s review the legal requirements to ride micromobility ebike in NYC, emphasizing the use of electric bikes.
Legal Requirements to Ride Electric Scooters in New York City
To operate an electric scooter in NYC, you have to be at least 16 years old. Your vehicle should comply with the legal definition of an e-scooter in the state of New York: a vehicle with handlebars, a floorboard or seat, and an electric motor that provides motion power.
The maximum allowed speed for scooters in NYC is 15 mph. You should ride your e-scooter on roads and streets with a maximum speed limit of 30 mph. On roads with bike lanes, you should use those lanes to ride your e-scooter. The use of safety helmets is recommended. For riders younger than 18 years old, the use of a helmet is mandatory.
Legal Requirements to Ride Electric Bicycles in New York City
Electric bicycles are allowed in the streets of NYC. However, to ride legally, your e-bike should comply with the definition adopted by the state of New York: a bike not wider than 36” powered by an electric motor of a maximum of 750 Watts with fully functional pedals. Moreover, to simplify the regulation, the state of New York has adopted the following classification:
· Class 1. Electric bicycles with only pedal assistance and a maximum speed of 20 mph.
· Class 2. Electric bicycles with pedal assistance, a throttle, and a maximum speed of 20 mph.
· Class 3. Electric bicycles with pedal assistance, a throttle, and a maximum speed of 25 mph.
In New York City, you can ride any e-bike that belongs to one of the three classes above. However, you should be at least 16 years old to operate an e-bike in this city. The good news is that you don’t need a driver’s license. You don’t need to register your electric bike either.
You can ride your electric bike on roads and streets with a maximum speed limit of 30 mph. Also, you can ride your e-bike in any bicycle lane in the city. The use of a safety helmet to ride an e-bike is strongly recommended. It is mandatory for all e-bike riders under 18 years old. Delivery cyclists riding a Class 1 or Class 2 e-bike have to wear a helmet too. All riders operating a Class 3 e-bike have to wear a helmet. Insurance is not required by law if you ride an electric bike.
Protect The Earth By Adopting These 4 Simple Habits
The Earth is the only planet that we know of, sustains life. Over the centuries the human race has done nothing but damage mother nature. We have polluted the atmosphere with burning fuel, filled the land with waste that is not degrading any time soon and we have not even spare water bodies. Resultantly, the Earth is depleting from its natural resources. Time is not far when we will struggle for necessities like clean water to drink, clean air to breathe, and land to live on. It is time that we take concrete steps to protect the Earth from further damage. Here are four simple habits that can make a huge difference in the environment. These habits can be adopted individually and as a society.
1. Manage Your Waste
Waste materials from houses and industries are the biggest cause of air and land pollution. Now is the time that you start managing your waste. Reduce the amount going to the garbage as much as possible. Individually, you can reduce your kitchen waste by adopting methods of composting. Try growing a home garden. You can use your peels of fruits and vegetables as fertilizers. On an industrial scale, businesses should opt for ombp solutions. Try partnership with other businesses that can use your by-products as their raw material. This way, industries will dump fewer waste materials into water bodies and land.
2. Go Organic
Reduce spendings on the packaged food that is available fresh in the market. For instance, instead of buying tomato purees, buy fresh tomatoes from the farmer’s market. Agricultural businesses should adopt more environment-friendly practices. Instead of using chemical fertilizers, use organic and natural options. Use fewer sprays to reduce soil contamination. Science surely has increased the yield of agricultural products but at the cost of the Earth’s environment.
3. Support Green Energy
Coal is the cheapest source of energy available till now. It is also by far the most polluting substance on the Earth. Try adopting the habit of supporting clean green energy. Invest in hybrid cars instead of diesel engines. Try getting a solar system for electricity. Governments should encourage people to go for green energy options, such as solar panels and windmills. Industries should shift their energy consumption from coal to renewable energy resources.
4. Plant A Tree
Planting a tree might seem like a needle in a haystack. But let me assure you, it is the best gift you can give to the planet Earth. It has become a trend to burn candles to show solidarity with the innocents. How great an idea it would be to plant a tree instead. Trees are the lungs of the Earth. Deforestation has deprived her of her lungs. As a society, we can plant trees in our homes, in the parks, near offices and malls, and on the road dividers. After all, someone has to filter out all the polluting gases we are introducing into the air.
4 Things to Look Out for When Buying Eco Friendly Flooring
Global warming is becoming a significant problem across the world. With experts warning that the damage could become irreversible, people are now looking at ways to reduce their carbon footprint.
One way to ensure you are doing your part for the environment is to make sure you are choosing eco-friendly products. A lot of common products have eco-friendly options, including flooring. Here, top UK retailer Stories Flooring, shares 4 things you should look out for when buying eco-friendly flooring.
1. Is it sustainably sourced?
Wood is a renewable material, making solid and engineered wood floors a great eco-friendly choice. However, not all manufacturers produce products from sustainable sources.
You can find out whether the floor you are considering has been sustainably sourced by researching the manufacturer. For example, leading flooring brand Kahrs, clearly highlights its environmentally friendly practices on its website. By selecting brands that focus on sustainability, you can ensure you are doing your part for the environment.
2. Choose FSC certified wood
Another tip when you’re buying a wood floor is to choose one that is FSC certified. FSC stands for the Forest Stewardship Council. The body certifies forests throughout the globe, ensuring they meet strict social and environmental standards.
Floors that are FSC certified have been taken from sustainable forests and made with environmentally friendly processes.
3. Is it recyclable?
Whichever type of floor you are looking into, check whether it is recyclable. This could mean that the floor has been made with recycled materials, or it can be recycled at the end of its lifespan.
Both options are great for the environment. They cut back the amount of new materials required, saving on production emissions. Retailers will typically tell you which floors have been recycled in their product descriptions.
4. How is it installed?
If you want to lower your carbon footprint when purchasing a new floor, the installation process is something else to consider. If you need to use adhesives, for example, this can increase emissions released during installation. For this reason, click or tongue and groove installation systems tend to be the more environmentally-friendly choice.
These are the 4 main things to focus on when you’re looking for eco-friendly flooring. Stories Flooring is one retailer making eco-friendly floors a priority. The company is actively working alongside leading brands to offer the most sustainable floors on the market.
Is Your Garden Really Organic?
We’ve all heard the term organic gardening, it sounds catchy and has an eco-friendly ring to it. But not even some experienced gardeners really understand what this entails. It is commonly thought that a garden can be called organic if no toxic chemicals are involved. Although this is true, it is only one of many aspects of organic gardening that we have yet to cover.
Every garden starts with soil – the richer in nutrients, the better. If your garden is full of fertile black soil, you already have a great head start! But you must keep in mind that soil is something that needs to be sustained. Many things can ruin or contaminate soil for years to come, one of them being the plants themselves. Some crops may lead to land depletion or loss of fertility.
Say No To Toxins
The main cause of soil contamination is, of course, all the pesticides that are being used to get rid of unwanted pests in the garden. While pesticides and insecticides protect the plants, most of the time store-bought ones cause more harm than good. All pesticides contain harmful chemicals not only to humans but to the ecosystem as a whole. They leak into the soil, cling onto fruits and vegetables that will later be consumed, and they can even be dangerous to wildlife or pets. Instead of risking contamination, why not go for a truly eco-friendly option and make your own pesticide out of plants or household items. By following a step-by-step tutorial, you can not only save your plants but a lot of money, too. Natural sprays do the job just as well as store-bought, but without any negative impact on the soil.
Don’t Let Your Waste Go To Waste!
Natural fertilizers like manure or eggshells are also a great way to go. Instead of throwing out organic wastelike coffee grounds or vegetable peels, try putting them in the soil and see how beneficial this can be for the garden. Sustainability should always be a priority and this way you can kill two birds with one stone by also lowering the amount of waste that you produce.
Biodiversity Is In
When we think of the perfect yard, most people imagine freshly mowed and perfectly cut grass behind a white picket fence, where every single blade of grass is no different from the other. To some, this may seem ideal, but it’s frankly speaking, boring and kills off any chance of biodiversity. What is biodiversity, and why is it so important to have in our yards and gardens? It refers to all varieties of life and can encompass whole ecosystems. In other words, this term includes both flora and fauna: the trees and bushes, flowers and plants that are either planted or grow by themselves, the bees that pollinate flowers, and even the tiniest of bugs that also contribute to the environment they live in. All of these life forms naturally coexist and even create symbioses.
Biodiversity has great potential and is slowly becoming a new trend. Perhaps, in 10-20 years, it will become a widespread standard that will let nature take control and manifest in all its glory. This is not only beneficial for the ecology but also much easier to maintain. It saves lots of time and effort, so you have more time enjoying nature instead of trying to “fix” it.
Reap What You Sow
Even if you are an experienced gardener with a green thumb, some plants can really be “out of place”. Think about what kinds of plants will adapt and thrive in the particular soil and climate conditions when growing from seeds or replanting. The main factors include moisture, amount of sunlight, and changes in temperature year-round. If you live in an area where droughts often occur, consider plants like lavender, Verbascum, and thyme. If your area is high in moisture and has wet, soggy soil, canna, and Siberian irises are a good choice. Some plants need more care than others, so if you aren’t ready to make a commitment – don’t worry! You have plenty of options to choose from. Even air plants that thrive without water or soil can become a wonderful bonus to your garden.
Our ancestors knew quite a lot about agriculture, and some of these methods are used until now. Native Americans came up with a very effective technique to grow different cultures together in a way that they can benefit each other. It is known as the Sister Method, where corn, beans, and squash are planted in one bed. The corn acts as a pole for the beans to “climb on” and support them as they grow, and the squash lies closer to the ground, protecting the beans and corn from pests with its prickly leaves and keeping the soil damp and shady. Another ancient technique known as the Three Field method can be very useful when dealing with larger fields of crops. One field was sowed with seeds, the second had fully grown crops that were ready to harvest, and the third field was “resting” after the harvest, which prevented exploitation of the soil.
Accessorize Your Garden
Make your garden even closer to nature by adding some small details like bird feeders, birdbath fountains, or even a pond. It will liven up the area and attract all sorts of wildlife like squirrels, birds, and frogs and make them feel welcome in your garden. This is great if you enjoy birdwatching or if you like animals in general. Having a pond full of fish and beautiful water lilies in your garden can be quite calming.
Knowing all the above-mentioned facts and tips, you can start contributing to the environment. To live in harmony, we must give as much as we take, and truly understand the importance of every single form of life. We are all part of biodiversity, and we, as humans, should make the conscious choice of preserving the resources that we have. Even something as small as a garden can already have a great impact.
Michael Brauer is a blog author at Summerhouse24.co.uk. He deals with the topics of house building and gardening and writes his articles about them in an accessible form for a wide audience.
Incredibly Beautiful Floating Flower Garden is ALIVE with 13,000 Orchids that Move as You Approach (MUST WATCH)
A three-dimensional mass of floating flowers created by teamLab in Japan has been moving visitors not only with its technological magic but with its overwhelming natural beauty.
In this work called “Flowers and I are of the Same Root, the Garden and I are One,” people immerse themselves in the flowers, becoming one with the garden, says teamLab.
Open since July, the museum space is scented by the fragrance of 13,000 living orchids suspended from near-invisible wires.
They’re able to survive in mid-air because orchids are able to grow without soil, by absorbing water from the air. In fact, all the diverse orchid species used here evolved to live on rocks and trees where other plants could not survive—and in the exhibit, they growing and blooming with each passing day.
The artwork space seems to be completely filled with flowers (especially because of the mirrored floor), but the blossoms slowly rise to the ceiling whenever people approach, opening spaces previously concealed.
The Schumann Resonance And Gaia: Connection Between The Brain And The Planet
Beyond the “subtle” energies, almost spiritual or astral, there is a dimension of energies that are well known and typified by academic science. We speak of forces of an electromagnetic nature, radiation fields, terrestrial magnetism, cosmic radiation, etc. The Schumann resonance falls on this spectrum.
Named after the theoretical physicist who proposed and proved them, Winifred Schumann (1880-1974), it consists of a band of ELF (“Extremely Low Frequencies”) peaks of approximately 7.83 Hz, that surrounds the Earth in the band between the ground and the ionosphere as the “background” of the electromagnetic field of the planet.
Before continuing, we must discriminate some conceptual errors, as they have been vulgarized in this way:
One, that at the time of its discovery that given value was “approximate” —that is, there are zones and times of fluctuation. For example, the weather: an increase in the number of electrical storms in the world increases that frequency, conversely, it decreases.
Second, it is stated that today it is 12 Hz, which is also variable.
Third (and this is the biggest error) that this means that the Earth’s day has accelerated, with which today it would be 16 hours. Gross mistake because the electromagnetic frequency of these waves has nothing to do with the speed of the Earth’s rotation — and in that sense, I can say that I have observed that people who repeat this mistake in good faith lack, in general, minimal training or intellectual understanding technical or scientific.
This is how it would be presented:
But let us return to the starting point of the «Schumann resonance» and ask ourselves why the interest that the subject has aroused among many people, generally reluctant to the aseptic academic field, motivating them to internalize and – as we have pointed out – sometimes echoing conclusions and proposals wrong (although I wonder if this “misinformation” was not precisely indirectly stimulated by intelligence services in order to make a fool of the outsider investigators of the System and, consequently, devalue the results they had obtained).
And why such an inordinate interest of that public for this phenomenon? Because different authors have pointed out that it would have a direct link with the subtle nature of the human being. The resonance would have the same frequency as the Alpha state produced by the human brain, with which they suppose that its increase or increase would translate to increasing the frequencies of the same and this would be evidence of the “quantum leap” of humanity, that is, your leap forward in the opening of consciousness.
This is where we should point out some details.
It is true that Analogy is one of the fundamental and subtle principles of the spiritualistic understanding of the Universe. Although the academics will argue that it is a fallacy, known as ergo propter hoc, that is to say ‘with this and therefore because of this, experimental observation constantly confirms it.
However, that the human being has a cerebral behavior that has the same range as an ELF behavior of the planet where he lives and is interpreted as that the Schumann resonance acts on and modifies the electrochemical activity of the brain, it would be as absurd as to maintain that the activity Electrochemistry modifies the ELF of the planet since it ignores a Fundamental Law of the Universe: the Principle of Correspondence.
This phenomenon is named in honor of Winfried Otto Schumann (1888-1974), who mathematically predicted its existence in 1952, despite being observed for the first time by Nikola Tesla and forming the basis of his scheme for power transmission and communications. wireless.
That is to say, it is aligned with that principle (the Microcosmic in the Macrocosmic and the Macrocosmic in the Microcosmic), yes, but we insist on remembering that the principle of Correspondence is so-called because one fact corresponds to another, but that does not mean that one of them produces the other.
I urge the reader who has just arrived at these issues, perhaps to stop here and turn to deepen that concept that – I am convinced – is “liberating” in terms of open-mindedness to understand not only what we are developing here but also the entire efficacy of Esotericism itself.
That said, let’s get back to what we are dealing with. Because we must highlight another fact: the cerebral rhythm that we know as Alpha (inducer of what we perceive with a state of deep myo-relaxation, meditation, the state of mind Ku when saying Zen, etc.) is not 7.8 (let’s round-up: 8) cycles per second: it is between 8 and 12 c / sec. And when the brain frequency changes — be it up or down — it ceases to be one type of brain wave category to transform into another that is accompanied by a different psychic picture (not the same and improved).
But there is another detail to take into account: these brain frequencies that we are talking about are, as we said, electrochemical, and although they act on the electromagnetic nature of human nature, they constitute just one more variable.
On the other hand, the Schumann resonance is pure and exclusively electromagnetic, so that it is because of that parity, that correspondence, that we must look for effects that may interest us. With which we are accepting that there is undoubtedly a relationship between Schumann’s discovery and human nature, but such a link would perhaps not be psychic but electromagnetic.
In this sense, any alteration of this ELF field can have an impact first in biology, in the greater or lesser intensity of the auric field – understood as the surplus part of the physical body of its “bioplasmic egg” or “bioenergetic” -. Consequently, it impacts (harmonizes or disharmonizes) electromagnetically (and in a subtle phase, bio energetically).
It is here where the knowledge and practice of Bioenergetics —in the paradigm of Wilhelm Reich and his disciple Alexander Lowen— shows its importance since such exercises are designed to promote auric balance as a consequence of electromagnetic balance.
Also and from this correspondence it is quite obvious that any significant alteration of the Schumann resonance on a planetary level will result in an alteration of our own electromagnetic fields, and the abuse of the Internet and WiFi, the proximity of power lines and public transformers, heavy machinery in constant operation will be, precisely, factors that will disturb us.
Without going with the conspiracy of putting on hats made of aluminum foil while we walk through life, he points out the importance of applying the teachings of Radionics since they act, precisely at that level, although in a very limited range, restricted to the person or the home where it applies. Inevitably, I will explain in an immediate work some of the options of making Radionics play in our favor, but what we want here is to draw attention to the fact that the increase in disturbances in the Schumann field translate into alterations of our electromagnetic fields and they are also behind certain illnesses, interpersonal conflicts and so on.
So the “parapsychological harmonization” we are insisting on here must also include “radionic harmonizations” or “electromagnetic harmonizations” if you prefer to call them that.
But the “Schumann field” (as I will call it from now on) has a very interesting aspect about all of us and in debt to that principle of Correspondence of which we spoke: that in so far as it is an electromagnetic field – or, better still, electromagnetic pulses on a greater “field” also electromagnetic but at the same time, corresponding to the human electromagnetic field.
Gaia, which we understand as the “consciousness” of the Earth may well be a fact, as well as that our natural parapsychological disposition allows us to “contact”, “tune in”, “empathize” (call it whatever you wish) with it.
What then we must ask ourselves here is: how many “spiritual or extraterrestrial contacts”, how many channelings will be nothing more than the misinterpretation of Gaia speaking to us at the episodic moments that the Schumann field “corresponds” to a significant (but not absolute) number of humans?
I will step into the void and propose my suspicion: that the “Schumann resonant field” and the “Akashic Records” are the same. Or also, that the “Schumann field” and the backup of the Collective Unconscious are the same. What to think about the need for human physiology for an extra-cerebral “information repository” and for it to be that Schumann field? (We will not discuss here what is a proven fact that bothers neuroscientists: the brain does not have the capacity to store the information that an average person accumulates not only in their entire life but simply in the first forty years of it).
I am not necessarily thinking of a conscious and autonomous Gaia that “speaks” to us, but rather that many phenomena that we perceive (and make the mistake of interpreting literally, without even going through the reflection of its symbolic nature) represent how our unconscious rationalizes the impulses of the Reality of that Gaia. And here we must return to what we understand by Reality.
Recent scientific studies suggest that consciousness is physically integrated, causally active information encoded in a global electromagnetic field of the brain.
It is now more than clear that it is not That “that is seen and touched.” What I postulate is that Reality – thus, with capital letters – is greater, transcendent to everyday “reality”, since it is limited to what we can not so much “perceive” but rather “understand”, so that everything that transcends the reality paradigm of an individual would be perceived, yes, but misinterpreted in its decoding.
Otherwise, I say: whoever “empathizes” with the Schumann field consciously accesses the “information.” Then if you “believe” (and this is quite a topic: pre-existing beliefs that distort understanding – not perception – of Reality) that it is some ESP, past life regression, or reading of akhásic records is just one (respectable ) personal belief that at the end of the day the nature of the practical result you get does not change.
Why do we suspect that the Schumann field accumulates information?
Because in it there are not only those ELFs (or, rather, that set of ELFs are in turn interacting with other electromagnetic fields). As we know, radio broadcasts need two types of waves: the one we call “carrier” and the “modulator” (as in commercial AM stations). The “carrier” is the “base” emission that is then affected (modulated) by another signal, causing the first to carry the second. The carrier is a range, the modulator is information. In analogy to this, the Schumann field may be the “carrier” where our unconscious psyche “mounts” the information.
What then can be practical applications of this knowledge? Let’s see:
A) In everyday life
That a person can enter Alpha at a time of low Schumann activity (there are sites on the Web that give access to updated recordings of the resonance and vice versa: the Schumann sound induces the Alpha state), that is, when it is closest at 7.83 Hz, it would allow him access to the information both stored in it – according to the theory that we have presented – and to use it as a “carrier” of his psychic energy, manifesting this in a wide range of parapsychological phenomenology (preferably towards that which exists predisposition in the individual, predisposition towards one or another phenomenon that is easily discriminated with a simple ESP evaluation with Zenner charts).
In another sense, the variations of the Schumann field, in turn, can act (blocking or exacerbating, depending on the case) in the “Dragon veins”, the energetic lattices of the Earth itself that we know as the “Hartmann Network” and “Lines of Curry ”, about which we will talk in another work.
B) In spiritual Knowledge
Being then a “bell” or “resonance box” of the Collective Unconscious, millenary concepts such as “kosmocrator”, “planetary genius” and, of course, “egregor” are understood, since this field would become the so-called “plastic mediator” well known among esotericists.
Indeed, the “plastic mediator” has been called that which allows the “psychic” to materialize as the “physical.”
To be consistent with esoteric teachings, how can an idea, however intense, “jump” the abyss of Reality to make itself tangible? (As the spiritualist currents teach in general and very particularly as proposed by the Principle of Mentalism). Such would then be “archetypal images” that act on, or for the human being, when the disposition of his paradigm allows him to include them in his Reality, for example, when in meditation we accept without questioning and without surprise the most bizarre manifestations that may appear to us.
Let’s stop for a moment at this point. Almost all meditators will agree with me in what I have just stated: in the meditative state we perceive (or occur) manifestations that, beyond their nature, purpose, or “message”, in the normal waking state (that is, in the normal state). Brain Beta) we would qualify as strange and we would seek to “rationalize” with conventional explanations (such as saying “hallucinations” believing that we explain it that way when the word “hallucination” is only a label that names the phenomenon but does not explain it, but in that state, we accept naturally. That is, we “internalize”, which is misleading because, with the same argument, we can affirm that our psyche is the one that is subsumed in the “Schumann field.” I will say more:
In general, esoteric authors have assumed that the “plastic mediator” cited is the astral plane. The point is that there still remains a remarkable difference of nature between the “mental” and the “astral.” It is there when we can propose that the “Schumann field” is that mediator between the psychic and the astral, and the latter (the astral) in turn mediator with the physical. And extrapolating, we may well ask ourselves if that “field” in turn is not a “level”, “plane” or “limbo” where certain entities of an intermediate nature remain.
Finally, I will comment on the aforementioned fact that the HAARP Project has been deactivated. One of two possibilities: either it was a failure because they did not achieve the purpose (presumably, to impact on the collective unconscious of the masses through a «social engineering 2.0» that could consist of «modulations» in the information field) or, by the On the contrary, they are committed to strategies with a better cost-benefit ratio.
The “world’s largest” factory-built solely for the purpose of drawing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it, has just come online in Iceland.
Built-in the geothermal park in Hellisheidi, the company hopes this is merely a stepping stone necessary to scale up the model by a factor of 80, and thereby remove millions of tons of CO2 by the end of the decade.
As direct a climate solution as there could be, the Orca factory, just one of a number of climate change solutions offered by the Icelandic firm Carbfix, takes CO2 from the air before separating the carbon from the oxygen, mixing it with water and sending it deep underground into basalt rock formations where it mineralizes.
With 16 locations recycling CO2, Climeworks, the Swiss company which provided Orca with the CO2 intake fans, is extremely excited to have participated in a project that will permanently remove carbon, rather than just recycling it. They say the green technology can be reproduced easily, and to scale, anywhere there is renewable energy and storage available. Orca was built adjacent to a local geothermal power plant, so it runs fully on renewable energy.
The company says it can pull 4,000 tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere every year, the equivalent of taking 870 cars off the road. On its own, it’s a small impact for the $10-15 million it takes to build, but as companies are increasingly pressured to provide carbon offsets for their operations, the technology offers a huge appeal if costs come down and production is boosted.
For example, offsetting emissions by planting trees is great, but it takes 50 years for a tree to gather enough CO2 to actually sequester it. If the tree dies before that period, it’s as if the company did nothing.
Science tells us that we now have fewer than 10 years to reduce the human burden on Earth or trigger tipping points in Earth’s natural systems from which there is no return. Most discussion centers on the climate emergency, but we also have crises related to air, water, soil, species extinction, and more.
We can hold to course with an economy that grows GDP to provide a few with the opportunity to make a killing as they prepare to escape to outer space. Or we can embrace the current opportunity to transition to an ecological civilization, with a living economy dedicated to supporting us all.
A viable human future depends on living with less. Does that mean to sacrifice? Leaving more people behind? Or is this challenge an unprecedented opportunity to achieve a better future for all? The question of how much is enough, the theme of the fall 2021 issue of YES! Magazine, poses a foundational question for our time.
Daily reports on economic indicators such as GDP celebrate increases in consumption and sound alarm bells when consumption declines. Meanwhile, daily news reports tell of one climate-related disaster after another. Rarely, if ever, do we hear serious discussion of the connection between growing GDP and growing environmental disasters.
The question of how much is enough begins an essential conversation. It is one that usually involves exploring what we as individuals can do to limit our consumption. Asking “when is less more?” invites us to look at societal choices over which we have little individual control. In examining these societal level choices, we can see areas on which we can potentially join in a common cause. Let us look at several key areas where less could be more.
Deadly Weapons. Humans have long dreamed of peace, yet we consume enormous amounts of resources for war. A recent study found that the U.S. Department of Defense accounts for an estimated 80% of the federal government’s energy consumption. The defense department is also the world’s single largest institutional consumer of petroleum, which supports the world’s largest collection of guns, tanks, military aircraft, and warships. Though the U.S. military imposed the largest environmental burden of any nation’s military, the U.S. is only one nation among many with large militaries.
The statistic on the defense department’s energy use tells us nothing about the social and environmental costs of producing deadly weapons or the impacts of their use not just by the military, but also by local police, terrorist groups, criminal syndicates, gangs, and armed individuals. It is far past time we learned to live in peace with one another. The production and use of weapons of war is an obvious example of where less would be more.
Mis-/Disinformation. A healthy society needs responsible media to inform us and connect us with each other. Our expanded communications capabilities create an unprecedented potential for us to join in creating an ecological civilization that works for all of life. Tragically, our ever more extraordinary communications capabilities are most often used to manipulate our minds for purposes contrary to our well-being. This includes advertising that promotes wasteful, even harmful consumption, and propaganda to promote socially and environmentally destructive political agendas. These activities provide lucrative employment to support lavish lifestyles for those who serve them. Less would be more.
Financial Speculation. Money is nothing but a number that has no existence outside the human mind. It can be useful as a tool but becomes a threat to life when its only purpose is to accumulate more money. The structures of modern society make it virtually impossible to live without money, which gives enormous power to those who create it and decide how it is used. Honest money is created transparently by public institutions to serve public purposes. But we now allow private bankers and financial gamers to make claims against society’s real wealth without the burden of creating anything of value in return. The Gross World Product (a global GDP) for 2021 is projected to be around $94 trillion. Analysts project that the value of global financial services will reach $26.5 trillion by 2022. Only a small portion of that amount represents essential financial services. The rest should be considered a form of theft, and a primary driver of income inequality and environmentally burdensome, ego-driven displays of extravagance. Less financial manipulation would give us radically increased equality with far less waste.
The Bitcoin Con. Private cyber currencies are a form of counterfeiting. Bitcoin, a cyber-currency favored by global cybercriminals and tax evaders, is an especially costly example. The energy consumed in “mining” Bitcoins equals the energy use of a small country or major city. The related computer facilities contribute to electronic waste and the current global shortage of semiconductor chips. Bitcoin and other cyber currencies have value only because buyers expect the market to bid up the price further, or else they need it to prevent tracking of an illicit transaction.
Global Supply Chains. Until very recently in our history, we organized our economies around the labor and needs of local communities. This facilitated repair, reuse, recycling, and resilience, and allowed communities to work within the capabilities of the Earth’s regenerative systems. But global trade rules first introduced in the 1990s stripped place-based living communities of control of their markets, labor, and other resources, and allowed transnational corporations to consolidate their power without concern for the well-being of workers, customers, and nature. China has become the epicenter of a highly fragile interdependent system of global supply chains involving the massive, environmentally destructive long-distance movement of material goods by sea, land, and air. Less reliance on global supply chains would reduce this burden while helping restore the social and environmental health of local communities.
Short Stay Air Travel. Air travel has helped to bring us together as a global species, but it consumes enormous amounts of time, energy, and other resources for purposes that can often be better served in less socially and environmentally costly ways. The purposes of a great many international business meetings and professional conferences could be better served by sharing information electronically, including with video conferencing. In terms of vacation travel, a stay in a nearby resort often better serves the need for restful time off in a beautiful relaxing environment. Visits to destinations on your bucket list for purposes of bragging rights commonly overwhelm the destination to give you little more than a selfie in a crowd. When it comes to travel, less can be much more.
Auto-Dependent Cities. Yet another example relates to our dependence on cars. My wife, Fran, and I lived in New York City from 1992 to 1998. It was the only time in our adult lives that we had no car. Everything we needed or wanted was within walking distance or reachable by rapid public transit. We loved this healthy and friendly way of getting around. Designing every city to make it easier to walk, bike, or take public transit for daily trips could remove a significant human burden on Earth while improving life for everyone. A growing number of major cities are taking steps to become less car-dependent. Regarding car travel, less can be more.
Why do we have so many wasteful sources of consumption? Culturally, it stems from excessive individualism, and societally it stems from using money rather than healthy living as our standard of economic performance. These two forces spur the wasteful consumption that manifests in nearly every aspect of our lives.
Disruptions in our lives caused by the COVID pandemic gave us a wake-up call that both highlighted our human vulnerability and interdependence, and an economy that rewards harmful behavior and inadequately compensates those doing the most important work.
As we learn to think and act as an interdependent global species, we must look critically at all the forms of consumption that could be eliminated to the ultimate benefit of all. Such an examination is needed if we are to transition to an ecological civilization. I elaborate on the concept in my white paper, Ecological Civilization: From Emergency to Emergence, prepared for the Club of Rome’s discussions on a new economics for a new civilization.
We face a defining choice. We can hold to course with an economy that grows GDP to provide a few with the opportunity to make a killing as they prepare to escape to outer space. Or we can embrace the current opportunity to transition to ecological civilization, with a living economy dedicated to supporting us all in making a secure and fulfilling living on a thriving living Earth.
Awakening to the reality that we cannot eat money and there are no winners on a dead Earth points us to the latter as the clearly better choice
This article was written for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Soil scientist E. Britt Moore drives home the foundational nature of the soil to his undergraduate students with an etymology lesson. Humans, he tells them, comes from the Latin humus, or soil. Adam is from the Hebrew adamah, meaning ground. Regardless of whether you believe God creating the first human from clay is mythology, says Moore, “societies before us understood an intimate connection between people and soil.”
In its 400-year history, the United States has largely severed this relationship. From the beginning, the U.S. agricultural economy has been based on the exploitation of the land and of people of color, and modern farm practices treat soil as an extractive resource. Centuries of institutionalized discrimination have resulted in soils expertise being seen not as a common heritage for all people but as specialized knowledge belonging to a certain class: landowners, farmers, and researchers—all predominately white. Meanwhile, many communities of color, both urban and rural, live on the ground that is contaminated and depleted.
Today’s systems of exploiting the soil were developed alongside systems of human exploitation and oppression; to address one, we must address both—and that starts with the soil.
Even those aiming to address these problems by improving soil health follow the same pattern.
“The demographics of the people on the front lines fighting for justice are very different than the demographics of the people researching [regenerative agriculture],” Moore observes.
The big names in regenerative agriculture are white, and the movement has faced criticism for not acknowledging the roots of its knowledge base in Indigenous and Black agricultural practices. At the same time, much racial equity and environmental justice work tend to be far removed from considerations of landscape-scale ecology. Moore is part of a growing movement of scientists, researchers, farmers, and community leaders working to bridge this gap.
Today’s systems of exploiting the soil were developed alongside systems of human exploitation and oppression; to address one, we must address both—and that starts with the soil.
Parallel Histories of Exploitation
The outlines of the development of U.S. agriculture are familiar: white colonial governments took land from Indigenous peoples through massacres, broken treaties, and outright land theft. Backed by international business interests, they built a tremendously profitable economy on the land-based on free labor made possible by the legal enslavement of kidnapped Africans and their descendants.
Across what is now the Midwestern farm belt, the 1862 Homestead Act promised parcels of land to white settlers if they farmed it using the production-oriented methods of the day: plowing up the deep prairie and planting shallow-rooted annual crops. While most of the parcels went to speculators and others with capital rather than to working farmers, the land was nonetheless effectively redistributed to white ownership. Meanwhile, the post-Civil War order popularized as “40 acres and a mule,” granting land to formerly enslaved people, was overturned within a year. Subsequent U.S. agriculture policy has played out in similar ways, consistently benefiting white farmers, larger-scale operations, and, ultimately, corporate interests. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has admitted to decades of discrimination against Black farmers and other farmers of color.
On the ground, the 1860s “sod-busting,” as plowing the prairie became known, destroyed millions of acres of deep-rooted tall grasslands and forests. The native prairie was a complex above- and belowground ecosystem, supported by a web of life from microbes to bison and stewarded for millennia by Indigenous communities. As annual grain crops replaced perennial prairie and seasonal plowing replaced the movement of bison grazing tall grass, some of the richest soil in the world was exposed, dried to dust, and blew as far as New York City. In response to the Dust Bowl, New Deal-era farm policy prioritized conservation measures, but priorities changed just a few decades later, and farmers were again encouraged to plant “fencerow to fencerow.”
Environmentally, the ongoing focus on producing for maximum yield has been a disastrous legacy.
The legacy of these parallel histories is, at the societal level, an agricultural landscape that is today over 95% white, and where 5% of farms account for 75% of all farm sales. Regardless of actual demographics, rural has become nearly synonymous with white, while urban is too often used as a dog whistle to mean communities of color.
Environmentally, the ongoing focus on producing for maximum yield has been a disastrous legacy. Established corporate supply chains, demand for livestock feed, and government support for corn and soybeans have led these two annual grains to dominate the rural landscape, despite persistent oversupply. The crops are dependent on chemical fertilizers and pesticides and grown in a way that leaves the ground bare for two-thirds of the year. Livestock, formerly raised alongside field crops, are grown out in large confinement barns. Agricultural chemicals and large concentrations of manure cause persistent challenges with nitrate pollution of waterways and drinking water. Without perennial roots or year-round grass cover, the soil becomes dry and unstable, likely to blow away or wash into lakes, streams, and groundwater, harming ecosystems and human health.
The Benefits of Continuous Living Cover
The environmental crises of modern agriculture—a catastrophic loss of soil and biodiversity, water pollution, contribution to climate change, and much more—have become so extreme that some are tempted to focus exclusively on that aspect of U.S. agriculture’s exploitative legacy. But others across the Upper Midwest and beyond are finding the importance of addressing agriculture’s harms to society and the earth together, inspired by a systems-based approach centered around continuous living cover (CLC).
CLC is a set of regenerative agriculture practices whose basic tenet is keeping soil covered with living matter and living roots in the ground at all times, making it better able to absorb and retain water, limit runoff, and retain nutrients. CLC practices allow farmers to reduce or eliminate chemical input use, as the increased biodiversity builds soil fertility and natural pest resistance. Diversification of crops and farm products can lead to new marketing opportunities. Ultimately, this can lead to additional community economic benefits with a focus on local and regional supply chains that grow to meet new processing and product development opportunities.
There are many different ways that farmers and landowners can approach CLC to meet their needs and the needs of the land. CLC options include harvested or unharvested winter or year-round cover crops such as camelina winter oilseed, new perennial grain crops like Kernza® perennial grain, agroforestry approaches including orchard trees or windbreaks, and integration of livestock.
A Systems Approach with Broad Impact
Many farmers who adopt a CLC approach find that it can be quickly life-changing. Central Illinois farmers Kathy and Rick Kaesebier farmed conventional corn and soybeans for 40 years until some unusual soil problems led them to take a soil health course. An experiment with 20 acres of cover crops quickly expanded as they learned about soil ecology. Five years later, they have cover crops planted on every possible acre of the 600 that they farm and they have diversified their operation to include wheat, a multispecies cover crop, cattle, Katahdin sheep, layer hens, and honeybees.
“We’ve increased our cow numbers each year,” Kathy writes in an email. Grazing the multispecies cover crop currently supports 16 heads, and there is a strong local demand for beef. After a lifetime of field crops, she loves working with livestock too, joking, “I’d have 100 sheep if I could just get Rick to agree.”
Not all farmers practicing CLC cropping make such a dramatic shift, but the whole farm system approach can make it more likely. In contrast with the modern agricultural mindset of finding a discrete solution for a discrete problem, the CLC approach recognizes that the farm is a complex ecosystem: start tugging on one thread, and suddenly you may have to re-knit the whole sweater—or rethink your whole crop plan, now based around 100 sheep.
For Britt Moore, this is the appeal of CLC. Moore, who is beginning a position at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington after completing his Ph.D. in soil physics at Iowa State University, never expected to devote his life to the soil. Growing up Black on the South Side of Chicago, he attended an agriculture science magnet school, which got him interested in the natural world. After studying agroecology and ecosystems interactions in college, he was examining the benefits of cover crops for his Master’s degree when he realized that the soil was more interesting than the plants—and that the way they interacted was the most interesting of all.
“It was a jump from ecosystems to systems in general—and how soil is foundational to cultural, social, and economic systems,” he says of his engagement with CLC systems.
The interconnection doesn’t stop at the farm gate.
“You can’t talk about social justice without talking about soil,” he says, giving the example of people of color disproportionately living in areas with contaminated soils. The pollution alone is harmful, but there is another level of impact when it comes to food security: many urban residents who could most benefit from growing their own food cannot do so without special attention to the soil. They usually do not have the expertise to address it—knowledge about soil isn’t seen as the domain of people of color—and the resources are not available: “There aren’t even the level of detailed soil maps in urban areas as for a farm in Iowa,” Moore says.
Moore was recently one of over two dozen contributors to a white paper published this week by Green Lands Blue Waters examining how a CLC-inspired systems approach can transform the future of agriculture, from soil health to racial justice. (Disclosure: I was also a contributor.) With a view across the farm support network, the paper features examples of long-time and new farmers, agriculture professionals, researchers, and others taking a different approach to their work with both ecosystems and society, and often seeing the two as parts of an interconnected whole.
For some, the approach is not new: Tsyunhehkw^ Farm on the Oneida Nation in Wisconsin has re-established the tribe’s indigenous high-protein white corn and practices intensive rotational grazing with a Shorthorn cattle herd, mimicking the movement of bison on the Great Plains. Farm manager Kyle Wisneski and others have been keeping traditional practices alive on the farm for decades. In the last few years, the tribal government has rapidly expanded the land base under the stewardship of Tsyunhehkw^, as soil contamination on nearby land and pandemic food insecurity brought renewed tribal interest to holistic farm techniques that have worked for generations.
Others are taking a systems approach to grow the CLC knowledge base itself. In recent decades, much agricultural research, even at public institutions, has been funded by private corporations. As a result, research on intensive, input-based methods likely to benefit a corporate funder’s bottom line now far outweighs research on systems-based regenerative agriculture techniques. In Wisconsin, Grassland 2.0, a multistakeholder collaborative focused on transitioning livestock production from grain-based to grass-based, is instead building expertise through collaboration. With a five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, project partners, including farmers, researchers, and business leaders, are creating learning hubs in farm communities around Wisconsin and surrounding states to tap into local knowledge. To understand the system-level change necessary to support farmers converting to intensive grazing, the group is examining everything from farm-level best practices for soil health and biodiversity to developing supply chains with lenders to renegotiating relationships with equipment dealers.
Moore himself points out the critical necessity of expanding who has access to an understanding of the natural world. Before he started his Ph.D., he taught high school science in an under-resourced urban school, where his students had never been asked to think about the connection between food and agriculture.
His own story, he says, of a Black kid from Chicago going into soil science, is all too rare. The rarefication and white-washing of knowledge about the natural world is a loss for everyone. He advocates for significant investment in early agricultural education in urban schools, to equalize who has expertise about the environment we all live in, and to change the face of agricultural professionals in the next generation.
Looking at the last 250+ years of yield-driven U.S. agriculture and the exploitation that has made it possible, Moore says, “We have a system that values a particular set of knowledge—and that’s what it supports and funds.”
To build a different system—one that values healthy soils, biodiversity, clean water, and human capital overexploitation and profit at all costs—we must invest in the knowledge that supports it. The good news is that many people are doing just that.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Siena Chrisman is a Brooklyn-based writer and researcher addressing agriculture policy and social justice. Her work has appeared in Modern Farmer, Edible Brooklyn, Grist, and others, and she is currently working on a book about the 1980s farm crisis. Read more at www.sienachrisman.com.
Human beings strive to be happy. Indeed, many philosophers believe the desire for happiness is what drives most of what we do, whether that’s engaging in pleasurable activities, connecting to other people, or pursuing achievement.
But could the search for personal happiness be a problem when it comes to building a sustainable world? The idea doesn’t seem far-fetched. After all, sustainability means meeting our current needs for a good life without taking away from future generations, and focusing on our own pleasure in the present could have environmental costs in the future. For example, finding bliss in driving a gas-guzzling SUV could contribute to pollution, and finding success in selling products that need to be constantly replaced could create waste.
Yet findings from a new study suggest happiness is not detrimental to sustainability. In fact, they may go hand in hand.
Researchers used surveys from 152 countries to see how happiness was related to sustainability goals and behaviors. To measure happiness, they drew from the World Happiness Report and the World Database of Happiness, both of which provide happiness scores for different countries based on citizen reports on how good they think their life is or how satisfied they are with their life.
First, they found that happier countries consumed more, in general than less happy countries—not necessarily a good sign for sustainability. But, even though they consumed more, happier countries also were better at reaching sustainability goals and recycling.
“In happier countries, people enjoy their lives and consume things, but they consume in a more responsible way,” says lead researcher Yomna Sameer. “It’s not an either/or. Happiness can go hand in hand with sustainability.”
To strengthen these findings, Sameer and her colleagues did a second analysis, dividing countries into high and low happiness categories and controlling for other factors that could skew their results—for example, wealth per capita, democratic or governmental corruption, general social trust, and more. Then, they reanalyzed the relationship between happiness and sustainability.
Again, happier countries met sustainability goals more and recycled more than unhappy countries, even when considering these social and political factors.
“We wanted to make sure that this relationship was not a random thing—that the relationship we believe is happening is really happening,” she says. “And we still found that the happier the country is, the more sustainable and responsible it is.”
This led Sameer to wonder why happier people would act in more sustainable ways. Perhaps happier people feel more grateful for their life and want to take care of what enriches them—their environment and the society around them. Or maybe when people are more depressed (and less happy), they’re more inwardly focused or just don’t have the energy to recycle and do other environmentally sustaining activities.
She doesn’t have the data to explain this connection, suggesting the need for more research. Plus, this is only one study, and it can’t show for sure that happiness leads to sustainability and not the other way around, she says. But, since a country’s level of happiness seems to be tied to other positive outcomes (like more social justice, better-managed commons, and stronger community ties), it’s possible it could also promote sustainability.
The most important thing, says Sameer, is that happiness doesn’t have to be a barrier to sustainability, and this is a counterintuitive finding that people should know about. Otherwise, governments and other messengers may say that sacrificing one’s happiness is necessary to create a more sustainable world, and that could be counterproductive to persuading people to take care of the environment.
“Happy people are not selfish. They don’t only care about their own happiness and refuse to care about others or the environment,” she says. “The more awareness we have about this, the more governments and companies can start talking about sustainability from that perspective.”
Jill Suttie, Psy.D., is Greater Good’s former book review editor and now serves as a staff writer and contributing editor for the magazine. She received her doctorate of psychology from the University of San Francisco in 1998 and was a psychologist in private practice before coming to Greater Good.