Can Digital Photography Actually PROVE That We Are Energy Beings?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We are energy beings and as Cynthia Sue Larson explains, photography can actually “expose” these other dimensions of self.

Many have long known that we are energy beings. You’ve heard it before, “We are not a human being having a spiritual experience – we are a spiritual being having a human experience.” And as cliche as this may sound, now with our ever advancing technology, including and especially digital cameras, we are seeing direct evidence that this (that we are energy beings) is true.

In my recent filmed interview with ET contact researcher and lecturer Mary Rodwell, we discussed an image of Mary that was taken during one of her recent talks. She had just completed an energy healing on an individual who was present in the room, and then began her talk, which among other things included her findings with regard to some of the new or “star” children that she has researched in great depth.

At the conclusion of the talk, an audience member came rushing up to her to show her what appeared to be a spirit or etheric double of Mary – somewhat phantom-like in structure – with her eyes aiming toward the ceiling and mouth closed and with a look of complete reverence.


“Ghostly” image of Mary Rodwell at a recent talk.

After our episode aired, we received quite a few comments from viewers who felt this to be a simple case of “double exposure.” Mary and I in fact consulted with a photographer who although agreed that this was probably a double exposure, also admitted that there could be something else going on simultaneously.

When I showed the image to quantum researcher and avid photographer Cynthia Sue Larson, she quickly and adamantly stated that though digital photography has definitely revealed many anomalies (including orb like images) double exposure is not one of them.

“I love seeing a double image photo, because I don’t see them anymore…I grew up with the old style film cameras and back in those days if you didn’t advance the film, you’d get a double exposure…because really since we’ve had digital cameras…this is the first double image photo that I’ve literally seen in all the last decade or so of digital photography. So my first reaction [when I saw this image] was ‘WOW, I just don’t see these anymore’,” Cynthia said.

When I told her that this photo was taken with a smart phone camera she said she got goosebumps. “That’s when I thought ‘Oh my gosh. Because something definitely is going on and if people are saying this is a double exposure with a cell phone, well please explain to me how that happened..I know photographers that would love to generate these kind of images and they’re not able to.”

So what is going on?

Find out what Cynthia had to say about our energy bodies and how digital photography may be revealing a lot more than a simple double exposure!

Download the audio version and get important links from this episode HERE

iTunes3

If you haven’t already, be sure to subscribe to our show on iTunes!

 

alexisheadshotv2Alexis Brooks is the #1 best-selling author of Conscious Musings, writer/editor for CLN and host of the award-winning show Higher Journeys with Alexis Brooks. Alexis brings over 30 years of broadcast media experience to CLN. For over half of that time, Alexis has dedicated her work to the medium of alternative journalism, having researched and reported on the many aspects and angles of metaphysics, spirituality and new thought concepts.

This article and its accompanying media was originally created and produced by Higher Journeys in association Conscious Life News and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alexis Brooks, HigherJourneys.com and ConsciousLifeNews.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this Copyright/Creative Commons statement.

 

Tags: , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

3 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. starline@iinet.net.au' Mary Rodwell says:

    Thank you Alexis Loved the interview and thank you so much for exploring this for me

  2. contactus@aapi.info' Melissa Kennedy says:

    Hi Alexis, we’re an evidence based research organisation presenting video and photographic documentation of unidentified aerial phenomena in Australia. We created an earlier post about the image in question and presented an example of our own double exposure which I’ll attach below. I’m happy to hear that both yourself and Mary consulted a professional photographer who advised you that the photo is an untouched double exposure, such as our own example. At the same time I hope that you might understand our perplexity when you mention that the goal of your chat with Cynthia above, is not to come up with a conclusive answer, but to explore the possibilities.. you mention that just because it’s one thing (a double exposure) that it doesn’t eliminate the possibility that it could be something else. We’ve shared our picture below on Mary’s pages, but many people who are attracted to all things as yet unexplained, tend to be encouraged to nurture particular beliefs, which are powerful psychological drives based on preferences, or hopeful, wishful thinking rather than the facts which most definitely do exist particularly in cases like this, but are not the focus of certain speakers. We’re often accused of debunking. The irony is that as direct experiencers of unidentified aerial phenomena (for which we offer evidence of our experience for others to examine) surprisingly its effects in our case are deeply grounding and as a result we’ve immersed ourselves in the subject matter to the degree that we understand to a limit, various aspects including photography and how certain images can be perceived as paranormal, when they’re not at all. We are still learning. For those that are interested, we have an album on our website dedicated to misidentifications, under “Photos”. We offer original footage or photographs and corresponding technical details to any serious researcher. Perhaps that’s something you may wish to consider doing with Mary’s photo, for those who would like to examine the EXIF data and other details. It’s important to say that we’re not in competition with anyone. We are telling the truth of what we’ve experienced and of what we have learned because of it. Thanks for reading and for the opportunity to share. (double exposure) https://imgur.com/po3XLBx (website) https://www.aapi.info

  3. yowies@gmail.com' Mike Williams says:

    It is clearly a double exposure.The “quantum researcher” doesnt know a thing about photography.The hand in the foreground of the same photo, which you did not mention for a good reason is also a double exposure.The photographer has moved their hand a fraction. Film and digital can pick up “energies” we cannot “see”.But to segue from that..leads you nowhere in regards to photography.To suggest that this is a paranormal photo after it was repeatedly explained to Mary Rodwell that it obviously is not..makes the whole field look ridiculous.The argument that it “might” be paranormal or that people have different opinions on it, is also specious to an extreme.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend