The Biggest Danger to Net Neutrality is Now Political, Not Legal

Posted by on November 10, 2014 in Government, Internet Control with 0 Comments

 | Gigaom

keep internet freeThe White House stunned the tech and telecom world on Monday morning with a call for the FCC to take a full-blown, no-gimmick approach to net neutrality. In clear words, President Obama told the agency to use its Title II power to reclassify broadband providers as public utilities, and thereby snuff the industry’s plans for “fast lanes” and other schemes to favor some websites over others when delivering internet to consumers.

This appears to be great news for consumer advocates and the likes of Netflix, which has been at the mercy of repeated ISP shakedowns, but it’s still far too soon for them to pop the champagne. Even though President Obama, who delivered the news in a tweet (signed “-bo”), has given FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler an unexpected mandate to implement Title II, the powerful telecom industry will do all it can to put a stop to this.


On Monday morning, for instance, Verizon published a short statement reminding the FCC that a Title II approach “will face strong legal challenges.” The statement is a not-subtle message that Verizon will promptly drag the agency into another high-stakes lawsuit, like the one the company used to put the FCC in this net neutrality predicament in the first place.

But despite Verizon’s bluster, Wheeler is on very solid ground when it comes tousing Title II. Who says? Why, the very court that blew up the FCC’s last set of net neutrality rules.

For those unfamiliar, this whole affair — which touched off John Oliver’s epic screedon “cable company fuckery” and more than 4 million public comments — began in January, when the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia agreed with Verizonthat the FCC could not use “information service” regulations to impose net neutrality on internet providers.

The D.C. ruling made clear that the FCC’s earlier “Open Internet” order was toast, but the court also threw the FCC an important lifeline by saying that the agencycould impose such rules if it reclassified the internet providers under Title II. And that’s what President Obama has just suggested the FCC should do.

This means that while Verizon can sue the FCC and probably will (suing is something the company likes to do), it will almost certainly lose. Unlike the themongrel “hybrid” proposal the FCC floated two weeks ago, an unambiguous Title II reclassification would be consistent with the letter of the appeals court’s ruling, and survive any legal challenges.

But even though the FCC is on fine legal footing, it turns out that Wheeler has far more to fear from Congress than he does from the courts.

Making the Chairman’s life “hell”

Even after a public swell of support for net neutrality this summer, few in Washington actually believed the FCC would go through with it. After all, in the absence of support from major tech players like Google and the clear backing of the White House, Wheeler had little reason to rile powerful players like Comcast and Verizon.


One industry source told me in September that he was confident that Wheeler would not go forward with Title II reclassification, in part because Republicans, on behalf of their telecom allies, would make the Chairman’s life “hell” if he did. More specifically, that “hell” in question would involve an endless series of subpoenas and committee circuses to tie up the agency and, more ominously, threats to use riders in must-pass bills to attack the independent agency’s budget.

The realpolitik thinking at the time, then, was that Wheeler would try to appease the net neutrality crowd with lip service to “open internet” principles, while also passing feckless “light touch” rules that would allow the Chairman to preserve his political capital for other priorities such as an ambitious-but-troubled spectrum auction.

Those calculations are all out the window now. President Obama has just changed the game by offering Wheeler broad political cover to go forward with net neutrality. The question now is if Wheeler will dare to use it.

Even though his Title II hand is much stronger than a week ago, he faces powerful new opposition in the form of a Republican-controlled Senate. And within hours of the President’s tweet, the GOP’s most prominent demagogue shot back with one of his own:

It’s a safe bet that this is just the opening shot in a coming cascade of political sludge that will characterize net neutrality as the spawn of socialism, liberal charity and more. And while the telecom giants have been relatively subtle in their messaging, that will change as Title II becomes a real possibility for the first time.

[read full post here]

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend