Groups Sue FDA Over ‘Unlawful and Irresponsible’ Approval of Frankenfish

Written by on April 1, 2016 in Food, Drink & Nutrition, Health with 3 Comments
Frankenfish

Environmental groups say the FDA has not sufficiently analyzed the risks of allowing GE salmon, such as cross-breeding. (Photo: Alaska Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/flickr/cc)

By Nadia Prupis | Common Dreams

A coalition of environmental, consumer, and fishing organizations on Thursday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approving the first-ever genetically engineered (GE) animal for commercial sale and consumption—an Atlantic salmon, known colloquially as the “Frankenfish.”

Related Article: What Does FDA-Approved GMO Salmon Really Mean for Our Health?


The lawsuit (pdf), filed by the Center for Food Safety, Food and Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Earthjustice, and other groups, states that the FDA does not have the authority to regulate GE animals and that approving the salmon paves the way for other GE fish, as well as farm animals like chickens, cows, and pigs, which the coalition says are currently in development.

The administration has previously claimed it did have the power, under the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which was crafted to ensure safety of veterinary drugs administered to treat disease in livestock.

“FDA's decision is as unlawful as it is irresponsible,” said George Kimbrell, senior attorney at the Center for Food Safety and one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs. “This case is about protecting our fisheries and ocean ecosystems from the foreseeable harms of the first-ever GE fish, harms FDA refused to even consider, let alone prevent.”

The salmon, which is being engineered by the biotechnology firm AquaBounty, was approved in November despite widespread outcry from advocates who said the fish pose too many risks to public health and the environment to authorize. The company plans to manufacture the eggs on Prince Edward Island in Canada, then ship them to laboratories in Panama, where they will be grown to full size.

From there, they will be sent to the U.S. for sale and consumption.

The journey in total comprises about 5,000 miles.

The Center for Food Safety and other groups threatened at the time to file an “emergency lawsuit” against the FDA for the move.


As Common Dreams reported:

For years, critics have warned that GMO salmon threaten wildlife populations, particularly through the potential for cross-breeding. Indeed, just a day before the FDA's announcement, a coalition of environmental groups sued the Canadian government for approving AquaBounty's request to manufacture the salmon eggs on Prince Edward Island (PEI) and ship them to laboratories in Panama, where they will be grown to adult size.

The plaintiffs in that case said the government ignored its own scientific findings to approve the bid, after the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans reported in May that GMO salmon were more susceptible to disease-causing bacteria and had other inconsistent performance issues.

Related Article: This Is Huge: Spending Bill Forces FDA to Label the New GM Salmon

“FDA has not answered crucial questions about the environmental risks posed by these fish or what can happen when these fish escape,” Brettny Hardy, an attorney for Earthjustice and another of the coalition's counsels, said Thursday. “We need these answers now and the FDA must be held to a higher standard.”

“We are talking about the mass production of a highly migratory GE fish that could threaten some of the last remaining wild salmon on the planet,” Hardy said. “This isn't the time to skimp on analysis and simply hope for the best.”

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

3 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 10206283686278990@facebook.com' Jamilah Matthews says:

    Miles Turner homegrown fish

  2. 261747090830403@facebook.com' Michele Peterson says:

    Absolutely no. GMOs are not the way of the future, they have been proven to cause mutations in laboratory animals. The research is out there, people need to make their own decisions, but as for me, no.

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend