Big Dairy Continues War Against Farmers & Raw Milk

Alexa Erickson | Collective-Evolution

Dairy is undoubtedly controversial. Regardless of whether it’s raw or pasteurized, many health experts would argue that it’s for babies, not adults.


Nature didn’t intend for milk to nourish adults. In fact, babies are weaned from their mothers’ breasts around the time their new teeth allow for proper consumption of solid food. Lactose intolerance is another valuable argument, with mammals generally losing the ability to digest lactose around the age of two. This explains the stigma surrounding milk for many — it makes them gag!

If it doesn’t make you queasy, and you do not have an intolerance to it, you may very well enjoy a glass occasionally (or regularly). That’s where the argument of the raw milk versus pasteurized milk comes into play.

Increasing numbers of Americans have gone back to the basics, preferring whole, organic foods. The movement also encompasses unpasteurized, or raw, dairy products. People desire them both for their health benefits as well as their flavour.

But while in Europe, raw milk cheese is so common that you can find it in vending machines, the U.S. federal regulators have kept a tight grip on our freedom to choose our dairy over safety risk concerns.

The argument may be popularized by opposing views, but the underlying issue is more fundamental than that. Should the FDA really have a say on the food you eat?

In opposition to the raw milk movement, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released a report arguing that dairy consumption causes an average of 760 illnesses and 22 hospitalizations each year, and of those, 96% were apparently caused by contaminated unpasteurized milk.


Important to note is that the report is just an estimate, its numbers derived from a model stemming from publicly available outbreak data. This doesn’t make it cut-and-dry science.

It’s largely been realized that the government’s handle on food and drug is meant to provide profit, and keep the powerful intact, while people’s health and well-being are left by the wayside. This agenda makes it difficult for Americans to access alternative medicine, as well as natural food.

Some of the statements made in the CDC’s recent report only support such beliefs, like this one, which relies on a mere assumption to justify tightening up raw milk regulations: “An easing of regulations has allowed greater access to unpasteurized milk in recent years, and this study shows that illnesses and hospitalizations will rise as consumption of unpasteurized dairy products increases.”

Further holes in the report include that it specifically looked at raw dairy contaminated with escherichia coli (E. coli), salmonella, listeria and campylobacter. Campylobacter is commonly found contaminating produce and CAFO (concentrated animal feeding operation) chickens.

In April 2017, the CDC even released a report that revealed 8,547 cases of the more than 24,000 foodborne infections reported in 2016 were caused by campylobacter. The CDC found that, “Campylobacter was found on 47 percent of raw chicken samples bought in grocery stores and tested through the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS).”

Read the rest of the article here.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to a friend