Government Agencies ACTUALLY Admit Poisoning By Vaccines In ICD-9

Posted by on December 21, 2017 in Big Pharma, CDC, EPA & FDA, Health with 0 Comments

By Catherine J. Frompovich | Activist Post

What is ICD-9, you probably are asking.  Well, it’s the official International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, used to assign codes to diagnose and procedures associated with hospital utilization in the United States [1], and published by none other than the U.S. CDC.  See chart below.

You will note from the listing how many poisonings and other adverse effects by or from vaccines are listed along with their ICD-9 codes.  Why weren’t those codes used when infants, toddlers and teens were taken to emergency rooms by parents who say their children were compromised by vaccines?


Note none other than U.S. CDC’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid published that defining information!

However, in trying to research the current ICD-10, there seems to be some ‘sanitation efforts’ going on of the incriminating information regarding vaccines causing poisoning!  Hmmm.

So, if the fact vaccines can and do poison was an accepted and published admission by the CDC for specific medical insurance coding reasons why, then, is everyone in Big Pharma, medical doctors, FDA, pharmacists and vaccine pushers, and the media so doggone upset about parents, guardians and affected individuals talking about, documenting and reporting their experiences, plus independent vaccine data/information researchers exercising their constitutional rights to free speech

Good question?  How about “active censorship” and/or suppression of our rights to self-determination?

Moreover, what’s happened to parents’ rights to protect and preserve their children’s health from being poisoned by aluminum in any of four formulations; ethylmercury in Thimerosal; polyethylene glycol (a chemical used in antifreeze); and all the other toxic chemicals [2] (read the laundry list of chemicals in vaccines); plus foreign DNA—AND genetically modified Nano-particles / Nano-particulates indiscriminately syringed into newborns, infants, toddlers, and teens?


Why do I say “indiscriminately syringed”?

Because from all the research I’ve done on vaccines data/demographics since the mid-1980s—yes the mid-1980s!—I’ve never found any studies confirm the following:

  1. Cumulative effects of all vaccine ingredients in just one vaccine
  2. Cumulative effects of multiple vaccines’ [up to 9] ingredients given at one time
  3. CDC/FDA studies confirming health safety short- or long-term for any vaccine; why are boosters needed, if they are supposed to provide ‘immunity’ when actual lifetime immunity only is available from the natural contraction of childhood infectious diseases, i.e., measles, etc.
  4. CDC/FDA comparative studies for vaccinated versus non-vaccinated children

Furthermore, each vaccine’s package insert confirms the following:

  1. Contraindications
  2. Warnings
  3. Adverse Reactions

which indicate very serious adverse health effects everyone should know before the administration of any one vaccine, but more specifically, nine different vaccines given at the same time.

Question:  How in life can a human be subjected to nine separate diseases at the same time and expect the immune system to build immunity to each?

Impossible!  Such exposure just cannot happen!  Think about that! How bizarre a scientific attitude!

So why do Big Pharma, CDC/FDA and the consensus science medical profession contradict the laws of Nature by chemically-forcing the human body—especially a two-, four-, or six-month-old infant’s body—to react to forced chemical interventions  when a baby’s immune system is not fully developed until between two and three years of age?

What don’t Big Pharma, medicine, federal and state health agencies not get about human biology and physiology?  Is their agenda Transhumanism and Artificial Intelligence?

Technology—medical ‘consensus science’ in particular—is forcing children’s bodies to do biologically and physiologically what the human evolutionary processes over time have not provided for and, therefore, are causing medical problems for all—either immediate, short- or long-term—thereby creating life-long Big Pharma customers.

Is there a method to their scientific madness?

References:

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf

Tags: , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend