Media Matrix: An Ancient Perspective on Modern Media

Jon Rappoport | NoMoreFakeNews

“A long time ago, teachers and students in Tibet considered themselves artists of reality. They practiced inventing it. And then, separating themselves from every other spiritual system, they practiced destroying what they created. Back and forth, back and forth, with the goal of achieving an intimate knowledge of their own existence.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Television news is about giving the viewer a dose of mind control, but what’s the underlying principle?

Answer: Something is better than nothing.

Corollary: A lot of something is better than even a little bit of nothing.

Imagine this: an elite television news anchor just sits there in front of the camera for a half-hour. Silently. People watching this would start to get very antsy. They would feel anger and rage building up inside them.


Why? What’s wrong with nothing? Why is it so maligned? “And now, tonight, we have no news to report. Nothing happened today.” What?? “He’s crazy. He’s a lunatic. Get him off the air. He’s making me feel…”

Making the viewer feel what? And why?

For the early Tibetan adepts, the Void was a vital concept. Stripped of its metaphysical baggage and embroidery, Void was the place where creating stopped. The constant “noise of existence” went away. The ongoing parade of inner thoughts, sentiments, propensities—vanished. For as long as a person wanted to stay there. And experience the greatest “vacation” he’d ever known. If he could handle it.

But humans felt a great need to avoid the Void. They demanded activity, flow, information. They eventually sank to the level of passivity…and then they simply wanted input, more input, and still more input. From an authoritative unimpeachable external source. Hence, from the earliest societies onward, there was a thing called: the news.

It was updated. It was ongoing. It was forever. Priests delivered it. Kings delivered it. Their minions delivered it. If the news stopped, people felt anxiety, which, at bottom, was a fear of Void.

There is much more to say about the Tibetans and their understanding of Void and its twin, ongoing Creation, but I’ll save that for another time. Now, in these times, the global population has television news. The imitations of life called anchors are the arbiters. How they speak, how they look, how they themselves experience emotion—all this is planted deep in the minds of the viewers.

Much of the world can’t imagine the evening news could look and sound any other way. That’s how solid the long-term brainwashing is. The elite anchors, from John Daly, in the early days of television, all the way to Lester Holt and Scott Pelley, have set the style. They define the genre.

The anchor taps into, and mimics, that part of the audience’s psyche that wants smooth delivery of superficial cause and effect. (In the Void, of course, cause and effect dissolve.)

The network anchor is the wizard of Is. He keeps explaining what is. “Here’s something that is, and then over here we have something else that is, and now, just in, a new thing that is.” He lays down miles of “is-concrete” to pave over deeper, uncomfortable truth.

Ultimately, he is paving over Void. On air, the anchor is neutral, a castratus, a eunuch.

This is a time-honored ancient tradition. The eunuch, by his diminished condition, has the trust of the ruler. He guards the emperor’s inner sanctum. He acts as a buffer between his master and the people. He applies the royal seal to official documents.

All expressed shades of emotion occur and are managed within that persona of the dependable court eunuch. The anchor who can move the closest to the line of being human without actually arriving there is the champion. These days, it was, until his downfall, Brian Williams.

The vibrating string between eunuch and human is the frequency that makes an anchor great. Think Cronkite, Chet Huntley, Edward R Murrow. Huntley was a just a touch too masculine, so they teamed him up with David Brinkley, a medium-boiled egg. Brinkley supplied twinkles of comic relief.

There are other reasons for “voice-neutrality” of the anchor. Neutrality conveys a sense of science. “We did the experiment in the lab and this is how it turned out.”

Television news is really all segue all the time. That’s what it comes down to. The word “segue,” pronounced “segway,” refers to a transition from one thing to another, a blend. Ed McMahon once referred to Johnny Carson as the prince of blends, because Carson could tell a clunker of a joke, step on it three times, and still move to the next joke without losing his audience.

Television news is very serious business. A reporter who can’t handle segues is dead in the water. He’s a gross liability. The good anchors can take two stories that have no connection whatsoever and create a sense of smooth transition. Brian Williams could say, “The planes were recalled later in the afternoon…And a man was cut in two in a horrific accident in Idaho today…And in Seattle (smile), three people reported seeing turtles falling from the sky.”

And it works. The segue works. The blends from one story to another seem reasonable somehow.

The networks basically have, on a daily basis, radically fragmented stories, and they need an anchor who can do the blends, the segues, and get away with it, to promote the sense of one continuous flow. So the audience doesn’t say, “This is just an odd collection of surreal moments,this is Salvador Dali on my television screen.”

The news is all segue all the time.

Not just nationally. On the local level, too. The pounding lead-in music at the top of the show prepares the audience. A) Music. B) “Tonight, our top story: a man ate a hot dog and died …” The voice of the anchor is the non-stop blending machine that ties all news stories together. That’s why the elite network stars earn their paychecks. Good segue people are stage magicians. They can move the viewer’s attention from item A to item B without a tremor or a doubt. The segue, the blend not only connects wildly disparate pieces, it keeps the viewer from brushing up against the Void. The blend is the primary mechanism for creating an endless river of “information” linoleum with no cracks.

It’s often been said of certain actors, “He could read from the phone book and you’d listen.” Well, an elite anchor can hold the viewer’s mind as he reads a sentence from the phone book, another one from a car-repair manual, a third from a cookbook, and a fourth from a funeral-home brochure. Without stopping.

And afterward, the viewer would have no questions.

The news is surreal because the stories are mostly fool’s gold to begin with; and they’re unrelated. They’re rocks lying around. The anchor picks them up and invents the illusion of One Flowing Stream.

This is what the audience wants. The news feels like a story. It feels like unity. It feels like a stage play or a movie. It feels, when all is said and done, good. You can’t pull just anyone off the street and have him describe car crashes, murders, storms, threats of war, political squabbles, 300 cats living in a one-room apartment, a new piece of Medicare legislation, genitalia picture tweets, and the dedication of a new library, while keeping the audience in a light trance.

Read the rest of the article here.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

10 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 865255813582089@facebook.com' Dinah Briggs says:

    Truth.

  2. 183221622018602@facebook.com' Wade Wilson says:

    No shit lol.

  3. 1019375924791192@facebook.com' Patricia Cameron says:

    Too true

  4. 1657614431194546@facebook.com' Jan Mortimer says:

    Well?????

  5. 10153813044677845@facebook.com' Jen Gravelle says:

    The proof is that it’s so different all over the world???

  6. 10153100254165922@facebook.com' Robert Smith says:

    the Media is completely controlled by some corporate entities !!;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

  7. 937339376324391@facebook.com' Marielle Vuur says:

    I keep saying this to everyone and than people keep talking about stuff thats on the news being the truth. and than its me coming in saying: have you been there? the answer is again ssssh the news is on. are we dumb or what?

  8. 10152992364025812@facebook.com' Dorothy Russell says:

    true

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend