Win for Clean Water as Polluting Dams Forced Into Accountability

Written by on August 6, 2014 in Environment with 0 Comments

Max Ocean| Commondreams

The Bonneville Dam in the Columbia River, seen from 3000 feet. (Credit: flickr/cc/Eric Prado)

The Bonneville Dam in the Columbia River, seen from 3000 feet. (Credit: flickr/cc/Eric Prado)

Settlement reached between US Army Corps of Engineers and Columbia Riverkeeper over 8 dams in Pacific Northwest will bring ‘end to toxic spills and chronic seepage of pollutants.'

In a groundbreaking settlement (pdf) reached on Monday in a response to a suit brought by Columbia Riverkeeper, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers agreed to finally be subject to federal oversight by the Environmental Protection Agency and to disclose the details of the pollutants it releases into two rivers in the Pacific Northwest.

“This is a huge day for clean water,” said Brett VandenHeuvel, Columbia Riverkeeper’s executive director. “For years, the dams have discharged harmful oil pollution into the Columbia and Snake rivers, and finally that will stop. With the dams coming into compliance with the Clean Water Act, hopefully we will see an end to toxic spills and chronic seepage of pollutants that have been harming our community.”

The settlement could potentially impact how federal oversight of Army Corps dams is performed nationwide.

“Columbia Riverkeeper’s settlement has implications for dams operating without pollution permits across the country,” stated Melissa Powers, environmental law professor at Lewis and Clark Law School and expert in the federal Clean Water Act.  “Like any industrial facility, dams are prohibited from discharging pollution until they obtain pollution permits.”

While the Corps was already required to report spills that occurred, before the ruling it was not required to track the amount of oil going into the water as part of its regular operations, nor did it give information to outside groups concerning how much oil was generally going into the water.

The Corps had previously claimed in letters to state agencies that the EPA did not have the authority to regulate it.

According to the AP “the EPA had the authority to regulate the dams' pollution before the settlement, but it could not compel the Corps to file for a pollution permit.”

Now the Corps will regularly notify Columbia Riverkeeper concerning daily discharges from a total of eight dams into both the Snake River and the Columbia River, and is required to apply for EPA pollution permits within the year. The settlement will also “require the Corps to use environmentally-friendly oils, such as biodegradable oils, if it's feasible,” according to VandenHeuvel.

In 2009 the EPA found a number of harmful toxins in fish in the Columbia River, most notably PCBs, a potentially carcinogenic synthetic that was banned from production in the U.S. in 1979.

The Army Corps of Engineers is the largest owner-operator of dams in the country.

Riverkeeper's VandenHeuvel explains the importance of the victory in the video below:

More from Commondreams

Tags: , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend