Why the TTIP Will Worsen Income Inequality

Written by on January 21, 2016 in Government, Policies with 8 Comments
Corporate-friendly agreements like TTIP are nothing less than Robin Hood in reverse in which the wealth and power of the many is transferred to the elite few. (Image: flickr/cc/Lance Page/t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Steve Wampler, epicharmus)

Corporate-friendly agreements like TTIP are nothing less than Robin Hood in reverse in which the wealth and power of the many is transferred to the elite few. (Image: flickr/cc/Lance Page/t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Steve Wampler, epicharmus)

By Nick Dearden | Common Dreams

Huge corporations and the seriously wealthy will be the big winners from the controversial US-EU trade deal known as TTIP. That’s the implication of a new study which shows that billions of pounds have been won by giant companies like Mobil, EDF, Enron, Suez and Cargill, which have sued governments under similar treaties for taking action they believe to be ‘unfair’.

Related Article: The TPP is the Most Brazen Corporate Power Grab in American History – Chris Hedges

The most controversial element of TTIP is the ‘corporate court’ system, formally called ISDS. This system allows multinational corporations and other foreign ‘investors’ to sue governments for enacting regulation which damage their profits. Proponents argue that this offers investors, like small business, protection against ‘arbitrary’ government action.

But such corporate courts already exist in numerous other agreements and have allowed corporations to take action against many developing countries for freezing water and electricity prices, raising the minimum wage, introducing a sugar tax and putting health warnings on cigarette packages.

Gus van Harten’s new report shows that the really big winners of these cases are, unsurprisingly, really big corporations (over $1 billion in annual revenue) and super rich individuals (over $100 million wealth). Almost 95% of all compensation awarded in the corporate court cases studied went to these groups.

The report also shows that the success rate of cases brought by such corporate giants is around 71% – far greater than the success rate of smaller companies and investors.

This means, as has often big argued, corporate courts act to redistribute income from the public purse to the richest people in the world. $6.7 billion has been won in 48 cases, with another $1 billion being won by super rich individuals. While smaller companies and investors do sometimes take action, the report suggests that any winnings on their part  is normally wiped out by the legal costs.

Related Article: Full Text of TPP Released to Public… And It’s Horrible

In fact, the biggest sums have been won by well-known extractive and energy companies – with Occidental, Mobil, EDF, BG Group, Enron and Chevron winning cases, especially against countries like Ecuador, Venezuela and Argentina.

Interestingly the biggest such case in history – $50 billion awarded against Russia – has been dealt with separately because of its size. Van Harten suggests that this case was essentially won by Russian oligarchs using a series of European tax havens, including the Isle of Man.

Another big winner is what van Harten terms the ‘ISDS legal industry’ – including a selection of corporate law firms – which has made an incredible $1.7 billion in over 214 cases. Perhaps this shouldn’t be surprising, given a Friends of the Earth report from last year which showed that legal costs for such ISDS cases average over $8 million, exceeding $30 million in some cases, while 80% of the legal costs end up in the pockets of the parties’ lawyers. Elite law firms can charge  $1,000 per hour, per lawyer.

The biggest losers of all, of course, is  public. In the cases studies by van Harten, $10 billion has haemorrhaged from the pockets of developing world governments. But this will only be the tip of the iceberg if TTIP and its sister agreements like CETA (the EU-Canada agreement) are agreed. After all, most cases to date have been won outside Europe and the USA. TTIP and CETA will open up far most lucrative cases up to far more business.

Related Article: Project Censored #9: The Poor Get Less Media Coverage Than Billionaires Do

The idea that TTIP is about hard-done-by small business is clearly untrue. TTIP is a vehicle for channeling wealth from the public to the 1%.

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

Nick Dearden is the director of Global Justice Now (formerly World Development Movement) and former director of Jubilee Debt Campaign.

Tags: , , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

8 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 1549624428690401@facebook.com' Raphael Snelten says:


  2. 1536357713341481@facebook.com' Owen Heath says:

    It’s like when you see in movies arranged marriages to reinforce alliances and consolidate forces to further benefit the wealth and power of the involved parties. The greedy inbreds are making contracts with each other to try to expand their empires with less inbreeding. Filthy greedy cunts.

  3. 150125078697855@facebook.com' Jaybird Rothschild says:

    I think Obama should wipe his ass with it on live TV, then have the people who wrote it arrested…

  4. 1063615010355568@facebook.com' Robert Peter says:

    Greed is a serious mental disease.

  5. 913416585380327@facebook.com' Ramos Spacko Johnson says:

    a dirty scam

  6. 10208662835593555@facebook.com' L Giulio Masini says:

    What do you think about this 5 minute video on “American greed”:
    “The Government vs. the American Character” ( 269,652 views)

    What do you think about this 5 minute video?
    “Is Capitalism Moral?”

    This 5 minute video explains why Liberals don’t like America or capitalism and why they support Berie Sanders. This uses Isreal as an example.
    What do you think of this 5 minute video?
    “Do You Pass the Israel Test?”

    The Myth of the Red State:
    The argument is that the states that get more from the federal government than they pay in taxes tend to be red states, whereas the states that give more to the federal government than they pay in taxes tend to be blue states. This “red state welfare” hypothesis falls completely apart when we look at the data.
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

    WHat do you think about this 5 minute video about the American Robber Barron? (564,962 views)
    “Rockefeller: The Richest American Who Ever Lived”

    What do you think about this 5 min. Video?
    “Why Rent Control Hurts Renters”
    (150,654 viewers)

    This 5 minute video explains why people vote Republican:
    “What Makes America Different?”

    What do you think about this 5 min video about government regulations? ( 241,783 views)
    “What Creates Wealth?”

    Teach a man to fish and he can feed his family for life!! Steal the fish from the fisherman and give it to another and he will vote Dem for life!!
    With free money, why would anyone work in America?

    What do you think about this 5 min video? “Why Capitalism Works”

    If Obama and Reagan were to sit down and have a 5 minute conversation on Reagan vs. Obama economics, this is how it would look in this 5 minute animated video:
    “Socialism Explained”

    (From WSJ.com)

    “…it should be possible to revive a national consensus affirming that capitalism embraces the best and most essential things about American life; that freeing capitalism to do what it does best won’t just create national wealth and reduce poverty, but expand the ability of Americans to achieve earned success—to pursue happiness.”

    Here’s a 5 minute video that illustrates what Trump wants to do to the US economy with his tax plan:
    “How to Solve America’s Spending Problem” (241,889 views)

    What do you think about this 5 min video? (562,892 views)MI
    “America’s Debt Crisis Explained”

    The US Government spends $87,000 per family per year to fight poverty. So, why is there poverty in the US?
    What do you think about this 5 minute video?
    “The Bigger the Government…”

    What do you think about this 5 min video? (444,962 views)
    “What is Social Justice?”

    What do you think about this 5 minute video?:
    “What Creates Wealth?”
    PragerUniversity (318,938 views)

    What party do corporations own?
    What do you think about this 5 min video? (241,889 views)
    “Do Big Unions Buy Politicians?”

    What do you think about this 5 min video?
    “Teachers Unions vs. Students”

    Minimum wage is not to meant to be a living wage, but a starting point to (experience) a better job!!

    Maybe you have not seen the new “automated McDonalds”, No counter people, you select from a posted menu, slide you CC and then they bring the food to you. Half the employees got a raise to $15.00 per hour the other half lost there jobs.

    McDonald’s Automated touch-screen cashier in New York City

    From j sadowsky’s ‘The Blog That Isn’t’ – NEW RULE: For as long as Corporate Welfare Tax Loopholes Stand, There will be no Local, State or Federal Income Taxes on Individuals who’s Income is Less Than $ 70,000 a year! This is the Minimum Wage that enables a person to live moderately securely and to withstand ‘minor’ increases in Essential Costs of Food, Clothing, Household Items, Housing, Insurance, Medical, Transportation… without at least one of them being threatened! This will help the vast majority of Americans while quickly circulating more money into ‘our’ economy as opposed to Unpatriotic Corporate Monoliths pouring unseemly Profits and USA Money overseas to Avoid Their Fair Share!

    The New York Times says the right minimum wage is $0/hr.
    What do you think if this 5 minute video? (390,924 views)
    “What’s the Right Minimum Wage?”

    What do you think about this 5 minute video?
    “Money in Politics: What’s the Problem?”

  7. 1063565703696291@facebook.com' Jeff Andrews says:


  8. 677161089082794@facebook.com' Dlav Gaucher says:

    Squash the tpp…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend