Drone Report: US Must Account for ‘Turning Wedding Into a Funeral’

Posted by on February 20, 2014 in Government, Military with 0 Comments

Sarah Lazare | Commondreams | Feb 20th 2014

Abdullah Muhammad al-Tisi of Yakla holds a photo of his son Ali Abdullah Mohammed al-Tisi, who was killed in a US drone strike outside Rad`a, Yemen on December 12, 2013. (Photo: Human Rights Watch)

Abdullah Muhammad al-Tisi of Yakla holds a photo of his son Ali Abdullah Mohammed al-Tisi, who was killed in a US drone strike outside Rad`a, Yemen on December 12, 2013. (Photo: Human Rights Watch)

A U.S. drone strike on a recent wedding procession in Yemen — that left 12 people dead and at least 15 wounded — raises serious doubts about the Obama administration’s claim that so-called targeted killings do not harm civilians, charged Human Rights Watch in a reportreleased Thursday.

Entitled A Wedding That Became a Funeral: US Drone Attack on Marriage Procession in Yemen, the 28-page report demands that the U.S. government investigate the incident and publicly account for any slaughter of civilians or violation of international law.

“The U.S. refusal to explain a deadly attack on a marriage procession raises critical questions about the administration’s compliance with its own targeted killing policy,” said Letta Tayler, senior terrorism and counterterrorism researcher at Human Rights Watch and author of the report. “All Yemenis, especially the families of the dead and wounded, deserve to know why this wedding procession became a funeral.”

The report decribes in harrowing detail the December 12th, 2013 launch of four hellfire missiles at a wedding procession near the city of Rad’a.

“Blood was everywhere, the bodies of the people who were killed and injured were scattered everywhere,” testified Abdullah Muhammad al-Tisi, a local sheikh, who was injured and lost his son Ali Abdullah, a 36-year-old father of three, in the attack. “I saw the missile hit the car that was just behind the car driven by my son. I went there to check on my son. I found him tossed to the side. I turned him over and he was dead. He was struck in his face, neck, and chest. My son, Ali!”

U.S. and Yemeni officials have claimed that the attack killed “militants,” and the U.S. government has refused to provide any explanation or evidence.

Yet, numerous witnesses to the attack and relatives of the deceased told HRW that the dead were civilians. According to the report, Yemeni authorities later tacitly acknowledged this. “After the attack, angry residents blocked a main road in Rad`a, a provincial capital in central Yemen, while displaying the bodies of those killed,” the report reads. “Provincial authorities then unofficially acknowledged civilian casualties by providing money and assault rifles—a traditional gesture of apology—to the families of the dead and wounded.”

The report adds to the crescendo of voices from within Yemen and across the world warning of the high civilian death rates caused by U.S. drone strikes — a toll that is well-documented, despite Obama’s repeated denials. Many have gone a step further than HRW by demanding an immediate halt to U.S. covert drone strikes, in light of the death, trauma, and injury they spread.

“Whatever we do, they [the US] will never look at us as human beings,” said the mother of Aref al-Taysi, who was killed in the attack on the wedding procession, in a January interviewwith Al Jazeera English reporter Rooj Alwazir. “We wear wounds they can’t see.”


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Tags: , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend