Seven Steps to Oneness - Journey to a Whole New Life

Hillary Clinton Goes to Bat for GMOs at Biotech Conference

Posted by on July 6, 2014 in Government, Politics with 7 Comments

Max Ocean |  Commondreams

Hillary Clinton in Hampton, NH (Photo: flickr/cc/Marc Nozell)

Hillary Clinton in Hampton, NH (Photo: flickr/cc/Marc Nozell)

Speaking at a conference in San Diego last week for the world's largest trade organization of biotechnology firms, potential presidential candidate Hillary Clinton backed GMOs and Big Ag, further displaying her allegiance to the industry in the eyes of sustainable food and organic advocates.


While trumpeting her endorsement of GMO seeds when she served as Secretary of State, Clinton told the crowd that the term “‘genetically modified' sounds Frankensteinish,” and thus turns people off to GMOs. “Drought resistant sounds really like something you'd want,” she said, encouraging the industry to improve their semantics. “There’s a big gap between the facts and what the perceptions are.”

“If Hillary Clinton intends to run for office in 2016, she should think carefully about supporting a food and farming system that is proven to be detrimental to public health.” —Katherine Paul, Organic Consumers Association

Clinton's certainty concerning the safety of GMO foods stands in stark contrast to public opinion. A Consumer Reports poll in June found that 92 percent of Americans favor labeling the foods.

U.S. campaigners rejecting the industry's push for genetically-modified crops have been pushing hard to get states to pass labeling laws.


“Hillary Clinton's views on GMOs are disappointing, but not surprising,” said Katherine Paul, associate director of the Organic Consumers Union, in an email to Common Dreams. Unfortunately, Paul continued, Clinton's positions are “no different than those of previous administrations, including the Bush, Clinton and Reagan administrations, and they are taken straight from the biotech industry's talking points.”

“Credible scientists, backed by independent (not industry-funded) studies are clear about the fact that foods containing GMOs are linked to a host of chronic illnesses,” Paul continued.”The American Medical Association has called for pre-market safety testing and a recent pilot study found unsafe levels of glysophate, the key ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup, in the blood, urine and breast milk of American women.”

During the hour that Clinton addressed the conference she also addressed fears that current subsidies and tax breaks aren't enough, or won't continue to be there in the future. “I don’t want to see biotech companies or pharma companies moving out of our country simply because of some perceived tax disadvantage and potential tax advantage somewhere else,” she assured the crowd, receiving vigorous applause in response.

“We should have an intensive discussion,” Clinton said. “Maybe there’s a way of getting a representative group of actors at the table” so that the federal government can help biotechs with “insurance against risk.”

Clinton's ties to biotech have surfaced before, particularly her history with industry heavyweight Monsanto. The Rose Law Firm where Clinton worked in the 1980s representsboth Monsanto and Tyson Foods.

Mark Penn, who served as CEO for one the world's largest public relations firms, Burson-Marsteller, which has also represented Monsanto, was a White House advisor under Bill Clinton and served as chief strategist and pollster to Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign.

During Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State, the State Department heavily pressured other countries to use GMOs through a variety of methods, including bringing foreign journalists to the U.S. to “participate in a one-week biotech tour” so that they could help shift public opinion in their home country.

Yet Clinton's choices in her personal life indicate she's not so convinced that the science is in on genetically modified foods. According to Walter Sheib, who served as White House executive chef during the Clinton presidency, the job offered him the “professional challenge of fulfilling Hillary Clinton's mandate of bringing…nutritionally responsible food to the White House,” meaning nearly everything he used “was obtained from local growers and suppliers.”

And as Mother Jones reported in 2012, Scheib said that while Clinton's rooftop garden at the White House wasn't “certified organic,” everything in it “was absolutely grown without pesticides and fertilizers. I guess it's what these days we call ‘natural.'”

“If Hillary Clinton intends to run for office in 2016, she should think carefully about supporting a food and farming system that is proven to be detrimental to public health,” said Paul, “unless she and her family are willing to give up eating organic and eat the same toxic food that she promotes to the general population.”

Watch a video of Clinton's comments below:

________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

More from Commondreams

Tags: , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

7 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Junfi@aol.com' June says:

    What a crock! First she wants to kills us with GMO food, and then she wants more subsidies and tax breaks for them so they will stay here? And what’s left of us will pay for that! (She can’t, she’s “broke”.) … I doubt if biotech companies or pharma companies will be leaving because of taxes. If other countries are smart enough to ban their products, why would they allow them in to make them?

  2. mikestokesj@gmail.com' Mike says:

    She is getting all the backing way ahead of the elections and long enough so she can turn and support at the last moment the other side just like Obama did and say yes i support labeling and safety food just to get the votes; you see it mark my words or read my lips!

  3. agjachs@msn.com' A Jachs says:

    thank you Hillary Clinton, would you like my cancer?

  4. What a shame, Hillary, I thought you were smarter than that! You’ve just lost my vote!

  5. patriciaptursi@gmail.com' Patricia Tursi says:

    I agree about genetically modified..use genetically engineered, It is more descriptive.. As to not understanding, I’ll pit my Ph.D. and knowledge about GMOs against yours, Hillary. What about experts such as Purdue Professor Emeritus Dr. Don Huber….another ignorant person. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Monsanto, the world’s most evil corporation. Among other things, Research has shown Glyphosate is connected to diabetes, to inhibition of enzymes in connection to gluten resistance and an inability to produce D3. It is killing our pollinators and is the number one killer via liver disease of young farm workers in three countries. Glyphosate is in fetal blood, in your water, your food, your air and your blood! Oh, that’s right you don’t probably eat GE food or unfiltered water. This is just a little of the devastation that GE farming has bestowed on the earth, and many species including people. Where are the Monaarchs?

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend