Corporate Controlled Media

Indeed, there are so many ways that the information age could completely shift the oligarchical collectivism of the power structures of the world in favor of individuals instead of institutions. So, instead of expanding our reach of information – instead of inspiring individuals to dig for truth and research for realness – the institutional powers-that-be are constricting the field of information. This is particularly obvious with recent challenges to net neutrality — neutrality that 87% of average Americans support, but which institutions are nonetheless seeking to destroy. #mainstreammedia #informationage #netneutrality

For decades and even centuries people have been told a great lie and that lie has been handed down by loving parents who didn’t know any better. World leadership in government (and organized religion) have been accelerating this lie every year and we have all been led into a form of ‘slavery’ that is so insidious most people don’t even know it has happened to them. BUT, it’s not all doom and gloom. There is a solution.
The solution is to take back your power.

How it is possible that the president can bomb a foreign country or threaten a full-scale international war without so much as even mentioning the need for Congress to chime in, let alone actually vote on a declaration of war? The short answer is disinformation and propaganda, which is the domain of mainstream media. When people are confused, when the truth is hidden, when agendas are presented as life or death options, and when the public has no clue about which laws government is bound to, then anything goes. #disinformation

Under the guise of stopping “fake news,” internet watchdogs are burying alternative news that threatens mainstream financial interests. Major media companies have pharmaceutical leaders on their boards and their reporting is shaped by revenue from their many drug ads. Medical news outlets also bury news that would harm commercial drug products.

Mainstream media used to report the details of policy proposals in great detail. But since the Reagan era, the networks have largely kept their coverage exclusively to personality, scandal, and horse race. Why would that be? Why, since the late 1980s, has the “news” lost any semblance of actual news and detail, and degenerated into a cleaned-up version of the National Enquirer?