Thrive II Preview

Bernie Sanders is Right—Regulation Isn’t Enough, We Need to Ban Fracking

Posted by on April 8, 2016 in Government, Policies, Politics with 10 Comments
Anti-fracking demonstration-compressed

An anti-fracking demonstration outside New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's office in 2015. (Photo: CREDO.fracking/flickr/cc)

By Deborah Burger | Common Dreams

Hillary Clinton promises to regulate hydraulic fracturing. Yet even if she were to keep this promise, it simply doesn’t go far enough.


Fracking poses an immediate threat to the health of our communities and our environment but, most critically, it threatens our very existence by exacerbating the climate crisis. There is only one solution, that proposed by Bernie Sanders – leave it in the ground. Sanders’ unequivocal ban on fracking, coupled with a just transition to clean and renewable energy, is what this country needs.

As Secretary of State, Clinton endorsed the increased extraction, use, and export of gas and personally advocated for these policies in her discussions with world leaders.

During her tenure there, the State Department worked with large U.S. oil and gas companies to launch the Global Shale Gas Initiative which encouraged countries to reduce regulations and implement legislation that was favorable to fracking. Given her connections with the fossil fuel industry and its millions in contributions, we can expect her to promote such policies in the U.S. And this means increased injury, illness, disease, and death.

“Sanders’ unequivocal ban on fracking, coupled with a just transition to clean and renewable energy, is what this country needs.”

The health problems caused by fracking begin with those working in the fracking industry and radiate out from there.

Sean Sweeney of Trade Unions for Energy Democracy, in new research, notes that under a 2013 California disclosure law, drilling companies reported using 197 unique chemicals in 691 oil wells over a two-year period through last February. Fracking fluids, Sweeney said, typically contained about 25 chemicals. An analysis by the Environmental Working Group found that 15 of those listed are cited by California’s environmental initiative Proposition 65 as “known causes of cancer or reproductive harm.”

Fracking requires drilling deep into the earth and injecting a high-pressure water mixture (including water, sand, and chemicals) to release the gas inside the rocks. The fracking process poses greater risks to the workers involved than the already dangerous conventional natural gas extraction.

In addition to exposure to toxic chemicals, workers are exposed to silica dust from the sand. This is known to cause a lung disease called silicosis as well as lung cancer and has been linked to other lung diseases, kidney disease and autoimmune disease.

The new OSHA standard on silica released this year, although a huge improvement, illustrates well the difficulty in regulating the oil and gas industry. Not only did it take nearly 20 years to complete, the oil and gas industry has until the year 2021 before it is required to comply fully.

Fracking also affects surrounding communities and those downstream and downwind. It contaminates our water through spills, leaching, and inadequate treatment of wastewater. It pollutes our environment by releasing methane into the air during the production and transportation processes. It even causes earthquakes.

The list of adverse health effects from the hundreds of chemicals used in the fracking process is long. It includes cancers such as leukemia; immune system impairment; changes in body weight and blood chemistry; damage to the heart, nervous system, liver and kidneys; reproductive disorders; and developmental problems.

But the greatest danger from fracking is the exacerbation of the climate crisis caused by burning the gas extracted. The health effects of the climate crisis are devastating.

The direct effects include the increasing severity of hurricanes, floods, wildfires, heat waves, and droughts and the illnesses and injuries they cause.

There are also numerous diseases related to air quality such as asthma and lung cancer, heart disease, and strokes. Higher air temperatures also increase water and food-borne illnesses such as salmonella, as warmer temperatures serve as breeding grounds for these types of bacteria. Insect-borne diseases are also increasing as climate change worsens.

We see this currently with the spread of Zika. The warmer temperatures provide ideal conditions for insects such as mosquitos to breed across a much a broader area. This allows viruses to spread to areas they’ve never been before and infect populations that have not developed any immune system defenses.

Given what is at risk, it is indefensible that Clinton merely wants to regulate fracking. She maintains that she will implement safeguards such as controlling methane emissions, protecting local water supplies, and requiring disclosure of the chemicals used. Implementation and enforcement of regulations have proven difficult and ineffective at the state and federal levels. Simply put, regulations will not make fracking safe.

But more importantly, the key issue is that Clinton’s promise to regulate fracking, even if kept, misses the point. It is not just about the immediate threat that fracking poses to the health of our communities and our environment, but the threat posed to our very existence by the climate crisis.

As a nurse, I see the debilitating effects of illness and injury every day. I see patients struggling asthma, heart disease, and cancer. I know the role climate change plays in these illnesses.

And I know that the way to protect workers, communities, and the environment is to ban fracking – exactly as only one candidate states unequivocably, Bernie Sanders. This isn’t just a political issue. This is a life or death issue.

Deborah Burger is a registered nurse and a co-president of National Nurses United

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

10 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 1556156574685020@facebook.com' David Klippel says:

    Aloha, Roger that!

  2. 10207673279205806@facebook.com' Taylor Trimbath says:

    wait ban it everywhere. I am the first guy to say fracking is bad but Um that sounds like tyranny

  3. 1063185163704777@facebook.com' Courtney Gallagher says:

    #feelthebern

  4. 1239997342683625@facebook.com' Mike Bambulance says:

    Taylor is right. This is not a solution

  5. 270715709928019@facebook.com' Ok Chia Tay says:

    Conscious Life News…I think it is 346, and you? Find out here…
    pPUIDrJ ? start now. ~~> https://goo.gl/GIuIPs

    I like this post: Sanders’ unequivocal ban on fracking, coupled with a just transition to clean and renewable energy, is what this country needs.

    Do you agree with …

  6. 222739461420531@facebook.com' Calvin Calvin says:

    can we just create a safe space?

  7. 633138233456417@facebook.com' Bryan Weaver says:

    Yes, but I don’t agree with a 90% tax on my earnings.

  8. 10204515305282804@facebook.com' Suzanne Brown says:

    World wide!!

  9. 584798548336841@facebook.com' Gloria Zona says:

    YES!

  10. 10206307302897153@facebook.com' Mike Michaelis says:

    U people live in a bubble with unicorns n stuff

New Title

NOTE: Email is optional. Do NOT enter it if you do NOT want it displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend