Thrive II Preview

Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project

Posted by on October 26, 2015 in Environment, Environmental Hazards with 69 Comments

Peter A. Kirby | Activist Post
chemtrails-at-sunset“Discoveries and inventions are not terminals; they are fresh starting points from which we can climb to new knowledge.” – Dr. Willis R. Whitney, founder of General Electric Laboratories 

After so many years of watching airplanes produce the lines in the sky, largely without knowing of what this Project consists or why, we have recently gained an understanding. Evidence suggests that today's chemtrail spraying operations consist of airplanes saturating our atmosphere with nano-sized particles influenced by electromagnetic energy for the purpose of weather modification.

U.S. patent #4,686,605 “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere” shows how stratospheric and tropospheric aerosols can be manipulated using electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. The ground-based antennas (known as ionospheric heaters) needed to produce the appropriate electromagnetic energy exist. For a detailed discussion, please see the author's previous article “Smoking Gun: The HAARP and Chemtrails Connection.” 


The 1996 U.S. military document “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” outlines a program using aerosols sprayed from airplanes which are then manipulated with electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. This document will be discussed shortly. 

The common thread here is weather modification; or as the Library of Congress calls it, “weather control.” Lots of other evidence supporting this assertion exists as well, but these two documents are the most salient. 

Motives are plenty. Most notably, significant direct benefits can be gained by playing financial markets which rise and fall with the weather such as the weather derivatives and catastrophe reinsurance markets; not to mention agricultural and energy commodities. Enron pioneered the markets. With foreknowledge of the weather, so many scams could be concocted that it boggles the mind. Weather routinely changes the course of Human history. It determines what we do every day. It determines the outcomes of wars and influences elections. Control of the weather is God-like power. Money and power junkies want it. 

Controlling Earth's weather would necessarily require a gigantic scientific effort. Oddly enough, when one looks for a National effort in weather modification, one finds a lot. Specifically, if one looks, one can find a history of weather control programs involving electromagnetic energy and atmospheric particles; all in a coherent chronological order. 


This paper is the result of thousands of dollars and countless hours spent researching many thousands of pages of source, organizational and Government documents related to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. This article serves as the foundation for a series of shortly forthcoming articles detailing the history and current state of this Project. May this work help end the spraying. For the fact that these environmental modifications have been done without our informed consent, may this work contribute to the largest class-action lawsuit in history. 

This paper examines the origins and development of this; the first planetary level scientific endeavor. Now is our opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the New Manhattan Project. 

The Origins of Weather Modification 

People have been attempting to modify the weather for ever. Most commonly, man has gone about making it rain; especially in times of drought. The earliest recorded efforts were those of mystics. Local shaman would be called upon to ingest a certain concoction in order to communicate with the weather gods and ask for help. In some cases, the sacrifice of certain animals in certain fashions may have been the thing to do. Sometimes a good old rain dance may have done the trick. 

Some early Western efforts to stop destructive weather are outlined in professor James Fleming's book Fixing the Sky. On page 78 he writes, “In ancient Greece, the official ‘hail wardens' of Cleonae were appointed at public expense to watch for hail and then signal the farmers to offer blood sacrifices to protect their fields: a lamb, a chicken, or even a poor man drawing blood from his finger was deemed sufficient.” 

A little later professor Fleming writes, “In Austria, it was traditional to ring ‘thunder bells' or blow on huge ‘weather horns' while herdsmen set up a terrific howl and women rattled chains and beat milk pails to scare away the destructive spirit of the storm.” 

Much of the early Western attempts at weather modification involved the detonation of explosive charges in the lower atmosphere. It was hypothesized that atmospheric explosions cause precipitation. 

Early American Involvement

Although there has been much international participation, this article focuses on America's participation in the New Manhattan Project. Throughout the development of the New Manhattan Project, America was the world's technological leader; especially in the area of military technology. America led the way and developed most of this Project. America continues to lead the Project today. Therefore the early history of weather modification in America is relevant. 

James Pollard Espy (1785-1860) also known as “The Storm King” was the first meteorologist in U.S. government service. Although he never received Federal funding for it, he suggested that forest fires can produce rainfall and that experiments in this area should be carried out. His magnum opus was a book called The Philosophy of Storms. This book contains a long section entitled “Artificial Rains.” 

The first Federally funded weather modification field effort took place in Texas in 1891, with funds appropriated by the Congress in the amount of nine thousand dollars through the Department of Agriculture. The experiment involved weather modifier Robert St. George Dyrenforth (1844-1910) attacking the atmosphere with balloons, kites, dynamite, mortars, smoke bombs and fireworks. The results were inconclusive, but you can bet that the atmosphere was absolutely terrified! 

From these early efforts until the beginning of the scientific era in 1946, the realm of weather modification was inhabited largely by a motley collection of pseudo-scientists and con artists similar to Dyrenforth. These people, who referred to themselves as “rainmakers,” traveled around the Country (mostly the West), going where local governments were willing to pay for their services. If a certain region was experiencing a severe drought, people were often desperate for solutions. These rainmakers' activities often involved the mixing and open air release of dangerous chemicals. Some of these efforts were Federally funded. Since the days of Robert Dyrenforth, the Federal money has not stopped flowing. 

Nikola Tesla

In the late 1800s, inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) popularized the use of electromagnetic energy. In his 1905 United States patent number 787,412 “Art of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums” Tesla describes how electromagnetic energy may be sent and received through the atmosphere. The Supreme Court found that U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy” proves he invented radio; not Marconi. He pioneered radar. He invented wireless signal and power transmission. Yes, power can be transmitted wirelessly; we'll have more about that later. 

Tesla's musings and scientific discoveries pioneered what are today's ionospheric heaters which use electromagnetic energy to cause atmospheric perturbations from great distances and play a defining role in the New Manhattan Project. Specifically, he pioneered the use of a certain type of electromagnetic energy called extremely-low frequency (ELF). This is a specific type of energy known to be used in the New Manhattan Project; the other being very-low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic energy. 

In her book Tesla: Man Out of Time, Margaret Cheney writes that he did a good deal of theorizing about weather control. She also writes that he theorized that the entire earth might be illuminated by shooting electromagnetic energy 35,000 feet up into the atmosphere. 35,000 feet is about the altitude of today's offending airplanes. 

The Beginning of the Scientific Era

The scientific era of weather modification began famously in 1946 with a trio of scientists from General Electric Laboratories: Irving Langmuir, Vincent Schaefer and Bernard Vonnegut. Leading the group was the world famous Nobel Peace Prize winning scientist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957). This trio popularized the fact that, under certain circumstances, dumping substances from airplanes into clouds causes precipitation. Early experiments used dry ice while later experiments pioneered the use of silver iodide. Also invented were silver iodide generation equipment and many other weather related scientific instruments. Much of this trio's work here was done in cooperation with the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force. Although others had previously dumped stuff out of airplanes in attempts to modify the weather, the G.E. scientists practiced a sound scientific method previously unseen in the field.

Schaefer, Langmuir & Vonnegut
image source: General Electric Laboratories

Following the famous scientific weather modification efforts of the G.E. Labs trio, the public's imagination was sparked and a government regulated weather modification industry flourished. To this day, the government-regulated weather modification industry (or “conventional” weather modification industry as we will call it) expels dry ice, lead iodide or silver iodide (usually silver iodide) from airplanes. 

However, the conventional weather modification industry is distinct from the New Manhattan Project and therefore is not the focus of this article. The New Manhattan Project employs electromagnetic energy to manipulate dispersed particles while conventional weather modifiers do not. Also, conventional weather modification efforts are conducted on a regional basis while the New Manhattan Project is global. 

Not long after the scientific breakthroughs of the G.E. Labs trio, fueled by high level political rhetoric and popular interest, the United States federal government began pouring hundreds of millions of dollars annually into basic atmospheric research. Since then, the United States government is admitted to have spent many tens of billions of dollars on weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. Much of that was expended in 1950s, '60s and '70s dollars. If one is to control the weather, one must know how the atmosphere works. Or as geoengineer Dr. Clement J. Todd wrote in 1970, “Our ability to manage precipitation depends upon four factors: (1) understanding the physical processes of the atmosphere, (2) real-time knowledge of the weather we wish to manipulate, (3) devising the optimum treatment material and technique, and (4) delivery of that treatment to the cloud where and when we wish.” 

The majority of the vast expanses of literature pertaining to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences is geared towards conventional weather modification. However, both the New Manhattan Project and conventional weather modification are supported by basic atmospheric research. So, buried in this body of literature, one may find glimpses of the New Manhattan Project. The rest of this paper recounts these glimpses. 

Bernard Vonnegut

One member of the G.E. Labs trio, Bernard Vonnegut (1914-1997) went on to pioneer weather modification research involving the use of artificial electric charges and atmospheric aerosols. His work in this area was performed under Government contracts outsourced to a research and development firm called Arthur D. Little Inc.

Bernard Vonnegut
image source: Life Magazine

The earliest recorded instances of electricity being intentionally used to modify particles in the atmosphere can be found in the 1884 experiments of Sir Oliver Lodge (1851-1940). The 1918 U.S. patent #1,279,823 “Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere” by J.G. Balsillie built upon Lodge's work. Using this knowledge as a basis, Mr. Vonnegut resumed Lodge's work; this time with massive funding and modernized scientific equipment. 

Beginning in 1953, Bernard Vonnegut, Arthur D. Little et al., conducted experiments involving stainless steel wires miles long strung from the tops of telephone poles, connected to a power supply and discharging corona. The coronal discharge's effect upon ambient aerosols and the clouds above was monitored and analyzed. Through 1961, these experiments were carried out in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Texas, Illinois and New Mexico. These types of experiments are referred to as “space charge” experiments. The U.S. Signal Corps and the U. S. Coast Guard provided support. Others performed similar experiments.

Space charge experiment
image source: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The 1958 “Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Control” contained an article by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready titled “The Future.” In it they outline an atmosphere saturated with “chemicals” and “altering” atmospheric electrical variables. It reads: 

When the nature of thunderstorm electrification is understood it may prove possible to control this process by the introduction of chemicals into the atmosphere or by altering electrical variables. Such variables might be atmospheric conductivity, field, and space charge, or perhaps the corona giving properties of the earth's surface. 

When we become sufficiently sophisticated concerning the dynamics of the atmosphere it is possible that weather may be controlled by the large scale release of chemical or more probably thermonuclear heat energy.

In 1961, Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett wrote a paper for Arthur D. Little titled “Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols.” This was a report about their experiments of the previous 3 months involving the effects of electromagnetic energy upon a grounded sphere in a small chamber surrounded by gas. Please consider the implications of that. We will revisit this paper much later. 

If you are wondering… yes, Bernard Vonnegut was related to the novelist Kurt Vonnegut. They were brothers. 

*** 

In 1958 the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the weather” by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area. 

*** 

The Department of Commerce Weather Bureau reported in 1960 that they were conducting a weather modification study in which, “Chemicals are introduced into the cloud which noticeably changes the surface tension of the droplets. Electrification effects are being observed by artificially electrifying the droplets and subjecting them to impressed electric fields.” 

*** 

For better or for worse, this super secret program had a prophet. His name was United States Navy Admiral William Francis Raborn (1905-1990).

William Francis Raborn 
image source: United States Navy

In the January 1963 edition of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Admiral Raborn outlined a program using electromagnetic energy to modify the weather. His article was entitled “New Horizons of Naval Research and Development.” In this paper, underneath the heading of ‘Environmental Warfare' he wrote: 

The possibilities for the military employment of the “weather weapon” may be as diverse as they are numerous. An ability to control the weather could introduce greater changes in warfare than those which occurred in 1945 with the explosion of the first nuclear weapons.

A severe storm or hurricane striking a naval force may well inflict greater damage than could an enemy. The capability to change the direction of destructive storms and guide them toward enemy concentrations may exist in the future arsenal of the naval tactical commander. 

Ground, sea, air and amphibious operations might be supported by the dissipation of fog or clouds, or by the production of rain or drought. Conversely, the creation of solid, low overcasts might be used to conceal troop concentrations, movements, and task force deployments. Large-scale weather control techniques might be used to cause extensive flooding in strategic areas or even to bring a new “ice age” upon the enemy. By influencing the ionosphere and atmosphere simultaneously, magnetic, acoustic, and pressure effects might be generated in such a way that ocean-wide sweeping of mines would occur. 

Creating or dissipating atmospheric temperature/humidity ducts might modify the refractive index of the atmosphere enough to influence radar or radio transmission. Artificially-induced ionospheric storms might produce a blackout of communications. 

Certain electromagnetic waves are unable to pass through an area of precipitation. A cloud seeding generator could be employed under appropriate meteorological conditions to produce precipitation that would interfere with the operation of radio-guided or remotely-controlled devices or vehicles. We already have taken our first steps toward developing an environmental warfare capability. We are using satellite weather data from Tiros II for current, tactical operations and more accurate, long-range weather predictions. Some experiments in fog dissipation have shown promise, and some exploratory research has been conducted on ways to change the heading of major storms. 

For these reasons – and because our advances in science make it reasonable – we are now engaged in planning a ten-year, comprehensive study of the atmosphere, a study which we will designate ATMOS. This plan will be co-ordinated with our TENOC oceanographic studies.

About the ATMOS program, the author has failed to find any other significant information. The author has looked over a 1961 report pertaining to the Navy TENOC (Ten Year Program in Oceanography) program. Although it did not contain any specific information pertinent to the New Manhattan Project, it did make mention of another, classified TENOC report. 

It is notable that the title of Raborn's article includes the word “horizon” because the type of electromagnetic energy to which he refers is akin to “over the horizon radar.” This type of radar is called “over the horizon” because it is bounced off the ionosphere and therefore is effective far beyond the range of the forty miles or so (depending on terrain) afforded by previous radar systems. Forty miles is approximately the distance one can see over flat land or sea before the curvature of the Earth obscures points beyond. Over the horizon radar, on the other hand, is effective to thousands of miles. Today's ionospheric heaters evolved as over the horizon radar. 

Also of note is the fact that the United States Navy, of which Mr. Raborn was an admiral, is today one of the managers of the HAARP facility in Alaska. The HAARP facility contains the world's most powerful ionospheric heater which is documented to be able to modify the weather. 

*** 

In the 1967 National Science Foundation's ninth annual weather modification report, it reads, “ESSA [Environmental Science Services Administration] is also investigating the effect of cirrus clouds on the radiation budget of the atmosphere by studying aircraft-produced contrails which often spread into cirrus layers covering considerable fractions of the sky. One technique proposed for modifying lower cloud development has been the generation of a high level cirrus deck with jet aircraft. By intercepting solar radiation at high altitude it may be possible to influence larger scale cloud development elsewhere by reducing solar input and reducing convective cloud generation in areas where they are not needed.” This is essentially today's geoengineering thesis. 

A little later in that same report, it reads that their computer atmospheric simulations, or ‘models' as they call them, might simulate, “…producing high-level cirrus cloud cover over an area by means of jet aircraft, inserting particulate matter into the upper atmosphere to alter the solar radiation balance and the like.” 

*** 

In 1966, the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification produced a document titled “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification.” On page 17 of this report, it reads, “It is anticipated that there will be a few large-scale facilities funded for the testing of modification schemes. Typical schemes might be the suspension of a spray nozzle over a valley between two mountain peaks to produce cloud-sized droplets into which electrical charges can be introduced in either polarity, contaminants can be introduced, and the drop size spectrum can be adjusted to any reasonable distribution.” The Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences subsequently agreed to proceed with the development of a National Weather Modification Program along the lines of this report. 

The now defunct Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) was created by the Federal Council for Science and Technology in 1959 in order to oversee and coordinate a wide range of basic atmospheric research originating from many previously disparate government offices. Their focus was weather modification. Members of the ICAS included the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Interior, Transportation and State as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. These are the government agencies which have been involved in weather modification all along. 

The ICAS produced a series of semi-annual reports between 1960 and 1978. In these reports, ICAS member organizations' weather related scientific activities and expenditures were recounted. The ICAS reports' areas of study included: Earth's natural geomagnetic energy, different ways clouds form and different ways they precipitate, lightning, hurricanes and other extreme weather, inadvertent weather modification, intentional weather modification and extra-planetary atmospheres. The ICAS is duly noted here because so much of the history of the New Manhattan Project is accounted for in the pages of their reports. 

In the 1969 ICAS report, under the heading of “Cloud Electricity Modification,” it is written that the National Science Foundation is developing, “Means for injecting significant quantities of charge artificially into clouds…” 

Again in this 1969 report, on page 37 it describes the Army's intentions in the area of weather modification. It reads, “Studies will continue on upper atmospheric structure and dynamics, lasers and other electromagnetic propagation, and acoustic propagation. New approaches to atmospheric modification will be studied.” 

On page 42 of the 1971 ICAS special report “A National Program for Accelerating Progress in Weather Modification,” the authors write of fog being cleared by airplanes releasing chemicals and ‘electrical methods' of fog dissipation. 

On page 79 of the 1973 ICAS report, it is written, “There is a great deal to be learned before we can with confidence say what effect can be produced by the injection of chemically active trace gasses and particulates into the lower stratosphere. New emphasis has been given to both dynamical and physical meteorological research relevant to this question.” 

*** 

United States patent #5,003,186 “Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming” was filed by the Hughes Aircraft Corporation in 1991. The patent describes a method for dispersing particulates into the upper atmosphere in order to save us from global warming. The author David B. Chang suggests that aluminum oxide be used for this purpose. Lab tests from around the world have shown aluminum to be the number one chemtrail ingredient. 

“One proposed solution to the problem of global warming,” it reads, “involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude.” 

The first mention of aluminum occurs in this passage, “The method comprises the step of seeding the greenhouse gas layer with a quantity of tiny particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity or reflectivity, in that said materials have high emissivities in the visible and far infrared wavelength region. Such materials can include the class of materials known as Welsbach materials. The oxides of metal, e.g., aluminum oxide, are also suitable for the purpose.” 

The second mention of aluminum occurs a little later. It reads, “Another class of materials having the desired property includes the oxides of metals. For example, aluminum oxide (Al2O3) is one metal oxide suitable for the purpose and which is relatively inexpensive.” 

The Hughes Aircraft Corporation was acquired by and is now integrated into Raytheon. 

*** 

A 1994 document produced by Stanford Research International called “Multiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Arecibo” details three barium releases of 48 kilograms each over Puerto Rico. The barium clouds produced by these rocket-borne explosions were subsequently hit with man-made electromagnetic energy from an ionospheric heater and thus turned into a plasma. Barium has been found to be the number two chemtrail ingredient. 

*** 

In 1996 the Air Force produced a previously mentioned document called “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” The document was produced by the Department of Defense and written as ordered by the chief of staff of the Air Force, Ronald R. Fogleman. “Owning the Weather” was but one in a series of 39 documents speaking to a great overhaul of Air Force operations to be achieved by the year 2025. The larger set of documents is called “Air Force 2025.” “Owning the Weather” describes a system of weather modification combining atmospheric aerosols with electromagnetic energy. 

On page 2 the document reads, “Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy's capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission.” 

The document mostly speaks to military combat applications, but there are some very interesting quotes. Here's one, “In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications.” Let's hear more about those “domestic applications” 

On page 34 the document reads, “The ability to modify the weather may be desirable both for economic and defense reasons.” 

Also in 1996, as part of the same series containing “Owning the Weather,” the Air Force produced a document entitled “An Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025” which briefly outlines something they call a “weather analysis and modification system.” This system is described as employing both particulate seeding and microwave energy for the purpose of weather modification. 

Under the heading of “Weather Analysis and Modification System,” the document reads, “A global network of sensors provides ‘weather warriors' with the means to monitor and accurately predict weather activities and their effects on military operations. A diverse set of weather modification tools allows manipulation of small-to-medium scale weather phenomena to enhance friendly force capabilities and degrade those of the adversary.” 

*** 

In the mid-nineties, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories scientists Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde wrote a series of papers calling for the spraying of megatons of aluminum to save us from global warming. The mid-nineties was when reports of chemtrail spraying in American skies began pouring in. If you will recall, aluminum has been found to be the number one chemtrail ingredient. 

In their 1997 paper “Global Warming and Ice Ages,” the Livermore Labs trio wrote, “It has been suggested that alumina injected into the stratosphere by the exhaust of solid-rocket motors might scatter non-negligible amounts of sunlight. We expect that introduction of scattering-optimized alumina particles into the stratosphere may well be overall competitive with use of sulfur oxides; alumina particles offer a distinctly different environmental impact profile.”

They continue to espouse the virtues of stratospheric alumina in the footnotes writing, “Alumina, like sulfate, is ubiquitous in the terrestrial biosphere, and its stratospheric injection seemingly poses no significant environment issues.” 

In conclusion 

So there you have an evolutionary history of a project employing sprayed particles and the electrification of clouds for the purpose of weather modification. Is this a coincidence? Are all these examples simply isolated, one-off events not a part of a larger overall plan? What are the odds of these data points evolving in a chronological order such as they have without being part of a coordinated effort? One may be looking at something like a quadrillion to one; and that is conservative. 

For five days only, from Thursday, February 19 through Monday, February 23, my ebookChemtrails Exposed will be available for free from Amazon.  

Stay tuned. God willing, this article is only the first of many coming in this year; 2015. The heavy lifting (studying the history of weather modification) is complete. The next papers will come much easier because they involve smaller topics and half or more of the work on each is already done. Although the topic will remain secret until publication, you can expect the next article in a couple of months, possibly sooner. Until then, keep firing in the information war. Thank you. 

Notes:

Adventure into the Unknown: the first 50 years of the General Electric Research Laboratory by Laurence A. Hawkins, published by William Morrow & Company, 1950 

U.S. patent #4,686,605 “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,” 1987 

“Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” by Col. Tamzy J. House, Lt. Col. James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj. Ronald J. Celentano, Maj. David M. Husband, Maj. Ann E. Mercer and Maj. James E. Pugh, published by the United States Air Force, 1996 

The Smartest Guys in the Room by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind, published by the Penguin Group, 2004 

The Weather Changers by D.S. Halacy, Jr., published by Harper and Row, 1968 

Fixing the Sky by James Roger Fleming, published by Columbia University Press, 2010 

U.S. patent #787,412 “Art of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums,” 1905 

U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy,” 1900 

Tesla: Man Out of Time by Margaret Cheney, published by Simon & Schuster, 1981 

Early History of Cloud Seeding by Barrington S. Havens, published by the Langmuir Laboratory at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at the State University of New York at Albany and the Research and Development Center of the General Electric Company, 1978 

Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports 1960-1978, published by the Federal Council for Science and Technology 

“Department of the Interior Program in Precipitation Management for 1970” by Dr. Clement J. Todd as it appeared in the “Proceedings of the Twelfth Interagency Conference on Weather Modification” 1970 

U.S. patent #1,279,823 “Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere” 

“Technique for Introducing Low-Density Space Charge into the Atmosphere” by B. Vonnegut, K. Maynard, W.G. Sykes and C.B. Moore, published by Arthur D. Little and the Journal of Geophysical Research, volume 66, number 3, March, 1961 

“The Future” by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready, published in the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Control, p201, 1958 

Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols by Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett, published by Arthur D. Little, 1961 

Angels Don't Play this HAARP: advances in Tesla technology by Jeane Manning and Dr. Nick Begich, published by Earthpulse Press, p78, 1995 

1st National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, p14, 1960 

“New Horizons of Naval Research and Development” by William Francis Raborn, published in U.S.Naval Institute Proceedings, January, 1963 

“Ten Year Program in Oceanography: TENOC” by the U.S. Navy, March 13, 1961 

9th National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, 1967 

“Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966 

Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences memorandum to Homer E. Newell dated June 21, 1966, as it appeared in the appendix to “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966 

“The Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences: A Case History” by Robert E. Morrison 

U.S. patent #5,003,186 “Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming,” 1991 

“Multiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Arecibo” by Stanford Research International, published by Stanford Research International, 1994 

“Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996 

“An Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force as part of “Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996 

Global Warming and Ice Ages by Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde, published by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1997 

Websites: 

worldcat.org 
amazon.com 
abebooks.com 
google.com/patents 
airforce.com 
navy.mil 
ge.com 
weathermodification.org 
adlittle.com 
signal.army.mil 
uscg.mil 
commerce.gov 
nsf.gov 
noaa.gov 
whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/nstc 
usda.gov 
defense.gov 
doi.gov 
dot.gov 
state.gov 
epa.gov 
energy.gov 
nasa.gov 
raytheon.com 
sri.com 
llnl.gov 
aircrap.org 
globalskywatch.com 

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA author and activist. Check out the newly updated and expanded edition of his ebook Chemtrails Exposed. It's still only 99¢, but not for long. 

More from Activistpost

Tags: , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

69 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. garyerichardson@gmail.com' Rabula Publice says:

    “Barium has been found to be the number two chemtrail ingredient.”—source?
    “The mid-nineties was when reports of chemtrail spraying in American skies began pouring in. If you will recall, aluminum has been found to be the number one chemtrail ingredient. “—source?

  2. peterakirby@yahoo.com' Peter A. Kirby says:

    The source of the barium and aluminum are the chemtrail spraying planes, duh!

    As to your other demand, many sources began reporting chemtrail operations in the mid-nineties, such as those that appear in William Thomas’ excellent book ‘Chemtrails Confirmed.’

    Are you ready to come to grips with reality now? I have a feeling you are not a robot, at least.

  3. abozak@telus.net' Anne says:

    Actually, chemtrails was heavily dropped and researched over Alberta, Canada by USA starting from 1975 onwards. Our skies were full of it. Of course the media did not acknowledge this and any further questioning of our provincial government was met with silence. Wonder how much the USA paid certain Alberta politicos for their silence and compliance.
    Everything that the US Airforce further proposed to have functional and operating by the year 2025, has actually been occurring and functioning daily since about 2012. Now, about certain earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts, floods, storms, etc., here there and everywhere Globally …..

  4. scottfigus@mailinator.com' Scott says:

    It’s always fascinating to read these write-ups on aerial application of chemical agents. Speculation always runs rampant and truth be told, the higher ups are the only ones who hold these secrets. They only thing I know for certain are what I have witnessed first hand.
    As far as you are concerned my name is Scott (actual name withheld for obvious reasons) I have worked as an aircraft mechanic (A&P) for several years. I started working on smaller general aviation aircraft for a few years gradually working my up to the larger airliners. Before I left maintenance to pursue a pilot career I was a line maintenance technician for a major reputable airline. In that position I performed limited maintenance tasked that only amounted to R&R (remove and replace). Very rarely did I see any equipment that would leave me to believe in the chemtrail phenomenon. Up until a few years ago I was what you would call a “non-believer”.
    Fast forward to this previous year where I was hired as a pilot at the aviation department at a large corporate firm. We specialize in the transport of our executives as well as other VIP loyal to the company.
    THIS IS WHERE THINGS GET INTERESTING.
    Several of our aircraft had a separate system that was set apart from all the other hydraulic, ecs, or electrical systems, controlled by a small panel on the co-pilots side. This system was labeled simply as “atmospherics”. I was never a part of ground school or the check rides that followed, and never on any in flight checklist. It was only on IOE (initial operating experience) that it became my job, upon request of the captain, to activate the system above FL300 (30,000ft MSL). A loose lipped captain once explained that at that altitude the “agent” was masked by the vapor exhaust from the engines – the natural reaction of the burning of jet fuel at high altitudes. After about 6 months of flying for this company I’ve kept quiet, but there has been an increase in the use of this aerial agent and I feel like this information has to be leaked some how.

  5. 10153805164668694@facebook.com' Racheal Johnson says:

    How else would they be able to tell us exactly when flu season is…..because they spray it in the air.

    • 1039481026061964@facebook.com' Alex Crofford says:

      “Flu season” is simply a time when the temperature goes down and peoples immune system has to work harder to stay warm. So if anyone is predisposed to an opportunistic bacterial or virus; your system may not be able to fight against it optimally. I hope that answered your question. By the way, great smile.

    • 10153805164668694@facebook.com' Racheal Johnson says:

      Thanks for the info ..I know that because I work in the medical field as a Dietitian. I’m also a conspiracy theorist as well…and thanks for the compliment!

    • 10153805164668694@facebook.com' Racheal Johnson says:

      the purpose of this video is to make us aware that the chemical trails are causing us to get sick from germs that are being sprayed in the air.

    • Nydrew@gmail.com' Mr. Concerned says:

      Yep!
      My coworkers start “hacking” and sniffing days after a spray. Then, they all walk around saying, “yeah, I caught this bug again”.

      Sheeple!

      • abozak@telus.net' Ann says:

        I live up here in Alberta, Canada and your American chemtrail planes are really doing a big number on us lately. I am getting GIGANTIC 3 day MIGRAINES from the newest and latest concoction they are spraying on us. Something has changed about the chemicals they are spraying on us. Insert your own “adjective” here.

  6. 409782735883183@facebook.com' Marsha Creary says:

    The 1996 U.S. military document “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” outlines a program using aerosols sprayed from airplanes which are then manipulated with electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. This document will be discussed shortly.

    The common thread here is weather modification; or as the Library of Congress calls it, “weather control.” Lots of other evidence supporting this assertion exists as well, but these two documents are the most salient.

    Motives are plenty. Most notably, significant direct benefits can be gained by playing financial markets which rise and fall with the weather such as the weather derivatives and catastrophe reinsurance markets; not to mention agricultural and energy commodities. Enron pioneered the markets. With foreknowledge of the weather, so many scams could be concocted that it boggles the mind. Weather routinely changes the course of Human history. It determines what we do every day. It determines the outcomes of wars and influences elections. Control of the weather is God-like power. Money and power junkies want it.”

    This is what chem trails are for? I can’t lie I’ve seen them and wondered what they were but never could have imagined that’s what they were for

  7. 405022926370532@facebook.com' Arlene Messina says:

    Shortly after seeing a small ct,my eye’s started to itch & my nose got clogged & my breathing got short.

  8. 10153058601836105@facebook.com' Kristian Lewin says:

    Conspiracy theorists at it again. Chemtrails are commercial airlines. Not everything in the world is out to get you

    • 977364782286250@facebook.com' Will Smith says:

      Open up your eyes

    • 10208131429469524@facebook.com' Nancy Hazlett says:

      Come on, Contrail are up high and disapate a few minutes later. Chemtrails or Geoengineering, which they admit they are doing, is lower and full of aluminum and barium and other chemicals and they even have experimented with aerosol vaccines. One would have to be blind to not see the sky after they have done a checkerboard design and think that is contrails…they spread out and make it hazy and I grew up with contrails in the sky, never did that what these geoengineering fools are doing now.

    • 10153706996188781@facebook.com' Calvaire Shiftens says:

      It’s an attention thing with folks like Kristian. Stroking their own low brow egos. Minds like a box — “Boring and fixed.”

      Awesome article (long but well researched and informative)

    • 409782735883183@facebook.com' Marsha Creary says:

      I’m guessing that Kristian hasnt seen a true chemtrail. It actually struck me when I saw him due to the fact that unlike a trail left by commercial and even noncommercial planes, the trail hung suspended in the air long after the plane was out of site. The characteristics of the trail were more dense, covered a larger area and hung there much longer than a regular trail. You will know the difference when you see it

    • 409782735883183@facebook.com' Marsha Creary says:

      Get educated

    • 10206333711596367@facebook.com' Paul Bennett says:

      I totally agree Kristian, politicians and government types being blamed for this breath the same air as all us poor plebs

    • 607854869356646@facebook.com' Sam Grimshaw says:

      Grew up in the 80s, I have noticed no difference in time duration of trails in the sky. That’s not to say chemtrails are a hoax, but building a theory based on that alone is pretty fucking dumb.

    • 10153859467324728@facebook.com' Nagual Prezident says:

      So why werent they causing the same trails and changing clouds and causing people to have skin and lung conditions, boosting humidity and blocking the sun, our greatest beneficiary when we were kids? As a matter of fact ur probably an agent, dont answer that question.

    • 10153859467324728@facebook.com' Nagual Prezident says:

      And if u are not but just from a place where they dont have them, come to ny and u will see

    • 935921896501953@facebook.com' Jacob Garza says:

      The Shasta Decision: Climate Geoengineering Chemt…: https://youtu.be/1TM0N-w038I

    • 10153292637932862@facebook.com' Nathan Crabtree says:

      Ever thought it could just be good old fashioned regular pollution causing them problems??

    • 1497270893900109@facebook.com' Being Jabari Jones says:

      How much do they pay u

    • 1659763854308252@facebook.com' Bill Armstrong says:

      The underlying theme you morons display is a conviction that you have special knowledge or insight. You don’t.

    • 10205228245001367@facebook.com' Anthony Spears says:

      How do you know that contrails dissipate quickly, and chemtrails are long and persistent? How have you made that determination?

  9. 10206045713960306@facebook.com' Thomas Chenhall says:

    It’s real. Operation Indigo Skyfold.

    So was the 9/11 false flag attack: Operation Romero

    It’s a race to kill the earth and force us to leave for other earths, force us into specific GMOs, resistant to their powders.

    I know it’s evil, but that’s only two evil things “they” have decided to do with our taxpayer money. There are actually five.

    • 1039481026061964@facebook.com' Alex Crofford says:

      If that is true how are we going to get past the Vanallen radiation belts?

    • 10206045713960306@facebook.com' Thomas Chenhall says:

      Hmm? We’re not genetically engineered for that, that’s what the pentagon helped design the space alien clones for.

      We’re planned to regress to infantile ignorance and remain enslaved as we slowly die-off by the force of our own entertainments.

    • abozak@telus.net' Ann says:

      Thomas – you say there are actually five. Would appreciate knowing what the other 3 are. I can be reached at: anbo352@hotmail.com
      Thanks. I know I am reading this quite a while after you wrote it but look forward to hearing from you.

  10. 1039481026061964@facebook.com' Alex Crofford says:

    Has ANYONE actually gone up there and taken a bloody sample DIRECTLY from it? If so, please provide link of documentation.

  11. 999612306727136@facebook.com' Sander Houtman says:

    Guido Trott

  12. 10153058601836105@facebook.com' Kristian Lewin says:

    Calvaire, it certainly isn’t an attention or an ego thing. I simply refuse to believe that everyone in the world is out to get us. I guess you could you say it’s an optimism thing.

  13. 524535631037491@facebook.com' Andrea Preece says:

    If you actually educated yourself into what is in the chemtrails you would understand the difference between aero vapour and chemtrails. Please educate yourself before you make comments, and explain this to the endless people dying from their fall out. This is why we have a big problem becoming over run and lead to the camps because of attitudes like this. Also why do you think so many failed airline companies get bailed out, its not because they want you to have a happy holiday, they have a bigger reason that you!

  14. 10153058601836105@facebook.com' Kristian Lewin says:

    Hahaha. “Dying from their fallout”? Proof Andrea, proof! People died from the fallout of Hiroshima and Chernobyl not from exhaust fumes in the sky on carefully designed aviation highways.

  15. 169854163360245@facebook.com' Guido Trott says:

    Anne Langner

  16. 10153788061364015@facebook.com' Brett Hopkinson says:

    Anti science lunatics.You are being controlled by your fears.

  17. 10207580889944109@facebook.com' Linda Rust says:

    Sounds like CN has unleashed that nutty writer again. Is it the site’s founder’s son/daughter/crazy wife? Hopefully it’s just one nutty writer.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Kelley O’Neil Roberts

  19. 1659763854308252@facebook.com' Bill Armstrong says:

    Bacon! It’s bacon I tell ya……..

  20. 699721590163668@facebook.com' Shannon Wills says:

    Mark Martin doomed.

  21. 10153058601836105@facebook.com' Kristian Lewin says:

    Or maybe they hang longer in the air due to things like a lack of wind or certain atmospheric conditions?

  22. 10153667205303745@facebook.com' Rick Es says:

    It’s really not working. My thought is the atmosphere is so destroyed that these are a protective barrier so we don’t Fry.

  23. 10156134204170366@facebook.com' Jade Gelinas says:

    I think its bull shit !

    • …and what is your basis for this assertion? I base my assertions on circumstantial evidence of the highest credibility. Look at the references. Why do you assert that I am wrong? Can you point to credible evidence which disproves my assertions? Or do you just like to spout off without any gravitas?

  24. 10207351144805288@facebook.com' Zach Mckinney says:

    Who are the pilots?

  25. 10153695119529712@facebook.com' Pete Pruitt says:

    Same people that staged the so-called moon landing!
    ROFLMFAO!

  26. 1236321939728295@facebook.com' Daniel Platten says:

    I don’t even buy this paper, it is more baloney fabricated to make the horrid sound good and to fool the people of the planet so they do not know the true risk of the heavy metals within those chem trails.

    • You’re reaching pretty far for that. What evidence do you have for this assertion? Why does simply recounting this Project’s history make me a disinformation agent in your view?

  27. 10206703668024112@facebook.com' Jg Christian Noel says:

    those pictures should be identified over what region , where ? for concrete reference .As is : no credibility ! sensassionnalisim..

  28. 799943850115581@facebook.com' Jay Jones says:

    Who have them the right to pollute out air??

  29. 1497270893900109@facebook.com' Being Jabari Jones says:

    Blocking Uv Rays To Starve Your Penile Gland. ….those mornings rays are important.

  30. 1497270893900109@facebook.com' Being Jabari Jones says:

    I see dumb sheep.

  31. 10205228245001367@facebook.com' Anthony Spears says:

    There is zero evidence to support these claims.

  32. tyagikapil1980@gmail.com' kapil tyagi says:

    I like spirituality

  33. abozak@telus.net' Ann says:

    I find that all the snowflakes and younger generation are the result of the dumbing down of Americans. I was born in 1950 and others of my age can attest to these chemtrails. We’ve seen the atmosphere changes since our youth. Plus we aim to be “educated” . The younger generation want proof. Well here is the proof in black and white in this article and they still don’t believe. Stupid is as stupid does. Plus it is the snowflakes and other youngsters that will help further the destruction of North America due to their ignorance of everything. Hey snowflakes – your pineal gland and ability to learn and reason has been totally compromised by these chemtrails, chemicals, GMO’s, vaccines (although older vaccines were safer), and a lot of other things you know nothing about. Us older and wiser persons wish the younger generation would grab a brain. Most of you turned out to be an insult to the education field, a let down to your parents, a let down to the furtherance of mankind and science, BUT a plus to the establishment government elites. If only the snowflake generation(s) were older and wiser you wouldn’t make such dumb comments.

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend