What Caused the First Human Death in Self-Driving Car: Sensors “Aren’t Sophisticated Enough…”

Written by on July 6, 2017 in Sci-Tech, Technology with 13 Comments

Self driving car death-compressed

By Mac Slavo | Activist Post

The first death has been reported in self-driving cars. Our worst fears about artificial intelligence are already beginning to come true.

A test man working with Tesla motors was killed after the autopilot feature failed to see a bright-white 18-wheeler which was poorly contrast against the bright lit sky.

It is unfortunate, and spooky, since white is the most common color for tractor trailers, and the big rigs account for the most deadly accidents. One wonders how a tiny, smart car making decisions of a computer would stand up to such a vehicle.

Not “sophisticated enough to overcome blindness from bright or low contrast light.” Videographers know how easily blown-out light that is too bright can ruin an otherwise well-composed shot. Cameras can do a lot, but digital sensors aren’t usually good at compensating for this issue.

And it happens to be reason this man got killed, as Yahoo! reports:

The U.S. announced Thursday the first fatality in a wreck involving a car in self-driving mode, the 40-year-old owner of a technology company who nicknamed his vehicle “Tessy” and had praised its sophisticated “Autopilot” system just one month earlier for preventing a collision on an interstate. The government said it is investigating the design and performance of the system aboard the Tesla Model S sedan.

Joshua D. Brown, of Canton, Ohio, died in the accident May 7 in Williston, Florida, when his car’s cameras failed to distinguish the white side of a turning tractor-trailer from a brightly lit sky and didn’t automatically activate its brakes, according to government records obtained Thursday.


The technology relies on multiple cameras, radar, laser and computers to sense objects and determine if they are in the car’s way, said Mike Harley, an analyst at Kelley Blue Book. Systems like Tesla’s, which rely heavily on cameras, “aren’t sophisticated enough to overcome blindness from bright or low contrast light,” he said.

This time, it wasn’t human error.

Let that sink in.

On the other hand, according to the report from the truck driver who collided with the vehicle, the man was not only asleep at the wheel, but watching a DVD of Harry Potter at the time of the crash:

Frank Baressi, 62, the driver of the truck and owner of Okemah Express LLC, said the Tesla driver was “playing Harry Potter on the TV screen” at the time of the crash and driving so quickly that “he went so fast through my trailer I didn’t see him.”

“It was still playing when he died and snapped a telephone pole a quarter mile down the road,” Baressi told The Associated Press

Wow. And you think others will be paying attention when they get behind the wheel of these things?

Neither parts of this techno-tragedy bode well for the future.

People are quick to turn themselves over to conveniences and gadgets, and many will happily put their lives in the hands of these vehicles.

But technology, no matter how sophisticated, can’t directly interpret reality.

And cold hard reality is just what this car crashed into, and the sensors didn’t catch it.

A few months ago, a Google self-driving car had the industry’s first car accident.

Google Self-Driving Car Causes Accident For The First Time

Read more:

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

You can read more from Mac Slavo at his site SHTFplan.com.

Read more great articles at Activist Post.

Tags: , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

13 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Ridiculous that we are going this way before perfected. And who in the world is going to find out how to fix these cars a mechanic or IT?

  2. Delia Colon Delia Colon says:

    Not like car accidents don’t happen and the statistics for vehicle related deaths are high. A few bugs although if the key was safety and progression of vehicle technology we’d already have those flying cars.

  3. Licia Foye Licia Foye says:

    I like to drive.

  4. The technology just not there yet.

  5. Kathy Popp Kathy Popp says:

    safer than riding with my Mother, or a drunk, or a texter.

  6. rudistade@live.ca' Rudi Stade says:

    Of course it was human error, on the part of those who designed the sensors. The car didn’t design the sensors.

  7. Wendy Hardin Wendy Hardin says:

    So I guess the world has to stop blaming the truck driver. No one needs to be watching Harry Potter in a driver’s seat. This technology obviously is not ready for stupid people in cars.

  8. Taylor Taxin Taylor Taxin says:

    Melanie Wilner Taxin don’t get it

  9. Could have been avoided if the driver were being attentive.

  10. Erik Albert Erik Albert says:

    All because of your simplicity. You are converting a ´normal´ car (whatever that is) into a ´self-driving normal car´. If you were to design an utterly automated vehicle from scratch, you would have to design its concept first, and establish what it is exactly that you want it to do for you. Putting a steering wheel in what is suppposed to be an utterly automated vehicle borders absolute insanity. It literally means you didn´t even start to think about the concept just yet.

  11. Gravity, like Darwinism, can only be temporarily suspended by technology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend