Brazil’s Top Court Bans Corporate Money in Election Campaigns

image_pdfimage_print

By Anthony Boadle | The Daily Mail UK

Brazil&MagnifyingGlass-10144092_m-680c380

Brazil's Supreme Court decided on Thursday to ban corporate donations to election campaign financing in a move to clean up Brazilian politics caught in a massive kickback scandal.

The top court voted 8-3 to allow election donations from individuals but not from companies, a decision that renders unconstitutional a bill passed last week by the country's Congress allowing corporate funding for political parties.


The ruling comes in the midst of Brazil's biggest corruption investigation into bribes and political kickbacks on contracts with state-oil company Petrobras. The funds allegedly went into the pockets of dozens of politicians in President Dilma Rousseff's governing coalition.

The treasurer of her Worker's Party is in jail, and her election-campaign accounts are under investigation to see whether bribe money was used to help re-elect her last October.

The scandal heightened public scrutiny of corporate funding as scores of executives from Brazil's largest construction firms were indicted on corruption charges for paying bribes from overpriced contracts with Petroleo Brasileiro.


“We have come to an absolutely chaotic situation in which economic power dominates political power in an illegal way,” Justice Luiz Fux said, arguing with the majority that the ban on corporate funding is needed to set an equal playing field for election candidates.

The Supreme Court's decision had been on hold for 16 months after one of its members, Gilmar Mendes, asked for more time to consider the issue, arguing that Congress should rule on the matter first.

Last week, lawmakers reversed their earlier position and passed a bill that would allow companies to fund parties in election campaigns but not make donations to individual candidates. The bill is awaiting Rousseff's signature to become law.

[Read more here]

Robert O'Leary 150x150Robert O’Leary, JD BARA, has had an abiding interest in alternative health products & modalities since the early 1970’s & he has seen how they have made people go from lacking health to vibrant health. He became an attorney, singer-songwriter, martial artist & father along the way and brings that experience to his practice as a BioAcoustic Soundhealth Practitioner, under the tutelage of the award-winning founder of BioAcoustic Biology, Sharry Edwards, whose Institute of BioAcoustic Biology has now been serving clients for 30 years with a non-invasive & safe integrative modality that supports the body’s ability to self-heal using the power of the human voice. Robert brings this modality to serve clients in Greater Springfield (MA), New England & “virtually” the world, with his website, www.romayasoundhealthandbeauty.com. He can also be reached at romayasoundhealth andbeauty@gmail.com.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

18 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 10153508324875041@facebook.com' Rodolfo Teles says:

    Alannah Crandall

  2. 10207430289138332@facebook.com' Adam Sandnes says:

    To bad our court is on the take from corporate oligarchy.

  3. 1051998618158186@facebook.com' Ian Campbell says:

    Should be the same here!

  4. 10207657577106155@facebook.com' James J Walsh says:

    Well done Brazil. Should be Worldwide.

  5. 438288283024390@facebook.com' WendyJoy Smith says:

    well done Brazil, leading the way

  6. 10153117834328297@facebook.com' Terrie LaSpesa says:

    The only candidate not taking corporate money….Donald J. Trump!

    • 10203724898237713@facebook.com' Pat Bennett says:

      Trump is corporate money he doesn’t need outside money to fund him he’s rich enough but he had to bankrupt himself several times to do it is that who you’d want running your country someone with the potential to bankrupt your county worse that it is? That kinda a question I guess. (Neighbour to the north)

  7. 10153692060780087@facebook.com' Nancy Michaels says:

    No reason why the United States can’t do the same

  8. 10206296267219839@facebook.com' Venisse Schossler says:

    Well, this ia just a little step here. My country is devasted for corruption and bad administration. We dont have acess to education, health and security. If they receive this money and do something to poor Brazilian people, liKE in USA or Europe, will not be so injustice. But, we are living in the caos.

  9. 1644586239113678@facebook.com' Leo Cooper says:

    Great (y)

  10. 10153041138400952@facebook.com' Kay Mackenzie says:

    As long as they also outlaw donations from unions, crime organizations, foreign governments and religious groups. The tax-payer will then have to support their campaigns, though.

  11. 1017316824965252@facebook.com' Dennis Wandell says:

    lead brazil

  12. 10203724898237713@facebook.com' Pat Bennett says:

    Send that ruling up here!!

  13. 10153497503934494@facebook.com' Brandon Broach says:

    This country the U.S. should do the same…

  14. 10153651507096584@facebook.com' Karl Wolf says:

    Gee, really corporate corruption in election financing? Ask Scalia. He’ll say it’s a good thing.

  15. 10207166892307993@facebook.com' Grant Fairchild says:

    Gee, ya think that would work in N. America for “Democracy” to work? Hmmm…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend