Geoengineering WON’T Stop Global Warming, Warns Study
- This is according to a Canadian-led report that looked at 100 climate studies
- The authors found that some approaches are more promising than others
- These included forest management and geological storage of CO2
- Others are less appealing, such as filling oceans with iron to absorb CO2
- It follows a similar report in February that found schemes to deliberately manipulate the Earth’s climate could prove useless, and at worst harmful
- This report found that geoengineering techniques would be unable to prevent surface temperatures from rising more than 2°C (3.6°F) by 2100
From aerosols that spray salt into the air, to machines that suck carbon from the atmosphere, scientists are conjuring up an increasing array of geoengineering techniques to battle climate change.
But this type of ‘climate engineering’ – which involves manipulating the natural processes after emissions have been released – will ultimately fail to help the world reach its emissions targets.
This is according to a new report authored by U.S. and Canadian researchers at six universities that argue tinkering with climate change isn’t a viable long-term solution to global warming.
The report looked at a range of possible climate-altering approaches and concluded there is no way around it; governments have to reduce the amount of carbon being released into the atmosphere.
‘Some climate engineering strategies look very cheap on paper,’ said Dr Jonn Axsen, lead author of the study at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada.
‘But when you consider other criteria, like ecological risk, public perceptions and the abilities of governments to control the technology, some options look very bad.’
The authors argue some approaches to climate engineering are more promising than others.
Strategies such as forest management and geological storage of carbon dioxide, for instance, may be useful if used alongside emission reduction.