Senate Passes Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims’ Families to Seek Justice Against Saudi Government

Written by on May 18, 2016 in Government, Policies with 8 Comments

SaudiFlag911

By Jay Syrmopoulos | Activist Post

In a stunning rebuke to President Obama’s warning of a veto, and the Saudi threat to attempt to crash the U.S. economy by selling off their U.S. holdings, the U.S. Senate unanimously approved legislation that would allow Americans to sue foreign governments for terrorist attacks committed on U.S. soil, according to The Hill.

In an exceedingly rare moment, the Senate voted unanimously for the bipartisan “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act,” sponsored by John Cornyn and Chuck Shumer. The legislation now moves to the U.S. House of Representatives, which has its own version of the bill.

“This bill is very near and dear to my heart as a New Yorker because it would allow the victims of 9/11 to pursue some small measure of justice,” said Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, according to The Hill. “[This is] another example of the [John] Cornyn-Schumer collaboration, which works pretty well around here.”

The legislation had been held up by a known war-hawk, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, citing concerns that it would potentially allow for foreign governments to follow suit – a harrowing prospect for a country that uses the CIA to foment revolutions across the globe. Over the recent congressional recess, Graham dropped the hold, according to The Hill.

The bipartisan bill has ignited threats from the Saudi government and further strained already tense ties for the long-standing Petrodollar alliance between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. As we reported previously, the Saudis have warned the Obama administration that if the bill becomes law, the Kingdom would sell off its U.S. treasury holdings in an attempt to crash the U.S. economy.


In response, the White House made clear President Obama’s intention to veto the bill, which if passed would clear the way for families of victims of 9/11 to pursue lawsuits against Saudi Arabia in relation to the terrorist attacks.

“Given the long list of concerns I have expressed . . . it’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which the president would sign the bill as it’s currently drafted,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said last month, according to The Hill. “A country with a modern and large economy like Saudi Arabia would not benefit from a destabilized global financial market, and neither would the United States.”

The bill faces opposition in the House of Representatives as well, with Speaker Paul Ryan leading the charge to stifle accountability for the perpetrators of 9/11.

“I think we need to review it to make sure we are not making mistakes with our allies and we’re not catching people in this that shouldn’t be caught up in this,” Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said last month.

If passed, the legislation would allow for an exception to the sovereign immunity doctrine as established in 1976, which has protected the Saudi government from lawsuits relating to the 9/11 attacks.

Citing sovereign immunity, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit by the 9/11 families against the kingdom in September 2015. Under the Cornyn-Schumer bill; however, Riyadh could be sued because the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon killed American citizens on US soil, according to a report by RT.

Obama claims his opposition to the legislation is due to the potential legal risk it would pose to American citizens.

“If we open up the possibility that individuals in the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries,” Obama said in an interview with CBS News.

Of course the administration can’t outright admit that they are attempting to keep the truth of the events of 9/11 buried, thus, the White House claims that weakening the sovereign immunity provisions would put the American government, along with its citizens and corporations, in legal risk abroad because other nations might retaliate with their own legislation.

In layman terms, if the U.S. fully explores the role of the Saudis in the 9/11 attacks, due to the passing of this bill, then other nations would perhaps follow suit and strip U.S. immunity — in respect to terror attacks on their soil.

Essentially, the U.S. government fears that their own global terrorist misdeeds, fomented by the CIA, will then be unmasked if there is a reciprocation by other nations — an almost unthinkable scenario for those in power.

Image Credit: TheAntiMedia.org

Jay Syrmopoulos writes for TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared.

Read more great articles at Activist Post.

Tags: , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

8 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 10154840492629829@facebook.com' Ryan S. Thompson says:

    Money isn’t going to bring their family members back, but justice will finally close the chapter.

  2. 10153558774771774@facebook.com' Liam Havard says:

    After Saudi Government “supposedly” threatened to release documents on 9/11….

  3. 10205963099853544@facebook.com' Chantell Bree VanRheede VanOudtshoorn says:

    What about Bush & all the other politicians involved in 9/11?

  4. 10154280119076654@facebook.com' Jay Sheldon says:

    What they REALLY need a the ability to go after the real conspirators and criminals, the U.S. government!

  5. 10153871233552604@facebook.com' Fabiola Lazarus says:

    Even though it was inside job and the three buildings went down perfectly Mr. President will veto the bill.

  6. 10208535600692622@facebook.com' Elijah Durham says:

    Nothing for the soldiers who faught two useless wars tho. Next time they talk abouy support our troops or protesters stepping on flags remember this and what our government thinks about its troops and their families.

  7. 10153727407339163@facebook.com' Akhta Nawas says:

    Sounds stupid to me. This is going to be a American only claim. American law has nothing to do with Saudi law. American courts have no jurisdiction with Saudi Arabia.

  8. 600891843408586@facebook.com' Daniel Sparks says:

    Pitch forks and torches

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend