Terrorism Act Used as Reason for Seizing Journalist’s Computer

Posted by on October 31, 2015 in Government, Internet Control with 9 Comments

computer security


By John Vibes | ActivistPost

A BBC journalist recently had his computer confiscated by British police because he was conducting interviews with people the government suspected were terrorists. Journalist Secunder Kermani has been working with BBC’s Newsnight for just over a year and has developed a reputation for obtaining exclusive interviews with Western-born ISIS fighters. This reputation caught the eye of the British government, which used powers granted through the Terrorism Act to confiscate the reporter’s property.

According to a statement from the BBC:

Police obtained an order under the Terrorism Act requiring the BBC to hand over communication between a Newsnight journalist and a man in Syria who had publicly identified himself as an IS member. The man had featured in Newsnight reports and was not a confidential source.

Newsnight editor Ian Katz said these types of confiscations could prevent reporters from being able to cover related issues.

“While we would not seek to obstruct any police investigation we are concerned that the use of the Terrorism Act to obtain communication between journalists and sources will make it very difficult for reporters to cover this issue of critical public interest,” Katz said.

Thames Valley Police responded: “The BBC attended the hearing in August and did not contest the application or decision of the court. Police have since returned the laptop that was the subject of this order,”  they said.

The government’s use of these these powers to target the press has far reaching implications for journalists and their sources. It will now be even more difficult for reporters to work with whistleblowers and other confidential sources because it could be a liability to end up on a reporter’s hard drive. Just because the ISIS members in question were not confidential sources does not mean legitimate confidential sources were not exposed when the government confiscated the hard drive.

“There’s a chilling effect – I know material has not been published or broadcast because of anxiety to protect sources. We are talking notes, emails, video footage, audio [being seized]. I don’t think we are hearing the accounts of why young people are going [to Syria]. The debate has not been advanced by informed coverage because the media is in fear of the Terrorism Act,” media lawyer Gavin Millar told the Independent.

“It [sic] think it makes it very difficult to do proper reporting in this territory when the cops can come in and get orders for material as easily as they can. The police have the authority to seize anything that they think will be of use to them in a terror investigation and that’s quite a wide net,” another BBC source said.

A similar situation occurred two years ago when David Miranda, partner of Glenn Greenwald, was detained at Heathrow Airport under counter-terrorism powers. Miranda is still in the process of appealing the use of counter-terrorism authority during his detention.

Tags: , , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

9 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Sabreena Juanillo says:


  2.' T. Beckett Townley says:

    More than likely, he was interviewing people in the know, about the one world order, governmental takeovers and the United Nations, control.

  3.' Stephen Owen-Williams says:

    It probably had too much truth on it

  4.' Revolution de Mind says:

    anyone adore this as much as i do :

  5.' Barbara Anne Roberts says:

    Innocent until proven guilty? Has this concept been overlooked.

  6.' Rebecca Baxter says:


New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend