Radical Optimism Amidst Cataclysmic Change

How can we stay positive when it seems like the world is falling apart?  Geological evidence of cycles of cataclysmic polar shifts, magnetic field changes, and weather changes suggest we are at the brink of another such change, while world governments appear to be engaged in a war of information and perception.

Earth's north magnetic pole has moved from Canada, through Greenland, and now approaching Siberia.  Millions of years ago, the poles moved, possibly triggering an ice age.  Many ancient legends and stories match the geological magnetic and archeological evidence confirming that massive cataclysmic weather changes have occurred in regular cycles throughout the Earth's history.  Many futurists are seriously considering the possibility that cataclysmic Earth changes might soon be here.  Why are world leaders not yet discussing any of this?

Part of the answer might have something to do with something called Fifth-Generation Warfare, 5GW. James Corbett describes 5G War, with clarification that 5G war is:  “the war of every government against its own population and every international institution against free humanity.”  Most people don't yet even know we're in the midst of a war of information and perception, that is targeting and creating cognitive biases in such stealthy ways that are nearly invisible.  With the idea in mind that warfare has rules, what rule set do you recommend we master for this 5G war?

True Polar Wander

Geologists at Rice University discovered evidence suggesting that Earth’s spin axis was in a different spot millions of years ago, a phenomenon called “true polar wander.”  This change occurred sometime in the past 12 million years, shifting Greenland further up into the Arctic Circle, and possibly contributing to the onset of the last major Ice Age, 3.2 million years ago.

The Earth's tectonic plates of our continents and the ocean floor float and shift atop lower, hotter, layers of magma.  We see signs of the lower, hotter layers through “hotspot” locations, where the magma rises, and initiates volcanic activity.  In the USA, there are hotspots beneath Yellowstone and Hawaii, which are also moving in relation to the Earth's inner core, but not as quickly as the tectonic plates.

When the Earth's tectonic plates move over hotspots, they leave a path with the evidence we can see, such as the remnants of the Pacific Plate's movement over the Hawaiian hotspot being much longer than just the above-water islands that magma flowing up through the volcanoes created.  In fact, the full path is evidenced by 3,600 miles of dormant, underwater volcanoes, stretching from Hawaii to Alaska's Aleutian Islands.

Thanks to studying these larger swaths of hotspot shift in relationship with continental drift, scientists now recognize that when the spin axis of the Earth changes, it would have to change position relative to the hotspots, and not just relative to those constantly moving tectonic plates.  The geologic record shows that the equator has clearly shifted, meaning that the Earth's spin axis has shifted.  Coriolis forces show us where the equator has been, since these forces create winds, push ocean waters north in the northern hemisphere, and south in the southern hemisphere, leading to a deficit of surface water along the equator in the ocean.

The ocean then balances this deficit by bringing equatorial deep water up from the ocean floor, which transports nutrients to the surface, feeding organisms that thrive in equatorial regions, and leave their remains on the equatorial sea floor–providing a clear line of equatorial demarcation for us to study later on.

When we look to see how the Pacific Plate has moved steadily north, we'd expect to find evidence of the past equatorial line of sediment to the north.  But scientists have been surprised to find something unexpected:  the equator was not where we'd expect–and the only way that the equator could move is that the spin axis of the Earth and poles moved.

A second piece of geological evidence came from the Earth's magnetic fields, which are polarized thanks to Earth's molten core.  While it's true that the Earth's magnetic poles are not usually exactly the same as the geographic (spin) poles, they are usually fairly close, so they average out to aligning with the geographic poles over time.  We can see evidence of the history of the Earth's magnetic field and poles in the new crust formed at the ocean floor.  These magnetic signs match the equatorial geographic evidence, showing that there exists a phenomenon called, “True Polar Wander,” where the spin axis of the Earth has shifted locations relative to the surface of our planet.

At some time between 48 and 12 million years ago, the Earth's spin axis and geographic north and south poles were in very different places than they are today.  The north pole was closer to Greenland than it is today, and the south pole shifted similarly to the west.  At some point in time around 12 million years ago, the poles moved to where they are now.  This shift can seriously affect Earth's climate and weather, and may have some relationship with Earth's last ice age, which started sometime around 3.2 million years ago.

When the Next Polar Shift Might Occur

Some futurists mention that some kind of big shift is coming.  This is discussed by the Arlington Institute's Quartet, led by John Peterson and including Gregg Braden, Penny Kelly, and Kingsley Dennis.  The coming shift is also referenced by remote viewers, such as Steven Schwartz, who writes the Schwartz Report, and leads remote viewing projects of the years 2050 and 2060 as possibly happening around the year 2045.  Some observers of space weather, such as Ben Davidson, author of Weatherman's Guide to the Sun, and YouTube creator of the Suspicious Observers channel are expecting a polar shift to occur sometime in the next 20 to 30 years.  It seems likely that the world's government leaders are well aware of this, yet so far, there has been little to no conversation about how some of the changes we are already witnessing may contribute more to climate and weather changes than anything typically discussed.

Instead of hearing about something that the world could collectively be preparing for, it seems that we have instead been guided to focus attention on issues that are far less serious and impactful.  There is almost a sense of being misdirected and distracted, yet there are ever-increasing numbers of people who are coming up with their own questions, and thinking independently of narratives currently being pushed.

We might well ask if all of this information about possible upcoming Earth cataclysm is so well known, why don't our government leaders discuss this with us?  Is it possible that some of them are aware of possible massive disruption, and they might be contributing to disinformation and misinformation?