Thrive II Preview

SMOKING GUN! About 15% of Bernie Sanders Votes May Have Been ‘Flipped’ to Clinton in CA Primary

By Richard Charnin | Richard Charnin Blog

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders waves to the crowd as he prepares to speak to thousands of supporters at the downtown convention center Tuesday, March 22. (Photo: Hayne Palmour IV — San Diego Union-Tribune)

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders waves to the crowd as he prepares to speak to thousands of supporters at the downtown convention center Tuesday, March 22. (Photo: Hayne Palmour IV — San Diego Union-Tribune)

In California on Election Day, Clinton led Sanders 56.8-43.2% in Total Votes Cast. Sanders leads in Updates since Election Day by 51.1-48.9% . The updates include mail-ins, crossover ballots, provisional ballots and others. Technically, these votes are probably not all hand-counted, although we have been told that they have been individually verified.

It appears that nearly 15% of Sanders’ votes were flipped to Clinton on maliciously-coded voting machines and central tabulators.

Sanders hand-counted share exceeded his machine-counted share in virtually ALL 58 counties. The probability of this occurrence is ZERO.

View the CA Update spreadsheet.

Sander’s Vote share change from Election Day

 California Election Day June 7  Sanders 43.63% June 8 – June 25 Sanders 51.11% Change           +7.48%
ALAMEDA 39.1% 61.1% 22.0%
ALPINE 67.4% 72.7% 5.3%
AMADOR 42.5% 52.8% 10.3%
BUTTE 53.5% 72.4% 18.9%
CALAVERAS 44.9% 60.5% 15.6%
COLUSA 41.6% 55.4% 13.8%
CONTRA COSTA 32.6% 47.1% 14.5%
DEL NORTE 52.7% 72.6% 19.9%
EL DORADO 44.3% 56.6% 12.3%
FRESNO 32.1% 50.9% 18.8%
GLENN 48.0% 57.8% 9.8%
HUMBOLDT 61.2% n/a n/a
IMPERIAL 24.7% 34.6% 9.9%
INYO 50.4% 59.2% 8.8%
KERN 35.1% 47.6% 12.5%
KINGS 34.6% 58.4% 23.8%
LAKE 44.7% n/a n/a
LASSEN 51.4% 67.5% 16.1%
LOS ANGELES 33.4% 49.9% 16.5%
MADERA 39.6% 55.7% 16.1%
MARIN 36.6% 43.8% 7.2%
MARIPOSA 48.9% 68.7% 19.8%
MENDOCINO 58.8% n/a n/a
MERCED 36.4% 49.4% 13.0%
MODOC 53.7% n/a n/a
MONO 81.5% 69.7% -11.8%
MONTEREY 36.3% 49.9% 13.6%
NAPA 37.8% 51.8% 14.0%
NEVADA 55.7% 64.3% 8.6%
ORANGE 36.4% 53.6% 17.2%
PLACER 36.5% n/a n/a
PLUMAS 55.0% n/a n/a
RIVERSIDE 32.5% 47.0% 14.5%
SACRAMENTO 35.5% 46.1% 10.6%
SAN BENARDINO 34.3% 48.9% 14.6%
SAN BENITO 36.8% 47.0% 10.2%
SAN DIEGO 35.8% 51.4% 15.6%
SAN FRANCISCO 37.6% 50.9% 13.3%
SAN JOAQUIN 34.4% 45.6% 11.2%
SAN LUIS OBISPO 43.9% 62.3% 18.4%
SAN MATEO 30.9% 42.2% 11.3%
SANTA BARBARA 40.6% 56.1% 15.5%
SANTA CLARA 34.3% 48.0% 13.7%
SANTA CRUZ 47.9% 62.4% 14.5%
SHASTA 45.8% 59.9% 14.1%
SIERRA 59.3% 66.7% 7.4%
SISKIYOU 53.5% 64.4% 10.9%
SOLANO 36.8% 56.2% 19.4%
SONOMA 44.3% n/a n/a
STANISLAUS 37.1% 48.8% 11.7%
SUTTER 40.1% 50.3% 10.2%
TEHAMA 44.8% 55.7% 10.9%
TRINITY 59.8% 74.8% 15.0%
TULARE 37.6% 48.2% 10.6%
TUOLUMNE 46.0% 62.5% 16.5%
VENTURA 40.1% 54.6% 14.5%
YOLO 40.3% 58.7% 18.4%
YUBA 44.4% 56.1% 11.7%

Posted 6/25/2016 on Facebook by Phillip Wyler Evans:

Votes counted on Election Day
Clinton led Sanders by 56.37-43.63% (1,940,580-1,502,043 votes)

Votes counted since Election Day:
Sanders led Clinton by 51.11 – 48.89% (711,554-680,724 votes)

Poll workers claim that 50% to 90% of voters who were supposed to have been eligible to vote in the Democratic primary were told they would have to vote using provisional ballots.  There were two reasons for this:

1-previously registered voters’ names had been removed from the rolls.

2- Some were marked as vote by mail voters – but they had received no ballot in the mail.  Virtually all who were not  allowed to vote and forced to vote provisional ballots were Bernie Sanders supporters.

Poll workers in Los Angeles and Orange County report that Bernie won the electronic votes in their precincts by well over a 2 to 1 margin, the opposite of the vote count.  The contrast indicates vote-flipping.

If you add the lower figure of 50% of voters who were not allowed to vote regular ballots for Bernie to the votes he received, you wind up with a substantial Sanders landslide victory in California.  The primary beneficiary of the fraud is Hillary Clinton.

[Read more here]


Robert O'Leary 150x150

Robert O’Leary, JD BARA, has had an abiding interest in alternative health products & modalities since the early 1970’s & he has seen how they have made people go from lacking health to vibrant health. He became an attorney, singer-songwriter, martial artist & father along the way and brings that experience to his practice as a BioAcoustic Soundhealth Practitioner, under the tutelage of the award-winning founder of BioAcoustic Biology, Sharry Edwards, whose Institute of BioAcoustic Biology has now been serving clients for 30 years with a non-invasive & safe integrative modality that supports the body’s ability to self-heal using the power of the human voice. Robert brings this modality to serve clients in Greater Springfield (MA), New England & “virtually” the world, with his website. He can also be reached at romayasoundhealthandbeauty@gmail.


Tags: , , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

3 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Beth Tucker Beth Tucker says:

    Did u think for a minute voting would make a difference?
    They are SELECTED not ELected

  2. … they used this for Obummer’s win too … thats why killary is still going for the white house

  3. ?

    ?URL :- CLOUDX1.TK


New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend