22 States File Suit to ‘Stop the FFC’s Illegal Rollback of Net Neutrality’

Posted by on January 18, 2018 in Government, Policies with 0 Comments

The Federal Communication Commission’s December decision to roll back net neutrality rules provoked widespread protests. (Photo: Tim Carter/Flickr/cc)

By Jessica Corbett | Common Dreams

A coalition of 22 state attorneys general came together on Tuesday to keep their promise to file a lawsuit challenging the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) recent move to roll back net neutrality consumer protections.

“The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers—allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online.”
—Eric Schneiderman, New York Attorney General


Last month, the FCC—led by industry insider Ajit Paivoted along party lines to repeal rules that banned internet service providers from charging more for or blocking access to particular content.

Leading this latest effort “to stop the FCC’s illegal rollback of net neutrality” is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who said in a statement, “An open internet—and the free exchange of ideas it allows—is critical to our democratic process.”

“The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers—allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online,” Schneiderman added. “This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet.”

The other attorneys general who joined Schneiderman in filing the suit represent California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.

Their petition (pdf) claims the FCC order rolling back net neutrality protections “is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion” under the Administrative Procedure Act; violates the U.S. Constitution and the Communications Act of 1934; and “conflicts with the notice-and-rulemaking requirements” established by federal law.

The lawsuit comes as federal lawmakers, led by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), are working to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to pass a “resolution of disapproval” that would overrule the FCC order. In response to intense public pressure, Democrats have slowly signed on to the legislation, which is now reportedly only one Republican vote shy of the simple majority support that’s required to pass the proposal.

The legislation would also need to be voted on by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) on Tuesday shared the names of 81 members of the House who have pledged their support for the proposal so far, and vowed to continue seeking co-sponsors.

“There’s overwhelming public support for preserving net neutrality, so it’s no surprise that there’s strong support in Congress as well,” Doyle said. “I’m confident that if there’s enough public pressure, Congress will overturn the FCC’s order killing net neutrality.”

Public opposition to the FCC decision is widespread and defies party lines. A poll publishedlast month, just as the FCC was repealing the consumer protections, revealed more than 80 percent of Americans—75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents—opposed Pai’s plan to roll back net neutrality rules.

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

Tags: , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend