‘Ludicrous’ as Flint Tells Residents: Pay for Poisoned Water or We’ll Cut You Off

Written by on January 16, 2016 in Environment, Environmental Hazards with 25 Comments

WaterShortage-36510190_m-680x380

By Sarah Lazare | Common Dreams

Amid a crisis that has poisoned the water supply of an entire city, authorities in Flint, Michigan are under renewed fire on Friday for sending out shut-off notices to residents who are behind on paying their water bills.

Slammed as “ludicrous, the move comes as Republican Governor Rick Snyder finally asked President Obama to step in and declare a federal state of emergency.

Following a short holiday reprieve, Finance Director Jody Lundquist announced Wednesday that officials will resume sending an unspecified amount of shut-off notices to past-due accounts. According to Lundquist, the city already sent out 1,800 notices in November.

The move was immediately met with outrage among city and state residents, who say the people of Flint should not have to pay for the water that may have exposed them and their loved ones to irreversible lead poisoning.

“They have irreparably harmed children and families by poisoning the water,” Lonnie Scott, executive director for Progress Michigan, told Common Dreams. “It is ludicrous that they would even consider sending shut-off notices.”

“All arrears should be cleared,” Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU of Michigan, told Detroit Free Press on Monday. “No one should have to pay for this.”

The city has already been rebuked for dramatically—and suddenly—hiking water rates 35 percent in 2011. A Genesee circuit court judge ruled in August that this hike was unlawful and ordered an injunction. The city claims that the latest rounds of shut-off notices were based on decreased water and sewer rates since the injunction.

But this claim did not temper anger, particularly in a scenario that invokes the related crisis in Detroit—where mass water shut-offs provoked a public health crisis so severe that United Nations officials declared a human rights emergency.

The water crises in both Flint and Detroit were enforced by emergency managers appointed by Republican governor Rick Snyder. Both cities are majority black, with high levels of poverty, and many charge that the state's undermining of local democracy was racist and undemocratic at its core.

The water crisis in Flint prompted the resignation of Michigan's top environmental official, as well as mounting calls for the arrest of Snyder.

According to Scott, true culpability extends far beyond any one official—to the logic of austerity itself. “Emergency management in Michigan, along with decades of Republican austerity, are what has caused these disasters,” said Scott. “The attack on democracy is where this is all beginning.”

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

25 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 1665342203719820@facebook.com' Loretta Massey says:

    No

  2. 10153850075318104@facebook.com' Cecilia Hidalgo says:

    Hell no!

  3. 10201310932131141@facebook.com' Kathy Tarbox Cockrum says:

    Lawsuits!

  4. 1649870985287729@facebook.com' Angel Mia Basenova says:

    Remove that entire city council at once people.

  5. 1193272784020102@facebook.com' The Daily Truth says:

    Follow Us To Learn The Hidden Truth…!

  6. 922570787820211@facebook.com' Linda Nieuwenhuis says:

    No

  7. 865255813582089@facebook.com' Dinah Briggs says:

    Let them turn it off, at you will not be poisoned for sure, and sue them, now!

  8. 535903449905648@facebook.com' Vilma Wilkins says:

    Time to get off the city’s grid…for sure!

  9. 10206986986904636@facebook.com' Tisha Howe says:

    Elizabeth Swedo

  10. 1008542732545127@facebook.com' Lee Polack says:

    hell no

  11. 10208062889751225@facebook.com' SB Stolley says:

    If the results of the levels of poisons in that water were sent to DC with a note stating this was found in another country action would have been taken immediately. American cities and American citizens are last on the list. Particularly the less affluent.

  12. 172883543065277@facebook.com' Laura Asselin Puckett says:

    No shouldn’t pay should sue

  13. 1114429435247841@facebook.com' Patricia Harrold says:

    I say No

  14. 199600700389496@facebook.com' Nancy Mason says:

    I would tell them fine. If the whole city banded together and let them turn off all the water, then the water supplier would work quickly to get them clean water and be happy to turn it back on.

  15. 1486375328336964@facebook.com' Tomas Sanchez says:

    It’s time to storm the Bastille.

  16. 10204831330175112@facebook.com' Anita James says:

    now that takes balls ……….ok we poisoned you to save a hundred bucks a month and we still want you to pay……..really???….NOT!!!

  17. 1805398629682953@facebook.com' Chris Ballenger says:

    Criminal.

  18. 635992833206502@facebook.com' Philip Cannariato says:

    Never

  19. 1663240813945922@facebook.com' Darrell Warrington says:

    Dreadful. No .

  20. 1094359770595468@facebook.com' Denise Epstein says:

    No, in fact water at

  21. 1094359770595468@facebook.com' Denise Epstein says:

    water authorities should be prosecuted for attempted murder!

  22. 10206045713960306@facebook.com' Thomas Chenhall says:

    The only good use for that water is Stanley Meyers automotive HHO/HO technology, which could totally revive manufacturing in their town, instead of going with the depopulation and agitation approach to creating fresh terror.

  23. 10207216729209947@facebook.com' Glynn Angevin Jones says:

    No tell them to drink it 1st then you will pay 😉

  24. 174255032934270@facebook.com' Roses Are Red says:

    FUCK NO

  25. 150774681949985@facebook.com' Sharon Bell says:

    No they should not pay!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend