California Politicians Could Soon be Forced to Wear Logos of Top Corporate Donors

Written by on December 30, 2015 in Government, Politics with 34 Comments


By Carey Wedler | The Anti Media

(ANTIMEDIA) Popular memes calling for politicians to wear the logos of their corporate sponsors have circulated the internet for years, but the suggestion may soon be a reality for California legislators. In the next week, a potential ballot measure, submitted to the Office of the Attorney General in October, is expected to receive title and summary for the 2016 election, meaning its advocates will be able to collect signatures in order to secure its official place on the ballot. The proposed law would require legislators and candidates to sport the emblems of groups that donate money to their campaigns.

Related Article: Happy Holidays, Super PACs: FEC Removes Yet Another Block Against Dark Money

As the advocacy group that launched the measure, California is Not for Sale, muses:

“Imagine this: a California Senator is speaking on the floor and proposes a bill he just drafted that will give oil companies huge tax advantages. Now imagine if on his jacket, he was wearing Chevron, Shell, and BP logos – some of his top ten contributors. Our law will bring this under-the-table-corruption to the surface and expose these politicians who take political contributions in exchange for favors for what they really are: corrupt.”

The ballot’s sponsor, John Cox, is an entrepreneur from San Diego and long-time advocate of reforming the California legislature, which is rife with scandal and corruption. The legislature has been plagued withmultiple ethics violations and hearings, and last year, members of the governing body flew to Maui to meet with corporate executives and union bosses, who funded the trip by funneling funds through a non-profit organization. The Los Angeles Times reported on the doublespeak-inspired “Independent Voter Project,” which sponsored the event:

The group gets its money from about 24 entities, many putting up at least $7,500. They include Occidental Petroleum Corp., the Western State Petroleum Assn., Eli Lilly, the Altria tobacco firm, the California Cable and Telecommunications Assn., the state prison guards union and the California Distributors Assn., which represents distributors of tobacco and other products.”

This ongoing political climate in Sacramento, California’s capital, has inspired Cox’s activism for years. Before launching the logo initiative, Coxpromoted the idea of electing more legislators to provide more direct representation to California’s large voting population. Whereas New Hampshire has one representative for every 4,000 voters, California has one for about every 483,000. Considering most voters are opposed to adding more legislators, however, Cox developed California is Not for Sale.

Related Article: Purchasing Political Power: How the “Wealth Primary” is Undermining Voter’s Rights

At the end of August, the group organized a protest outside the state capitol building, setting up life-size cutouts of over 121 state legislators, including Governor Jerry Brown. They were all decorated with their corporate donors’ logos, from 7-11 to AT&T and Walmart. The demonstration was well-received, drawing significant attention from passersby and the lawmakers themselves.

At the end of October, Cox officially submitted a request to add the measure to the 2016 ballot. In addition to requiring lawmakers to wear the logos of their top ten contributors every time they appear in the legislature, the proposed measure would also require political candidates to disclose their top ten donors in political advertisements.

After filing the petition, Cox said, “It’s a corrupt system and it’s got to change,” adding that “[i]f they don’t take any money, they won’t have to wear any stickers.” He explained the goal was not to embarrass lawmakers or attack corporations, unions, and collective bargaining, but rather, to raise awareness about big money’s influence in politics. “I think many of them, most of them, are probably good people. But they’re caught in a corrupt system,” he said.

The group announced late Sunday it is “preparing to receive title and summary in the next week and will then begin collecting signatures across California.” They must receive 365,000 signatures to secure a spot on the 2016 ballot, and are confident they will meet the requirement. As Ryan Smith, a coordinator for California is Not for Sale, told Anti-Media, “We’ve received a tremendous amount of support from the community so far. People love this idea. Their entire lives they have felt helpless and abused by politicians; our measure puts the power back in their hands.”

Unsurprisingly, the initiative has drawn mixed reviews from lawmakers. Smith said the organization has received angry emails from some legislators demanding the group stop using life-size cutouts of their image. Senator Marty Block told San Diego’s local ABC affiliate that he “supports reasonable measures to provide more transparency to our legislative process,” but did not explicitly endorse the measure.

Though assembly member Rocky Chavez acknowledged the legislature needs more transparency, he argued that “[t]o have everyone decked out like race car drivers would be a circus element which wouldn’t really benefit the public.” Instead, he suggested requiring candidates and legislators to list their top ten donors on their websites, though this would likely mean far less exposure than displaying them on the floor of the legislature.

Asked about Chavez’s claim the proposed law would create a “circus element,” Smith responded, “You know what’s a circus? That politicians can openly take money from corporations and unions and have no accountability afterwards. It’s a complete joke. If Mr. Chavez doesn’t like this, I have a brilliant solution for him: stop taking money. Problem solved, circus avoided!

Either way, one thing is clear: as Cox said, “These people are not going to change it on their own.” As California is Not for Sale’s website asserts, “Big money in politics has gone too far. Average citizens don’t have a voice and it’s time that changes. By highlighting big money in politics, we can raise awareness around this issue and give citizens the voice they deserve.” Smith says the proposed ballot measure is only the first of several steps the group will launch over the coming years, “all with the goal of ending political corruption in our country.”

Related Article: Brazil’s Top Court Bans Corporate Money in Election Campaigns

To get involved with the measure, visit or

This article (California Politicians Could Soon be Forced to Wear Logos of Top Corporate Donors) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Carey Wedler and Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo,

Read more great articles at The Anti Media.

Tags: , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

34 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Jeffrey Adams says:

    Like nascar!!! Hahaha

  2.' Imma Lima says:

    Yeahh!!!! They all should wear overalls with stickers!!!

  3.' Maureen O'Donnell says:

    Do it!!

  4.' Mylez Edward says:

    I am in favor…. “aye’!!

  5.' Dlav Gaucher says:

    OR…like CLOWN SUITS…which would better defined THEM….. LMAO

  6.' Jeremiah Jennings says:

    this will never work, it’s about making a statement more than anything. those it would effect are allowed to vote on it, it’ll fail at a well-planned narrow margin.

  7.' Nic Smith says:

    This is a lie

  8.' Nic Smith says:

    Why does this page post sooooo much bullshit

  9.' Em Granosky says:

    Love it! California doing something right!

  10.' Cory Berg says:

    Promises Promises

  11.' Adam Wells says:

    Id love this but no way will government show off their corporate ties… lowers approval ratings.

  12.' Vincent Palmer says:

    It’s a step in the right direction.

  13.' Robyn Van Lieu says:

    Sounds like a winner to me 🙂

  14.' Marnie Brogle Case says:

    About time! It’s not the answer, but it’s in the right direction. 🙂

    •' Kimberly Crawford says:

      I would love to see all politicians have to advertise where they got their funds and see what asses they are kissing.

  15.' Patricia Cameron says:

    Ah HA!

  16.' Don Lilly says:

    fuck this state of yuppie facism,,, cant wait to leave,,, and never return hope it shakes to hell,,,,OH BUT WAIT IT ALREADY IS YUPPIE HELL<<<LOLOLOLOLOL

  17.' Lynn Crutchfield says:

    This ought to be fun!!!!!

  18.' Consuelo Asebedo says:

    They should wear suits like race car drivers and have their vehicles with decals as to who is paying them off… Excuse me…. supporting them.

  19.' Friday Anton says:

    Who cares? There just stupid because the legislators are puppets, normal citizens in tax returns can’t get more than them and their subsidies.

  20.' Jessica Wilhelm says:

    That is awesome

  21.' Marsha Graham says:

    Oh yeah, like that’s going to happen….not likely.

  22.' Jacqueline Scherer Bradley says:

    Yes please!

  23.' Justina Fehlman says:

    Omg, “welcome to Costco, I love you” sponsored by taco bell, why don’t we all just start watering our plants with brawndo..

  24.' Sharon Rose Dean says:

    good, we will know who own’s them…. they work for them not the people!!!

  25.' Diem Marseille says:

    Californians don’t mess around that’s why I love that state and can’t wait to move there this spring

  26.' Collin Fen says:

    Yep then everyone will know what politition was bought off by whom

  27.' John O'Brien Jr. says:

    It will never happen.

  28.' Elizabeth Andre says:

    Hilarious! I hope they do this!#! REALLY! !!!

  29.' Katrina Hogue says:

    This proves voting is not even real; in America you vote with your dollar.

  30.' Greg Johnson says:

    How about making “donations” illegal, now would that not be a good idea!!!!

  31.' Jay Jones says:

    Great idea.

  32.' Jay Jones says:

    How will we know ALL the donors are listed??or money isn’t comingled?

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Send this to a friend