Russell Brand Vs Fox News on Israel-Gaza Conflict

Sydney Morning Herald

Russell Brand continues to become better known for his candid political attacks than his comedic acts.

This time, the 39-year-old has become involved in a tit-for-tat online feud over the highly sensitive Israel-Gaza conflict with a Fox News presenter.

Last week the British actor, author and comedian posted a video accusing Fox’s Sean Hannity of “behaving like a terrorist”.

The video, posted on Brand’s satirical YouTube channel ‘The Trews’, was a response to a segment Hannity filmed on the crisis.

In the clip, Brand accused Hannity of being pro-Israel and of bullying his guests.

“Sean’s not interested in truth,” Brand says, “Hannity is only interested pushing a particular perspective.”

Hannity repeatedly asks a Palestinian-American guest about how he would feel if missiles were being fired into his neighbourhood, before interrupting his attempts to answer.

Hannity also asked whether the guest, Yousef Munayyer of The Palestine Centre, was “thick in the head” before yelling “Is Hamas a terrorist organisation? I’m asking you a question… Answer, answer the question! You’re a guest but you don’t get to filibuster the question.”

“One definition of terrorism is using intimidation to achieve your goals,”  Brand said, in response. “Who in that situation was behaving like a terrorist?

“Sean Hannity – that’s where the terrorism’s coming from.”

Hannity hit back at Brand a day later, saying: “Yesterday, Russell Brand a d-list actor, better known for his failed marriage to Katy Perry recorded himself going on a 12-and-a-half-minute tirade against little old me.”

Hannity continues: “Russell, if you’re watching, which I know you are, take a close look at the TV so I can educate you because you’re kind of dumb and ignorant.”

But, Brand appears to have had the greater impact.

His clip has been viewed by more than 2.3 million people, a point not lost on Hannity’s guest Yousef Munayyer.

In a tweet on August 3, Munayyer pointed out that Brand’s “slamming” of Hannity was viewed more times than the interview itself. Now, Brand has added fuel to the fire of this “online spat”.

Brand has now posted a second 13 minute video, in which he addresses their “trivial conflict which actually has as its background the worst conflict on the planet”. 

Brand breaks down Hannity’s attack, in which Hannity apologised if Brand didn’t like his “style of interviewing”.

“It’s not a style of interviewing,” Brand responds. “It’s because he got that bloke on… to talk for Muslim people and then didn’t let him answer… 

“What’s your style of interviewing Sean? ‘I don’t let people respond to questions that I ask them and then I bully and berate them and then… revert to my own agenda aggressively’… that’s not a style of interviewing, that’s not doing it.”

Brand then plays a part of Hannity’s rebuttal:

“Apparently Russell can’t get it through his thick head and possibly fathom that this is the reality,” Hannity said.

Russell responds: “It’s not a reality. It’s a combination of speculation, conjecture, and highly contextualised and selective information. That’s not reality. It’s piecing together a narrative that fits in with Fox’s world view and his own bigoted world view,” he says.

“That’s not reality, it’s a tiny aperture through which bigoted and particular information is glimpsed. That’s sort of the opposite of all encompassing, wonderful, unknowable reality.”

The second clip, posted on Friday, has already had more than one million views.

The articulate tirade is just the latest of many for the star, who refers to himself as a “recovering junkie”.

Only recently, Brand stood before tens of thousands of people in London’s Parliament Square and called for a “joyful revolution”.

Read the full post here.

Tags: , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

4 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Jeff says:

    War-mongering Fox Agenda Promoter Hannity brings Bernie McJERK & that dizzy chic from “Imus in the Morning” to help defend him & his point? Dude. No, really, DUDE. Geraldo Rivera was the only person on that set even remotely worthy of credibility.

  2.' Sybille Nova says:

    It is absolutely clear that US mainstream TV hosts and anchors d o need to follow a script.These people presumably get predigested information from the people who want to push their ( in the case of USRAEL) Israel friendly agenda.This – by the way – has n o t h i n g to do at all with peaceloving Jews all over the planet.The history of Palestine has been misrepresented to a degree that you would need to exchange a TV host/anchor with a historian to get facts straight.It’s very superficial , what these wellpaid puppets say….they can’t be taken serious…it’s better not to even watch them anymore.

  3.' Katherine L. says:

    They all follow an agenda, the machine of main stream and watch out for the dis/mis-information trolls lurking in some alternative media channels too. If you’re awake and have a handle on your ‘skills”, you have the upper hand, you can tell where truth is, if you’re part of zombie land, god help you. Given these two, I lean towards Russell as whacky as that may ‘appear.’

  4.' Katherine L. says:

    I don’t. I don’t watch the Television anymore. Tossed it out.

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend