The Earth vs. Monsanto

Written by on May 14, 2014 in Hazards, Issues & Diseases, Health with 0 Comments

Peter Linebaugh | Counterpunch | May 14th 2014

monsanto gmoHere are a few brief notes about A People’s Hearing, held on 10 May 2014, in Greene County, Ohio, The Indivisible Living Entity of the Planet Earth v. Monsanto Corporation, Defendant.

The hearing was the fourth in a series that began two and half years ago in Carbondale, Illinois, followed by a second (Iowa City, Iowa), and a third in St. Louis (Missouri).  They were organized by the Midwest Radical Cultural Corridor, renamed the Compass Collective.  This 4th hearing was held in conjunction with the Herndon Gallery of Antioch College which provided food, rooms, and welcome hospitality.  The Compass collective invites those interested in future hearings to contact them at:monsanto.hearings@gmail.com

The hearing took place in the Clifton Reserve, a few miles from Yellow Springs, Ohio, (the site of Antioch College), and a few feet from the banks of the Little Miami River, one of three rivers (Scioto and Muskingum being the others) draining to the Ohio River which itself flows into the Mississippi River.  It was up these rivers that the Adena people of central America brought the first corn seeds a thousand years ago.

After the U.S.A. was constituted in 1787 this region was the site of aggressive wars of territorial acquisition and genocidal attack on the indigenous people.  The indigenous peoples led by Little Turtle and Blue Jacket at first and for several years meted out continuous defeats upon the U.S.A. Furthermore the Ohio rivers provided the route of escape for people fleeing the racist enclosures of the plantation system to the south of the Ohio river.

Those testifying at the hearing became cognizant of some victories against imperialism, enclosure, and war in an astonishing conclusion to the hearing.


Sarah Lewison, styled the People’s Advocate, opened the hearing, in front of cameras and video equipment, witnesses, consumers, farmers, artists, and students.  She reminded us that this was not yet a trial, but an open meeting to gather testimony.  She likened it to a form of “play.”  Indeed, a visiting artist from Chicago, an Aztec, acted as bailiff swearing people to tell the truth.  Four judges were empanelled, a writer and theorist from the Compass Collective, an Afghan artist from Oakland, California, the director of the Urban Food Freedom Project in Dayton, Ohio, and finally, a professor from the University of Dayton.  Throughout the day the judges role was to listen (“gigantic ears”) and occasionally to ask questions.

In her opening the People’s Advocate reminded all present that Monsanto has more than $17 billion in assets and an annual revenue exceeding $10 billion.  The money buys public relations and government officials.  “We do not appeal to the existing statutory or common law currently organized in favor of large corporations.  We invoke the form of a hearing to produce a comprehensive public understanding of harms and to determine responsibility for those harms.”

An environmental lawyer from nearby Dayton described the pollution of the Miami valley aquifer and the nullity of efforts to use the law as a remedy.  From his practice he reached the conclusion that environmental laws are only as good as the “politics” of those regulating and enforcing them.  He explained “regulatory capture.”

A “people’s remembrancer” spoke next and charged the Monsanto corporation only with theft.  Since questions of law had been introduced he explained that in addition to “higher law,” “natural law,” and “universal law,” that we needed to bring up to date some ancient law and custom because these were the basis of the practice of commoning that preceded the privatization or enclosure of land and the historic antecedents to Monsanto’s enclosure of the common germplasm.

A mom and “risk manager” from north western Ohio, spoke of rights- based organizing, and using municipal ordinances and notions of local sovereignty to protect the earth and human communities from being drilled, fracked, and mined.

Another witness provided an anthropological perspective demonstrating that genetically modified organisms are a colonial project.  She showed that the concepts of “poverty” and “development” originated in the Truman administration.  She recommended that we consider Arundhati Roy’s book, The Ghost of Capitalism.

An organic farmer, advocate against GMOs provided 1) a detailed chronology beginning in 1987 of world-wide direct action by the Raging Diggers and diggers of other kinds against GMO plants, corn and soy particularly, 2) a denunciation of the “revolving door” between the agencies of government and the agents of profiteering, and 3) an argument of identification between the genetic code and the legal code.   The parallel between Monsanto and the U.S.A. with I.G. Farben and the German Third Reich was introduced into the discussion.

A witness from Ohio State University, a horticulturalist and crop scientist, spoke of transgenetic escape from sunflowers.  He spoke of GMO crops creating superweeds.  He demonstrated the utter unsustainability of industrial agriculture.  He advocated poly-agriculture that maximizes options of genetic diversity.  He reminded us that humans cannot manufacture topsoil.  It takes 500 years to create 1 inch of it.

A seed cleaner from Indiana spoke of his suit against Monsanto, of Monsanto’s surreptitious surveillance of farmers, he reminded us that the corn germplasm is a public good – “it belongs to us” – and cited Abraham Lincoln’s the Morrill Act of 1862.  “The light of the sun shines everywhere,” he argued for the labeling of GMO foods.  Breast milk can become poisoned.  He concluded by shouting “stop, thief!”

Another witness urged us to consider God as the creator of life and recited a bunch of different religions saying so.  Life is the first cause.  Even bio-scientists, she said, considered recombinant DNA to be a chimera, or monster.

The owner of a local health food store provided distressing testimony that corporate food giants such as Whole Foods or Krogers make investments in apparently “organic” food companies as a way of capturing the market in healthy foods.  Her research consists of personal visits to corporate retailers with onsite inspection and time-consuming work on the internet and the telephone.  Universities and government were no longer a trustworthy source of knowledge independent of the influence of profiteers.

[read full post here]

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend