Feeding People on Our Stressed Planet Will Require Revolutionary Political, Economic and Social Shifts

Posted by on August 7, 2015 in Eco-Friendly, Environment with 25 Comments

“What is obvious to us is … that if humanity is to avoid a calamitous loss of food security, a fast, society-pervading sea-change as dramatic as the first agricultural revolution will be required.” (Photo: Suzie's Farm/cc/flickr)

By Brian Bienkowski | CommonDreams.org

How do you make sure billions of people around the world have access to food?

You start a revolution.

At least that’s what two leading U.S. scientists argue in a new report. Feeding people will require cleaner energy, smarter farming and women’s rights, but also a “fundamental cultural change,” according to Paul Ehrlich, president of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University, and University of California, Berkeley, professor and researcher John Harte.

“What is obvious to us is … that if humanity is to avoid a calamitous loss of food security, a fast, society-pervading sea-change as dramatic as the first agricultural revolution will be required,” they wrote in their report published last week in the International Journal of Environmental Studies.

The amount of humans on Earth is growing—projections point to an extra 2.5 billion people by 2020. But tangled within the problem of more hungry mouths is environmental degradation, social injustice and humans pushing toward the very boundaries of the planet when it comes to resources such as food, water and energy, according to Ehrlich and Harte.

For many people across the world growing, buying or finding food is a daily struggle. More than 800 million people are estimated to be malnourished, according to the United Nations.

Billions don’t have stable, secure access to food.

“Some people say the whole problem is too many people and other people say it’s misdistribution of the crops we grow,” Ehrlich said in an interview. “They’re both right but this can’t be fixed by dealing with only one end of the problem.”

Scientists for too long have been looking at how to feed the world in “fragments,” Ehrlich said.

“Some look at solving food problems with crops grown in higher temperatures; some look at reducing waste,” he said. “It’s crystal clear that none of the things that need to be done are being done on a scale that would be helpful.”

It’s not just about pumping out more crops or reducing the amount of people. “Planning for a sustainable and effective food production system will surely require heeding constraints from nature,” Ehrlich and Harte wrote.

They argue that economic equality, population growth and environmental health are all linked. Governments must address the whole system to avoid future famine.

This means limiting greenhouse gases that warm the planet, avoiding biodiversity losses and reducing populations, they say. It means cutting back on all of the pesticides and antibiotics used to grow food. It means moving climate change to the top of political agendas and ending incentives to pull fossil fuels out of the ground.

As the planet’s population grows, environmental issues will grow too, Ehrlich said.

“We need to get a grip on population,” Harte added. But addressing climate change will be a “critical issue.”

“Nothing is worse for future food security than a future climate with more extreme events like droughts, floods,” Harte said.

Harte pointed to the ongoing California drought as an example. A University of California, Davis, report in June estimated that, in 2015, the drought would cost the California farm industry $2.7 billion and 18,000 jobs.

Solutions, like challenges, are intertwined Ehrlich and Harte say.

But they exist. Ehrlich said a good start in addressing population growth would be full women’s rights, including access to contraceptives and abortions. For agriculture, it’s a “big shift” toward organic farming, getting rid of large industrial farms that rely on pesticides.

Harte said curbing continued climate change has two natural solutions: the wind and the sun. He said expanding wind and solar farms combined with greater efficiency in electricity use is entirely possible.

“Germany is much less sunny than most of the United States, and they’re approaching almost half of all electricity production from renewables,” Harte said. “There’s no reason we can’t too.”

Underlying all this, the two say, is a fundamental shift in people’s values, including a turn away from everything being driven by financial interests. Instead, they write, society's focus should shift to “resilience, a striving for virtue, equitable distribution, and extreme vigilance to insure that governance is working in parallel, not in opposition, to achieve these goals.”

In other words, a revolution.

Ehrlich and Harte are optimistic about the solutions. But when it comes to the full-scale revolution, not so much.

“U.S. Congress is ruled by a majority that doesn’t want to listen to facts…. Most don’t believe in science,” Harte said. “They don’t understand the magnitude of the threat civilization is facing.

“If they listened to engineers and scientists and did the right thing, I’d be optimistic. There are solutions out there.”

Tags: , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

25 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 309188969213608@facebook.com' Learning The Truth says:

    Follow Us to Learn The Hidden Truth !!

  2. 1151435211550154@facebook.com' Grimnir Yggr Hildolfr says:

    Lots of GMOs

  3. 10153571059887915@facebook.com' Iris Figueroa says:

    A war waged against nature for money. I wonder how long it’ll take mankind to realize that money is of no use if there is no life left on the planet.

  4. 181909472007593@facebook.com' The Law of Attraction/ The Secret says:

    If you’re constantly having to wonder where you stand with someone, maybe its time to stop standing and start walking.

  5. 10154102946202785@facebook.com' Jim Franklin says:

    If American politicians would STOP paying farmers not to plant,
    we would have less of a problem.

  6. 1480159615616913@facebook.com' Rachel L Rhodes says:

    Community gardens. Let’s teach our youth to plant early.

  7. 10203187819334690@facebook.com' Lise Boucher says:

    We need to go back to the old ways… the way our great grandparents raised food.

  8. Anonymous says:

    This sounds like the new Monsanto ad campaign…

  9. 10207156992824196@facebook.com' Ronnie Proudfoot says:

    The earth has more vacant land then occupied and technology has proven food can be grown anywhere.

    In one hundred years most people will be dead and the over population is a non issue except for the land owners who want to keep the majority of resources for themselfs.

  10. 1026318950721108@facebook.com' William Browatzke says:

    i short people are not going to over populate this world when we start to share the wealth of food and things the birth rates will slow but first we need to stop betting on crops to fail and other such stupid shit make it easier for farms to grow healthy fooods stop growing food for animals and we have more than 2 times enough land to feed all people !

  11. 10203418394620226@facebook.com' Russ Ridlington says:

    We as a species need to control our population. No child should be born without a strong desire to reproduce and have the ability to care for the child.

  12. 859809090764496@facebook.com' Jemar Pamat Espera says:

    30 billion dollar a year of black budget for advance research and weaponry is enough to eradicate poverty.

  13. 10155924829940346@facebook.com' Spencer James Smith says:

    Conscious life news.. You are bought. Who did you receive money from to spew this crap about climate change?

  14. 10155924829940346@facebook.com' Spencer James Smith says:

    This article is bull crap

  15. 10153607988649548@facebook.com' Patricia McCarthy says:

    Yes that is lack of breeding!!!! stop breeding so much!!!

  16. 1121739444510139@facebook.com' Eduardo Salazar says:

    Kill the poor

  17. 10207351144805288@facebook.com' Zach Mckinney says:

    We food our food to cows owned by rich people.

  18. 10207217165212561@facebook.com' Irene Tomazos says:

    Talk about conditioning the mind! What bull is this? What? Scare people into thinking we don’t have enough to justify the killing of people?

  19. 979499052089832@facebook.com' Angela Mumford says:

    People.can feed themselves…we don’t have to grow stuff to feed other people… That’s to do with trade….

  20. 1046362165374071@facebook.com' Jared Ó Súilleabháin says:

    lol hidden truth what a donkey teethed dumb ass lmao, nature has a plan for us all, newtons 3rd law applies here we have acted out at nature and continue to do so every day and so nature is reacting with disease and an accelerated decent into our next iceage

  21. 10153511611514513@facebook.com' Chris Jolly says:

    Or, like, we could just stop eating animals …we already produce enough food to feed 11 billion people. We just feed it to livestock instead

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend