Big Victory! UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up!

Written by on September 15, 2014 in Corporate Controlled Media, Media & Arts with 9 Comments


Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World

Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Tags: , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

9 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' Rob says:

    This is good news! People are starting to be able to face the facts about 9/11

  2.' Trish says:

    Wow, not hard to believe at all.

  3.' Katherine L. says:

    And the house of cards that they have built continues to crumble. The laws of the universe are ever at work! fear not.

    Masks off Kuchina indeed!

  4.' D says:

    Which court did this hearing take place?

  5.' PUP says:

    What part of being found guilty and being ordered to pay costs is a victory?

  6.' PUP says:

    Horsham Magistrate’s court – he was found guilty.

  7.' terry says:

    about time we only pay a tv licence to the bbc all the others are free & there own terms & conditions are broken by them daily so why pay them for the rubbish they put out I never watch terrestrial tv so why do I have to pay the bbc as well as my satellite bill ?? this need a rethink as its not a law to pay the tv licence just them insisting on getting money from us

  8.' Beth says:

    Why do these people lie?? It discredits them
    Completely and gives potentially good arguments a bad name and makes the fight even harder. Gah.

  9.' BRADYboy says:

    He was found not guilty and not ordered to repay any fine for failure to pay his licence fee so what are you reading?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to a friend