U.S. Bombs Doctors Without Borders Hospital in Afghanistan Shortly After They Criticized the TPP Agreement. Coincidence?

Posted by on October 6, 2015 in Government, Military with 14 Comments

Afghanistan hospital bombed by U.S. Forces

By Claire Bernish | ActivistPost.com

Had the President of Nobel Peace Prize-winning Doctors Without Borders not warned us of the “imminent threat to global health” posed by the TPP, would these 22 doctors and patients have lost their lives early Saturday?

“I don’t know exactly how long, but it was maybe half an hour afterwards that they stopped bombing. I went out with the project coordinator to see what had happened. What we saw was the hospital destroyed, burning,” described nurse Lajos Zoltan Jecs of the U.S. bombardment of a hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan.

Harsh criticism and skepticism surround what is being labeled an errant U.S. bombardment of a hospital in Kunduz that left 22 people dead — many of them volunteers with Médecins sans Frontières (Doctors without Borders, the humanitarian aid agency) — but doubt lingers about the vague official story for a reason.

Doctors Without Borders Calls Airstrike a War Crime

“Why did they have to blow up the whole hospital?” pleaded Nasratullah, whose 25-year-old cousin Akbar was among doctors killed in the bombing. “We know that the Americans are very clever. If they can target a single person in a car from their planes, why did they have to blow up the whole building?”

The ostensible explanation according to rumor centered on reports Taliban forces had entered the location and were using the cover of the hospital to fire on coalition forces.


Christopher Stokes, MSF General Director, irately stated, “Not a single member of our staff reported fighting inside the MSF hospital compound prior to the U.S. airstrike Saturday morning. The hospital was full of MSF staff, patients, and their caretakers. It is 12 MSF staff members and ten patients, including three children, who were killed in the attack.”

Is something being overlooked?

“U.S. forces conducted an airstrike in Kunduz City at 2:15 am [local time] on 3 October against individuals threatening the force. The strike may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility. This incident is under investigation,” stated international coalition spokesperson, Col. Brian Tribus.

“This attack is abhorrent and a grave violation of international humanitarian law,” declared MSF President, Meinie Nicolai. “We demand total transparency from coalition forces. We cannot accept that this horrific loss of life will simply be dismissed as ‘collateral damage.’”

Reports from the scene indicate MSF had not only notified all warring parties in the region of the exact GPS coordinates for the hospital and its outlying buildings, but that doctors immediately notified forces the moment the hospital came under fire from a U.S. airstrike — and, even then, the attack continued for a full 30 minutes.

Stokes found that suggestion wholly inadequate, adding:

Under clear presumption that a war crime has been committed, MSF demands that a full and transparent investigation into the event be conducted by an independent international body. Relying only on an internal investigation by a party to the conflict would be wholly insufficient.

So why did the attack continue, much less happen in the first place?

Doctors Without Borders Vocally Opposes the TPP

If circumstances of any incident appear not to add up, it’s pertinent to thoroughly examine the current narrative for signs the State is attempting to mold public opinion — because it is there you will find the truth that you’re not being told.

In the case of MSF, a massive treaty cum trade deal involving U.S. interests in another part of the world from the tragedy in Kunduz can offer, perhaps, insight which might otherwise seem unrelated. As it turns out, MSF have been particularly vocal critics of the impending Trans-Pacific Partnership — and their criticism hasn’t gone unnoticed.

As reported in the National Journal in May:

“It’s not usual business for us, and the reason is because we’re very worried,” explained Judit Rius Sanjuan, who oversees Doctors Without Borders drug access campaign, in a phone interview. “We are doing anything we can to make sure the public is aware.”

Though the Nobel Prize-winning group has actively but reservedly opposed the massive TPP deal for years, recent letters to President Obama and a campaign of subway ads on the D.C. Metro show a more urgent, public push. Sanjuan admitted such a robust effort “is not usual practice for us.”

What is so pressing for the public to know that it led the group to abandon its typically subdued tone?

Simply, drug costs. Specifically, the intellectual property and patent laws that will favor drug companies should the TPP take effect.

Related Article: Fast Track and TPP Derailed? House Deals Blow to Corporate-Friendly Trade Agenda

Coincidentally, TPP Negotiations Are Wrapping Up Today

Negotiations reached a head over the weekend for the 12-country Trans-Pacific Partnership, as Australia and the U.S. attempted to hammer out differences over intellectual property rules for next-generation biologic medicines.

Though the U.S. seeks to keep a 12-year period in place for pharmaceutical companies to retain exclusive rights over clinical data, Australian Trade Minister Andrew Robb reportedly won’t budge past a five year limit. At issue is data exclusivity — the longer the information is held, the longer it takes for generics to reach the market.

“Australia’s current arrangements are completely adequate and any proposed changes are non-negotiable, this is a red line issue for us,” asserted Robb.

After five days of marathon talks for the TPP in Atlanta, negotiations were pushed back again — but a vote could come as soon as Monday night.

doctors-without-borders-tppProtecting Profit vs. Saving Lives

“It would force them to change the law of many of these countries that are currently negotiating to create new intellectual property protections for pharmaceutical drugs, including but not limited to patents,” Sanjuan explained about the deal as exposed by WikiLeaks in 2013. “The effects of these new obligations would limit generic competition and therefore increase the cost of medicine.”

This has put Médecins sans Frontières “at odds with the White House,” as the National Journal delicately described. A recent letter to Obama from MSF clearly alluded to the humanitarian nature of the group’s opposition to the trade deal:

MSF believes this is essential to closing the gap in access to medicines to millions of people around the world. The TPP could be an opportunity to make significant progress toward these goals. Instead, in its current state, the TPP is a threat to the health of millions.

As evidenced in the Kunduz hospital bombing and numerous military campaigns in the Middle East and elsewhere, the human toll likely isn’t the priority first called to mind by the U.S. government.

Profit, on the other hand, must be protected no matter the human cost.

Related Article: Fast Track and TPP Are Trash-Let’s Throw Them Out

After this attack, MSF decided to pull its operations from Kunduz for the foreseeable future. As Jecs lamented,

The hospital, it has been my workplace and home for several months. Yes, it is just a building. But it is so much more than that. It is healthcare for Kunduz. Now it is gone. What is the benefit of this? Destroying a hospital and so many lives, for nothing. I cannot find words for this.

Was Doctors Without Borders accidentally bombed by US — or is there something we’re not being told? Click To Tweet

With the number of questions being raised, we will continue to look into the incident further.

Image Credit

This article (Did Obama Bomb Doctors Without Borders for Opposing TPP?) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

READ MORE ARTICLES FROM ACTIVISTPOST.COM…

Tags: , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

14 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 938544676218860@facebook.com' Virginia Budiongan Basbas says:

    That is what we call ISIS run in the wrong Christian. …

  2. 999612660060263@facebook.com' Paulo Afonso Coutinho says:

    I think we finance this.

  3. 139489899739266@facebook.com' Tristan Black says:

    been thinking that,that they wanted some doctor dead

  4. 1481035618876924@facebook.com' Christie Gil says:

    WE KILLED THE MAIN GUY?!??! THE GODDAMN MAIN MOTHER FUCKING GUY OF DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS?!?!?!??!?!?!

    I…. I’m going rogue…… these peoole, these evil people…. they gotta be stopped. Somebody has do do something!!!!!! DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS?!?!?!?!??! D: D: 🙁 🙁 ????????????????

  5. 1183387731676947@facebook.com' Joe Bizumo says:

    But no foreign doctors killed ,so they were tipped off!

  6. 10203729198468927@facebook.com' Jan DeSipio says:

    I think this is sick. Not for one second do I think it was intentional. Where do these fears come from? Conspiracies – the far left has joined the far right.

  7. 10206509652032553@facebook.com' Liana Staikos says:

    Y & how the fk do they get away with this shit is beyond me! Y the fk do we let them? Oh thats right the “the Law book of brain washed control, chapter elite corruption authority dah!, section fuck u we do wat we want, page wat a coincidence ha yeah show me the exact proof & evidence then” -“Um open ur fk eyes”
    -“nope sorry but the book of law decides to rule against ur mentally unstable vision & 4 this we sentence u to life in prison good bye”!!! FKN JOKE

  8. 837503593029545@facebook.com' Shure Isbest says:

    no surprises there

  9. 10153886291773455@facebook.com' Bryan W. Wilson says:

    one that is there you take the risk , shit can happen

  10. 10203729198468927@facebook.com' Jan DeSipio says:

    So everyone just assumes this is true. Wow! I bet I could spin any event and make it sound anyway I wanted it to. This was a horrible mistake, they happen in war. Why not just grieve for those who died and work hard to change congress in 2016. Yea, I know a lot will say “that won’t change anything”. Do you have a better idea?

  11. 1032165223490659@facebook.com' Andrea Foster says:

    hmmmmm…

  12. 10207988891385862@facebook.com' Michael Pecot says:

    Not likely.

  13. 10206461022237203@facebook.com' Graham Reidy says:

    Good point

  14. 815325521919009@facebook.com' Mary-Lu Lorenson says:

    Nothing too outrageous surprises me any longer which means we all know that assassinations are now common place are being used as a means to retaliate those who get in the way of profit..

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend